Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Paying for Others to Have Sex
Topic Started: Mar 4 2012, 06:06 PM (2,488 Views)
Mason
Member Avatar
Parts unknown
.
I finally found someone (a small blog) commenting on the DEMS and the WH constantly sending campaign stuff and requests for money - with Michelle Obama in different poses and different Ads. Then the kids - the kids in the forefront - over and over.

I believe Obama's people Identified that the women vote is the swing vote. Fool the women and walk away with the Presidency for four more years. Now they are pressing women's buttons and herding them up for the drive.

That is the idea anyway.


.
Edited by Mason, Mar 6 2012, 06:33 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Mason
Mar 6 2012, 06:33 PM
.
I finally found someone (a small blog) commenting on the DEMS and the WH constantly sending campaign stuff and requests for money - with Michelle Obama in different poses and different Ads. Then the kids - the kids in the forefront - over and over.

I believe Obama's people Identified that the women vote is the swing vote. Fool the women and walk away with the Presidency for four more years. Now they are pressing women's buttons and herding them up for the drive.

That is the idea anyway.


.
If women are the swing votes this year and contraception the pivotal issue, then we are in worse trouble than I once thought.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Truth Detector
Mar 6 2012, 08:20 PM
Mason
Mar 6 2012, 06:33 PM
.
I finally found someone (a small blog) commenting on the DEMS and the WH constantly sending campaign stuff and requests for money - with Michelle Obama in different poses and different Ads. Then the kids - the kids in the forefront - over and over.

I believe Obama's people Identified that the women vote is the swing vote. Fool the women and walk away with the Presidency for four more years. Now they are pressing women's buttons and herding them up for the drive.

That is the idea anyway.


.
If women are the swing votes this year and contraception the pivotal issue, then we are in worse trouble than I once thought.
That's FREE contraception

...and a couple other things the press will not mention.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kerri P.
Member Avatar

http://news.yahoo.com/women-took-pill-had-8-percent-higher-income-195424592.html
Women Who Took the Pill Had an 8 Percent Higher Income by Age 50

:bump: :bump:
Edited by Kerri P., Mar 6 2012, 08:39 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mason
Member Avatar
Parts unknown
.
Where did, 'Jane, you ignorant slut' originate?

It wasn't from the conservative movement.

This whole thing was cooked up by the DEM operatives in the WH. George Stephanopulous purposefully launched it for them.

They are getting 94% of the black vote, not much to pick from there. The women are going to swing this election.


.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mason
Member Avatar
Parts unknown
Kerri P.
Mar 6 2012, 08:39 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/women-took-pill-had-8-percent-higher-income-195424592.html
Women Who Took the Pill Had an 8 Percent Higher Income by Age 50

:bump: :bump:
.
CNN and Google led with the Millionaire or Billionaire that left a one dollar tip and a heartless note to the waitress.

The photocopied receipt was magnified 6x and published.

It was a fake, a Hoax, more BS.



.
Edited by Mason, Mar 6 2012, 08:49 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
foxglove

Mason
Mar 6 2012, 06:33 PM
.
I finally found someone (a small blog) commenting on the DEMS and the WH constantly sending campaign stuff and requests for money - with Michelle Obama in different poses and different Ads. Then the kids - the kids in the forefront - over and over.

I believe Obama's people Identified that the women vote is the swing vote. Fool the women and walk away with the Presidency for four more years. Now they are pressing women's buttons and herding them up for the drive.

That is the idea anyway.


.
Women still have to buy gasoline for their cars and buy food for themselves or families.

Obama's reckless spending and gambling on green energy firms (wasting money or corruption) are costing everyone at the gas pumps and grocery lines. Ask women if they want a husband who spends recklessly and gambles. Do they want a President who does the same? Republicans need to go back to those issues. Also harp on Obama's comfort with infanticide. Some people may not like the Catholic Church's stance on birth control and people can disagree on that, but almost everyone is going to have a problem with infanticide.

Another thing would be for Republicans to cool it with the war rhetoric. I don't think that is a winning issue.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Foxlair45
Member Avatar

This woman (Fluke) is just plain stupid. I just checked my medical insurance regarding contraceptives. My insurance is fairly typical in terms of what is covered; I am in my second career and this coverage is exactly the same as my former employer offered. This is a copy/paste right out of the book on what is covered:

- Depo-Provera
− Diaphragms and contraceptive rings
− Intrauterine devices (IUDs)
− Implantable contraceptives
− Oral and transdermal contraceptives

BUT -- they are subject to the same co-pay, limits and deductibles as any other prescription medication. Heavens! It's a bunch cheaper NOT to have them covered and get the $9 variety at WalMart. It's sad that some one has reached aged 30 with no research skills at all. How is she getting through law school?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Kerri P.
Mar 6 2012, 08:39 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/women-took-pill-had-8-percent-higher-income-195424592.html
Women Who Took the Pill Had an 8 Percent Higher Income by Age 50

:bump: :bump:
One would expect women with fewer or no children to advance further in their careers. That's a choice they selected.



**************

...This whole thing was cooked up by the DEM operatives in the WH. George Stephanopulous purposefully launched it for them


Fools follow others.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Foxlair45
Mar 6 2012, 08:56 PM
This woman (Fluke) is just plain stupid. I just checked my medical insurance regarding contraceptives. My insurance is fairly typical in terms of what is covered; I am in my second career and this coverage is exactly the same as my former employer offered. This is a copy/paste right out of the book on what is covered:

- Depo-Provera
− Diaphragms and contraceptive rings
− Intrauterine devices (IUDs)
− Implantable contraceptives
− Oral and transdermal contraceptives

BUT -- they are subject to the same co-pay, limits and deductibles as any other prescription medication. Heavens! It's a bunch cheaper NOT to have them covered and get the $9 variety at WalMart. It's sad that some one has reached aged 30 with no research skills at all. How is she getting through law school?
As I read her speech, she did not need research to preach about heart breaking tales that had nothing to do with preventive meds.

The highlight of that speech was a young woman losing her uterus because she did not get the pill necessary for TREATMENT of a diagnosed medical condition …which had NOTHING to do with PREVENTING pregnancy.
Edited by kbp, Mar 6 2012, 09:10 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Foxlair45
Member Avatar

kbp
Mar 6 2012, 09:09 PM
Foxlair45
Mar 6 2012, 08:56 PM
This woman (Fluke) is just plain stupid. I just checked my medical insurance regarding contraceptives. My insurance is fairly typical in terms of what is covered; I am in my second career and this coverage is exactly the same as my former employer offered. This is a copy/paste right out of the book on what is covered:

- Depo-Provera
− Diaphragms and contraceptive rings
− Intrauterine devices (IUDs)
− Implantable contraceptives
− Oral and transdermal contraceptives

BUT -- they are subject to the same co-pay, limits and deductibles as any other prescription medication. Heavens! It's a bunch cheaper NOT to have them covered and get the $9 variety at WalMart. It's sad that some one has reached aged 30 with no research skills at all. How is she getting through law school?
As I read her speech, she did not need research to preach about heart breaking tales that had nothing to do with preventive meds.

The highlight of that speech was a young woman losing her uterus because she did not get the pill necessary for TREATMENT of a diagnosed medical condition …which had NOTHING to do with PREVENTING pregnancy.
I would bet you that Georgetown's policies cover such prescriptions for that kind of medical condition. Her argument is false; and I imagine they are covered with the same co-pays and deductibles as other meds.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mason
Member Avatar
Parts unknown
foxglove
Mar 6 2012, 08:54 PM
Mason
Mar 6 2012, 06:33 PM
.
I finally found someone (a small blog) commenting on the DEMS and the WH constantly sending campaign stuff and requests for money - with Michelle Obama in different poses and different Ads. Then the kids - the kids in the forefront - over and over.

I believe Obama's people Identified that the women vote is the swing vote. Fool the women and walk away with the Presidency for four more years. Now they are pressing women's buttons and herding them up for the drive.

That is the idea anyway.


.
Women still have to buy gasoline for their cars and buy food for themselves or families.

Obama's reckless spending and gambling on green energy firms (wasting money or corruption) are costing everyone at the gas pumps and grocery lines.
.
Good points, however, I think the calculation may be the birth control stuff is an emotional issue with women, while the others are not.

How many elections did they manipulate the elderly by scaring them?

I can remember the years where it was simple to understand the proposed cuts were to increases scheduled. The check would go up - but not at the rate of the first proposal. Dems said they wanted old people to eat dog food - and they were rewarded at the Polls.

You logic looks sound to me - but I also can't figure out how people fall for Obama rushing out to cameras and acting indignant when Michelle is mentioned in a Politcal context, then he sends her to make a speech to some bloc and plasters her face on fund-raising material. You see that with his kids now.


.


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Foxlair45
Mar 6 2012, 09:14 PM
kbp
Mar 6 2012, 09:09 PM
Foxlair45
Mar 6 2012, 08:56 PM
This woman (Fluke) is just plain stupid. I just checked my medical insurance regarding contraceptives. My insurance is fairly typical in terms of what is covered; I am in my second career and this coverage is exactly the same as my former employer offered. This is a copy/paste right out of the book on what is covered:

- Depo-Provera
− Diaphragms and contraceptive rings
− Intrauterine devices (IUDs)
− Implantable contraceptives
− Oral and transdermal contraceptives

BUT -- they are subject to the same co-pay, limits and deductibles as any other prescription medication. Heavens! It's a bunch cheaper NOT to have them covered and get the $9 variety at WalMart. It's sad that some one has reached aged 30 with no research skills at all. How is she getting through law school?
As I read her speech, she did not need research to preach about heart breaking tales that had nothing to do with preventive meds.

The highlight of that speech was a young woman losing her uterus because she did not get the pill necessary for TREATMENT of a diagnosed medical condition …which had NOTHING to do with PREVENTING pregnancy.
I would bet you that Georgetown's policies cover such prescriptions for that kind of medical condition. Her argument is false; and I imagine they are covered with the same co-pays and deductibles as other meds.
My error! I think it was an ovary that was claimed to have been lost.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mason
Member Avatar
Parts unknown
.
There's another thing here. You had Nancy Pelosi and others in Gov't - and their mouthpieces saying the Catholic Church is distant from the views of their parishioners - on paying for birth control and other reproductive issues.

We don't want a Government that polices Churches now, do we? We don't want any part of that. If they don't agree with the Catholic church, get up and go - but the Government better stay the heck out of that.

We see encroachment in areas that people never dreamed would happen in the USA. In fact, if you would've said in 2008 during Owebama's Campaign that this was going to happen, people would've laughed in your face. You would've been called crazy.

This fluke, Pelosi, Obama, Stephanopolus was all orchestrated and coordinated - right down to the President inserting his daughters into the debate.


.

Edited by Mason, Mar 6 2012, 09:33 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Mason
Mar 6 2012, 09:31 PM
.
There's another thing here. You had Nancy Pelosi and others in Gov't - and their mouthpieces saying the Catholic Church is distant from the views of their parishioners - on paying for birth control and other reproductive issues.

We don't want a Government that polices Churches now, do we? We don't want any part of that. If they don't agree with the Catholic church, get up and go - but the Government better stay the heck out of that.

We see encroachment in areas that people never dreamed would happen in the USA. In fact, if you would've said in 2008 during Owebama's Campaign that this was going to happen, people would've laughed in your face. You would've been called crazy.

This fluke, Pelosi, Obama, Stephanopolus was all orchestrated and coordinated - right down to the President inserting his daughters into the debate.


.

I feel Barry doesn't care if the church is upset, as he trades some Catholic votes for moderate women. That's a win-win in his mind.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community.
Learn More · Register for Free
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · LIESTOPPERS UNDERGROUND · Next Topic »
Add Reply