| ‘Agenda 21’; A MUST READ FOR ANYONE VOTING. | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Sep 13 2012, 01:16 PM (420 Views) | |
| Kerri P. | Sep 13 2012, 01:16 PM Post #1 |
|
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/is-the-soros-sponsored-agenda-21-a-hidden-plan-for-world-government-yes-only-it-is-not-hidden/ Is the Soros-Sponsored ‘Agenda 21’ a Hidden Plan for World Government? (Yes, Only it Is Not Hidden) What is Agenda 21? If you do not know about it, you should. Agenda 21 is a two-decade old, grand plan for global ’Sustainable Development,’ brought to you from the United Nations. George H.W. Bush (and 177 other world leaders) agreed to it back in 1992, and in 1995, Bill Clinton signed Executive Order #12858, creating a Presidential Council on ‘Sustainable Development.’ This effectively pushed the UN plan into America’s large, churning government machine without the need for any review or discussion by Congress or the American people. ‘Sustainable Development’ sounds like a nice idea, right? It sounds nice, until you scratch the surface and find that Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development are really cloaked plans to impose the tenets of Social Justice/Socialism on the world. At risk from Agenda 21; •Private Property ownership •Single-Family homes •Private car ownership and individual travel choices •Privately owned farms The Agenda 21 plan openly targets private property. For over thirty-five years the UN has made their stance very clear on the issue of individuals owning land; Land… cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. The provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interest of society as a whole. |
![]() |
|
| Kerri P. | Sep 13 2012, 04:28 PM Post #2 |
|
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?gl=US&hl=en-US&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.knowthelies.com%2Fnode%2F7632&client=ms-hms-tmobile-wow-us&q=Barack+Obamas+opinion+on+Agenda+21&sa=X&ei=8TJSUIncIafa0QG2iIGwCw&ved=0CCUQFjAD |
![]() |
|
| kbp | Sep 13 2012, 04:55 PM Post #3 |
|
It's not quite as easy as some may really believe. Barry can push fast track rail and/or walking trails to add some influence on where future development may go, just as local or even state governments can enact laws and ordinances that resemble "Agenda 21" plans, but the US Constitution trumps all here (of course SCOTUS Justices are important!). When a governing body takes property, they generally have to compensate the owner, so finances limit what can be accomplished. |
![]() |
|
| chatham | Sep 13 2012, 06:57 PM Post #4 |
|
Money is not a question anymore because of Kelo vs city of New London. Government land grab for private business. |
![]() |
|
| foxglove | Sep 13 2012, 07:11 PM Post #5 |
|
I already see a push for increased bike riding and more sidewalks in my locality. I have nothing against people riding bikes or walking except as a prelude to a long term goal of doing away with cars. In my community, federal money will build sidewalks and a high visibility biking and walking club has sprung up. Things like Agenda 21 always start as a good idea. It's where these ideas end up that is the problem. There was discussion at the local level years ago about regionalizing and having planned communities of small dwellings. Agenda 21 is not just a plan at the federal level but at the state and local level as well. Agenda 21-- talk about a radical transformation of a country! |
![]() |
|
| kbp | Sep 13 2012, 07:35 PM Post #6 |
|
The problem with Kelo vs city of New London was not whether or not the compensation was fair, it was the fact eminent domain was used soley for the benefit of a private developer. The court decided that it was also a benefit to the public. The people that did not want to sell were hosed, but they were NOT due higher compensation just because the development would later make the property worth more. Also, states both before and after had passed laws to prevent this. As far as it relates to Agenda 21, somebody has to pay compensation for taking property. |
![]() |
|
| retiredLEO | Sep 13 2012, 07:43 PM Post #7 |
|
Read all about AGENDA "21" here, it is a UN proposal. http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_00.shtml Once we sign a treaty it will trump the courts. |
![]() |
|
| kbp | Sep 13 2012, 08:19 PM Post #8 |
|
That's a broad statement. Since a treaty can't violate the Constitution, parts of Agenda 21 may not survive even if a treaty for such is signed by the POTUS and the Senate approves it. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · LIESTOPPERS UNDERGROUND · Next Topic » |






9:49 AM Jul 11