| Bristol Palin Needs More Money | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 2 2012, 04:18 AM (354 Views) | |
| Mason | Mar 2 2012, 04:18 AM Post #1 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. Bristol Palin has sold herself for a Reality TV show now. God Help us. . |
![]() |
|
| foxglove | Mar 2 2012, 06:42 AM Post #2 |
|
By now it's a big yawn. |
![]() |
|
| kbp | Mar 2 2012, 08:30 AM Post #3 |
|
It's disappointing that the reason she is famous is because she got pregnant when she was 17 YO and is a single-parent. I hope, for the child's sake, that she is a good parent. |
![]() |
|
| cks | Mar 2 2012, 08:39 AM Post #4 |
|
This is why Sarah Palin as a candidate (no matter what one thinks of her political views) will never go anywhere. While one cannot control what one's adult child decides to do, the child's actions and decisions can affect the parent. If a child respects and loves his/her parents, he/she would not do something that would embarass or belittle said parent. |
![]() |
|
| Mason | Mar 2 2012, 09:22 AM Post #5 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. It's hard to get off that gravy train. Especially when you haven't had a real job. . |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Mar 2 2012, 09:58 AM Post #6 |
|
Look on the positive side. She isn't on welfare getting her EBT card buying donuts & pizza living in Section 8 housing. She isn't selling nude photos, etc. She, like many girls before at 17, couldn't say no to a young, good looking, teenage boy when she sneaked out of the house. For that she got pregnant. Did she have an abortion? Nope. She had her baby and is raising her son as a single Mom. Obama would have like his daughters to have options when they made a mistake. How simple it would have been for Bristol. |
![]() |
|
| kbp | Mar 2 2012, 10:14 AM Post #7 |
|
I withhold from passing any judgment that condemns her, but I also refuse to reward her for HOW she got the fame that is evidently paying her so well now. Sarah would only have faced a political problem from Bristol in the primary, if she would at all, the left would probably praise Bristol for the wrong reasons. I like Sarah, but I'm left without a reasonable excuse for her bailing out of office in Alaska, which is something I think would kill her in the general election. |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Mar 2 2012, 12:26 PM Post #8 |
|
It would have been better if she had served out her term. However I was not in her shoes nor was being hounded day & night with lawsuits. The Left was viciously attacking her. Financially she is much better off and has provided for her family. I'm sure she is happier. For the people of Alaska it was probably better she did resign as they no longer have a distracted Governor. I am concerned about how we go after candidates, it applies to both political sides. Some deserve it, but Sarah didn't deserve the attacks over her son. It was downright mean. I believe she made the right decision to not run for President. Edited by Baldo, Mar 2 2012, 12:28 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| agatha | Mar 2 2012, 12:46 PM Post #9 |
|
Me too. When do I get my reality show? |
![]() |
|
| Mason | Mar 2 2012, 02:20 PM Post #10 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. She has already blown through well over a Million. Plastic Surgery, 4,000 Sq. Foot house, and on down the line. I said she was a troubled idiot from the beginning. . Edited by Mason, Mar 2 2012, 02:25 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| chatham | Mar 2 2012, 02:32 PM Post #11 |
|
It is not Bristol Palins fault she got caught up in her mothers political fortunes that the left so proudly abused. I am still glad that Palins son, Trig, was too small to hear all of the lefts abuse of him. I don't think I can say much about anyone choosing any opportunity that comes along their way in life. |
![]() |
|
| cks | Mar 2 2012, 04:11 PM Post #12 |
|
The fact that she allows herself to be used (abused) in such a public way indicates that she has little self-respect. It is really very sad - though I suppose, given who the father of her child is, she figures that anything that she can do to earn money to raise her child she needs to do. My guess is that the Palin household was not quite all that the favorable Palin press painted it to be. I have come to the belief that one cannot have both parents out constantly doing "their own thing" without a cost to the children of that marriage. Raising children is hard work (rewarding yes but hard nonetheless). I do not believe that it is necessarily the mother's sole job - nor should it necessarily be the father's.......but someone (or coming to some agreement on how the duties will be divied up) needs to be aware of what the children are doing and be on the scene and available for the interaction that is required to keep children out of danger (danger created because of poor choices, societal influences, etc.). |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · LIESTOPPERS UNDERGROUND · Next Topic » |







7:50 PM Jul 10