| Healthcare Bill Part III; Obamacare | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 3 2014, 02:20 PM (48,559 Views) | |
| kbp | Sep 8 2015, 06:35 AM Post #2191 |
|
When he's not pointing at Europe as the example to follow, it's Massachusetts ...you know, the state that is trying to control healthcare costs ...by setting cost increase goals about twice as high as economic growth ...failing by wide margins ...creating a $600+ million budget hole Maybe Barry should use Greece as his example to justify increasing costs for taxpayers and employers!
Edited by kbp, Sep 8 2015, 06:38 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Sep 9 2015, 05:03 PM Post #2192 |
|
Boehner Says Obamacare Ruling Shows Administration's Overreach The House can pursue some constitutional claims in a lawsuit against the Obama administration over appropriations and implementing the health care overhaul law, a federal district judge ruled Wednesday. The ruling means Congress has cleared a high procedural hurdle in the separation of powers case, one that usually stops the judiciary from stepping into fights between lawmakers and the executive branch. The House has legal standing to pursue allegations that the secretaries of Health and Human Services and Treasury are spending $175 billion over the next 10 fiscal years that was not appropriated by Congress, Judge Rosemary M. Collyer of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., wrote in the 43-page ruling. The House lawsuit asks the court to declare the president acted unconstitutionally in making payments to insurance companies under Section 1402 of the health care overhaul law (PL 111-148, PL 111-152) and to stop the payments. House Speaker John A. Boehner said the court's ruling showed that the administration's "historic overreach can be challenged by the coequal branch of government with the sole power to create or change the law. The House will continue our effort to ensure the separation of powers in our democratic system remains clear, as the Framers intended.” Wednesday’s ruling does not address the merits of the claims. Collyer acknowledged that the court was taking a rare step, but doing so carefully into a high-profile dispute, so that it wouldn’t give the House standing to file other similar lawsuits. “Despite its potential political ramifications, this suit remains a plain dispute over a constitutional command, of which the judiciary has long been the ultimate interpreter,” Collyer wrote. “The court is also assured that this decision will open no floodgates, as it is inherently limited by the extraordinary facts of which it was born.” The dispute focuses on two sections of the health care overhaul law. The administration felt it could make Section 1402 Offset Program payments from the same account as Section 1401 Refundable Tax Credit Program payments. House Republicans say the health care law doesn't permit that. The Obama administration, during the fiscal 2014 appropriations process, initially asked Congress for a separate line item for 1402 payments. Congress did not include money for such a line item. During oral arguments in the case in May, Collyer questioned government lawyers about why the administration could ignore Congress and then argue that the House couldn’t sue them. The administration argued that the House has other options, such as political remedies or passing other legislation, they said. Jonathan Turley, the attorney for the House, said in a statement that the ruling means that the House "now will be heard on an issue that drives to the very heart of our constitutional system: the control of the legislative branch over the 'power of the purse.' We are eager to present the House’s merits arguments to the Court and remain confident that our position will ultimately prevail in establishing the unconstitutional conduct alleged in this lawsuit.",,sbipped http://www.rollcall.com/news/boehner_says_obamacare_ruling_shows_administrations_overreach-243550-1.html |
![]() |
|
| LTC8K6 | Sep 11 2015, 06:23 AM Post #2193 |
|
Assistant to The Devil Himself
|
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/091015-770506-obamacare-enrollment-dropped-below-10-million-in-new-report.htm ObamaCare Enrollment Tumbles As Huge Price Hikes Loom
|
![]() |
|
| kbp | Sep 11 2015, 07:08 AM Post #2194 |
|
It is nearing a 20% dropout rate and most likely will hit that before the year is over. Investors dot com tries to attribute this dropout to premium rate hikes. We have 85% of those enrolled thru an Obamacare exchange which get subsidies, an over whelming majority of such get the maximum subsidy. Investors dot com misses the huger point of the out-of-pocket expense driving enrollee's into the dropout category. What's the point in having insurance if you can't pay the deductible ...so they'll be less bankrupt? As more of the 9.9 million still enrolled try to use their coverage, more of them will drop out. It's a program setup to fail. The ones that should be upset about the premium increases are the ones that pay the taxes to cover the subsidies! . Edited by kbp, Sep 11 2015, 07:10 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| kbp | Sep 18 2015, 07:06 AM Post #2195 |
|
Hide the money! Who has it and who approved it? |
![]() |
|
| LTC8K6 | Sep 18 2015, 08:35 PM Post #2196 |
|
Assistant to The Devil Himself
|
https://krisheldmd.wordpress.com/2015/09/14/letter-my-remaining-private-insurance-patients-will-receive-a-i-am-forced-to-terminate-all-3rd-party-agreements-as-of-october-1-the-day-hhs-mandates-icd-10-implementation/
|
![]() |
|
| kbp | Sep 18 2015, 09:46 PM Post #2197 |
|
|
![]() |
|
| kbp | Sep 23 2015, 07:27 AM Post #2198 |
|
They keep changing the method of counting heads. Whatever method they used, the 8.8M is still just over half of the 16M they projected in the budget numbers. The good news is less taxpayer funds spent, bad news is risk pools push the premiums higher (which we've seen). . |
![]() |
|
| LTC8K6 | Sep 23 2015, 09:00 AM Post #2199 |
|
Assistant to The Devil Himself
|
Clinton proposes $250 monthly cap on prescription drug costs http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/22/us-usa-election-clinton-idUSKCN0RM08D20150922
But at the same time:
|
![]() |
|
| kbp | Sep 29 2015, 07:20 AM Post #2200 |
|
I guess they're learning they need money from somebody to keep operations running smoothly! |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Sep 29 2015, 10:45 AM Post #2201 |
|
WaPo no less! The action Friday to force Health Republic Insurance of New York out of business was a coordinated maneuver by state regulators and by federal health officials, who have been trying to nurture fledgling co-ops while dealing with the reality that most are hemorrhaging red ink. Their move is the latest — and, so far, the largest — blow to an aspect of the 2010 health-care law that was intended to foster a new breed of health coverage. These Consumer Oriented and Operated Plans (CO-OP) were envisioned as an alternative to the traditional insurance companies that dominate the nation’s health coverage landscape. Many of the 23 co-ops that opened for business nearly two years ago have struggled for a toehold. But New York’s quickly became popular, attracting more than 150,000 members in its first year and, by this summer, about 210,000 members, who bought coverage on their own or through small businesses. Another fine pig of a program from Obamacare that is all hot air & failed promise. Edited by Baldo, Sep 29 2015, 10:46 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Sep 29 2015, 01:48 PM Post #2202 |
|
The Stunning "Explanation" An Insurance Company Just Used To Boost Health Premiums By 60%![]() http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-29/stunning-explanation-insurance-company-just-used-boost-health-premiums-60 see article |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Sep 30 2015, 02:38 PM Post #2203 |
|
Congressman: Expand Obamacare to Undocumented Immigrants Rep Luis V. Gutiérrez, one of Congress’ most outspoken advocates for immigrants, on Wednesday called for expanding the Affordable Care Act to cover all of the estimated 11 million undocumented migrants in the United States. “The goal is to make integration and inclusion real for millions of families that are locked out under current law,” the Illinois Democrat said in a floor speech introducing his proposed legislation. “As it stands right now, undocumented immigrants are not subject to the individual mandate and cannot buy into health insurance exchanges even if they use their own money. My legislation will change that. It says that we stand for inclusion.” Citing last week’s papal address to Congress (the pope repeatedly urged U.S. lawmakers to follow “the Golden Rule”) Gutiérrez said: “Doing unto others as you would have them do unto you means moving forward with no restrictions on which brother and sister and neighbor we think of as ‘eligible’ or ‘deserving.’” The Gutiérrez proposal faces long odds in the House, where proposals to overhaul immigration have been stymied by Republicans who say the federal government has to address holes in border security first....snipped http://www3.blogs.rollcall.com/218/congressman-expand-obamacare-to-undocumented/ |
![]() |
|
| kbp | Sep 30 2015, 09:53 PM Post #2204 |
|
I'm still trying to figure out how we'll pay for what we have so far! |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Sep 30 2015, 11:53 PM Post #2205 |
|
tut tut! pay for it??? We will just print up some more money! BTW I wonder what plan the congressman wants to give this illegals? Will it be the silver plan or just the basic $5000 deductible? I am sure they are going to pay. What a disaster in the making |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · LIESTOPPERS UNDERGROUND · Next Topic » |








11:54 AM Jul 13