Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Diversity ...in Britain; coming to a place near you soon
Topic Started: Jun 2 2012, 10:07 AM (263 Views)
kbp


Due its own thread...

posted by Quasimodo
 
http://www.dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/2133/Liberty-Lost.aspx

(snip)

Back in 2001, Britain’s political parties signed a fantastic pledge. They agreed to say nothing to “stir up racial or religious hatred, or lead to prejudice on grounds of race, nationality or religion.”

This gag order did more than keep the parties polite. Vital issues – from massive immigration and multiculturalism to their eradicating effects on British civilization – were officially banned. Thus, such concerns became impermissible thoughts. Not that such issues weren’t already thoughtcrime, as George Orwell would have put it. But this unprecedented pledge turned “violators” into political lepers.

I thought of that elite code of cowardice this week when a London judge sentenced a 42-year-old British secretary named Jacqueline Woodhouse to 21 weeks in jail. Her crime? An [drunken] expletive-laden rant about immigration, multiculturalism and the disappearance of British civilization. Not in so many words. But that was the unmistakable gist of Woodhouse’s commentary one January night on the London Underground.

This same week, another London judge ordered two black girls, 18 and 19, to perform community service after a savage physical attack on two white legal secretaries. “I am satisfied what you both did, you did that night because you were fueled by alcohol,” Judge Stephen Kramer said, as though tut-tutting a child’s unknowing apple theft.

A few months ago, another London judge freed four Somali Muslim women who set upon a white couple, yelling, “Kill the white slag,” and other anti-white slurs. The gang beat the woman to the ground and ripped out a patch of her hair. Judge Robert Brown was lenient because, he ruled, as Muslims, the women were not used to being drunk.

Jacqueline Woodhouse was drunk, too, but that was no mitigating factor in her case. She harmed no one, but that was no mitigating factor, either. Judge Michael Snow invoked the “deep sense of shame” Woodhouse’s display elicited, because “our citizens … may, as a consequence, believe that it secretly represents the views of other white people.”

“Thoughtcrime is death,” as Orwell wrote in “1984.”

And, thanks to YouTube, it becomes continuous spectacle. Woodhouse’s court-deemed “victim,” Galbant Singh Juttla, recorded and uploaded her display. After the six-minute clip went viral, Woodhouse turned herself in to police.

But what might she have confessed to?

I did it, mates. I said: “I used to live in England. Now I live in the United Nations.”

That’ll be 21 weeks in the clink?

Woodhouse said a lot of other things as she surveyed her fellow passengers, her squawky voice weirdly reminiscent of an Eliza Doolittle grown old without having met her Henry Higgins. “All bleeping foreign bleeping bleeps,” she says. “Where do you come from? Where do you come from? Where do you come from?” She estimated that 30 percent of the train’s passengers were in the country illegally.

Off with her head.

Expletives fly regarding England (“this bleeping country is a bleeping joke”), Pakistanis, illegals, pigs.

“I wouldn’t mind if you loved our country,” she said, lucid, to a Pakistani beside her.

“Long live Pakistan,” he said twice in Urdu, later leading a chorus of the Pakistani national anthem.

Woodhouse then notices her “victim” recording her. “Oh, look, he’s filming,” she says. “Hello, government.” She leans into the camera.

“Why don’t you tell us your name, as well?” Juttla the “victim” says.

“Why don’t you tell me where you’re from?” she says.

“I’m British, I’m British, yeah? I’m British,” he tells her.

“Right. OK,” she says.

“So, what’s your problem?” he says.

“Oh, what’s your problem?” she says.

“Yeah, you should watch what you say.”

“Watch what I say?”

“Yeah.”

“I used to live in England. Now I live in the United Nations.”

“So keep your mouth shut then.”

“Why should I?”

Twenty-one weeks in jail, folks.

Why, Woodhouse quite rationally asks, “am I not allowed to express my opinions?”

“We don’t want to hear your opinions,” Juttla replies.

This tears it. “Why is it all right for you but not all right for me?” She’s shrieking now, her voice cutting the air like a ragged-edged razor.

There is background laughter, but nothing is funny. For a few, farcical minutes, a nation’s tragedy -- its unmourned, unmarked passing -- has taken the spotlight, the lead role played by a drunken secretary because there is no one else.

“Just keep your mouth shut,” Juttla says for the umpteenth time.

“Why should you open your gob and I can’t open mine?”

“Because you questioned me first,” he says, which isn’t true. Juttla questioned Woodhouse first, asking for her name. Surely, Big Brother would want to know.

“I’m sorry,” she says. “Not one rule for you and one rule for me.”

Oh, yes, Jacqueline. One rule for indigenous islanders.

One rule for everyone else.



Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

The viral video that convicted her


Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Quote:
 
Racist Tube rant woman Jacqueline Woodhouse jailed

...Condemning Woodhouse's outburst, District Judge Michael Snow said: "Anyone viewing it would feel a deep sense of shame that our citizens could be subject to such behaviour who may, as a consequence, believe that it secretly represents the views of other white people.

'Grossly offensive'

"The train was packed with people from a variety of ethnic backgrounds," he added. "The people included children."

"She became loud, foul-mouthed and aggressive. She targeted her behaviour at those who weren't white.

"She threatened violence against more than one person and it took place over a prolonged period."

He added her "grossly offensive" language reflected her hostility to her fellow passengers.

The judge told Woodhouse she would serve half her prison term behind bars and imposed an order banning her from using the Tube and the Docklands Light Railway while drunk, for a five-year period.


Not sure what he meant by "threatened violence", but his statement "The train was packed with people from a variety of ethnic backgrounds" seems to hit directly on the facts she was complaining about!


Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

"I used to live in England and now I live in the United Nations."

She forgot to mention what currency she must now live by!!!!
Edited by kbp, Jun 2 2012, 10:20 AM.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Judges says...
"She targeted her behaviour at those who weren’t white."

I'm still searching to find out what the exact crime is, but I suspect I'm getting closer!!!

Been through a dozen articles, no mention of immigration problems in that country ...the United Nations I think she called it.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

The articles mentioned that she lost her job and is now living on benefits, so I presume the system there is functioning just like it was set up to.

Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Posted Image

The British citizen ...ugh, victim.

Is that a bloody bandage over his ears?
Edited by kbp, Jun 2 2012, 10:33 AM.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Quote:
 
Jacqueline Woodhouse, woman in racist Tube rant jailed

....The video of her racist rant in which she lamented, "I used to live in England, now I live in the United Nations," went viral online, receiving over 200,000 views on YouTube. Digital Journal reports that Jacqueline subjected fellow Tube passengers to extreme racist abuse, speaking in a thick Essex accent (see video above): "All f****** foreign f****** shitheads... Where do you come from? F***** all over the world, f****** jokers. F****** country's a f****** joke. I would like to know if any of you are illegal? I am sure like 30% of you are. F****** jokers taking the f****** piss."

....Tuesday, District Judge Michael Snow, said "Anyone viewing would feel a deep sense of shame that our citizens could be subject to such behaviour who may, as a consequence, believe that it secretly represents the views of other white people."


Still no mention of what the crime is, not that I can understand unless it is just a crime to rant in a manner some disapprove of.



Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

The basic issue is: Does England believe in free speech or not? If not say so. It seems pretty evident from this case that the influx which the Brits have allowed from the middle east has shut down any form of free speech and the immigrants know it. Indeed, wake up America. How far behind will we be if we have a President like Obama who gets a shot at appointing two more justices to the Supreme Court.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
longstop
longstop
linked from pjmedia

Britain’s Already Dead, It Just Hasn’t Been Buried Yet.

Don’t be fooled by the pomp of the Queen’s royal Diamond Jubilee flotilla this weekend. Britain is a country rotting from the inside.

snip

http://pjmedia.com/blog/britains-already-dead/
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
« Previous Topic · LIESTOPPERS UNDERGROUND · Next Topic »
Add Reply