| Obama's Address about Israeli Palestine Conflict; Wants return to 1967 Israeli Border | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 18 2011, 08:35 PM (4,414 Views) | |
| kbp | May 30 2011, 11:13 PM Post #136 |
|
Obama ha$ $omething to $ay about the Arab $pring. |
![]() |
|
| Acc Esq | May 31 2011, 02:40 PM Post #137 |
|
From my email list: Dear President Obama: I am writing today with a somewhat unusual request. First and foremost, I will be asking that you return America to its August 20th, 1959 borders so that Hawaii is no longer a state and you are no longer a citizen. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | May 31 2011, 05:04 PM Post #138 |
|
I am passing that along! |
![]() |
|
| retiredLEO | May 31 2011, 05:20 PM Post #139 |
|
Netanyahu Urges U.S. Return To 1845 Borders Posted by Dan Friedman BigPeace.com May 20th 2011 Netanyahu Urges U.S. Return to 1845 Borders Israeli PM calls for “just solution” to end the conflict. Aboard Air Force Aleph (Reuters) – Speaking to reporters accompanying Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on his long flight to the United States tonight, Netanyahu spoke of the injustice and hardship Mexicans have endured since American forces annexed Texas in 1845. “Tens of thousands of ordinary Mexicans were driven out of their homes – the only homes they had known for centuries – and forced to live in poverty and squalor south of the border imposed by American aggression,” Netanyahu said. “The Israeli and Mexican people agree on this: This festering wound will never heal until America takes bold steps to return to the internationally accepted lines of 1845. Clearly the settlement activity that’s taken place in occupied Mexico since then is illegal. When I meet the President tomorrow I will tell him to halt all building activity in Texas immediately. Two lands for two peoples, yes, but not on land taken by force from Mexico,” the Prime Minister said. Asked if his hard-line stance could hurt the U.S.-Israel relationship, Netanyahu reiterated Israel’s commitment to America’s security and the unshakeable friendship shared by the two countries, then added, “But who was it who said, part of friendship is being able to tell your friend the truth. The ball is now in Obama’s court.” |
![]() |
|
| kbp | May 31 2011, 05:29 PM Post #140 |
|
Has Texas asked the UN to be recognized as a nation ...yet? |
![]() |
|
| LTC8K6 | May 31 2011, 06:52 PM Post #141 |
|
Assistant to The Devil Himself
|
He'd still be eligible. |
![]() |
|
| kbp | May 31 2011, 07:00 PM Post #142 |
|
Well ...going back to old borders now wouldn't alter his status. |
![]() |
|
| retiredLEO | May 31 2011, 07:04 PM Post #143 |
|
Why, he was born in Kenya, according to the book Corsi put out there, "Where's the Birth Certificate" Obama's mother Stanley Ann could not be located in Hawaii from Jan 31 until Sept 19, when she showed up in Seatle Washington. No one ever came forward to say they saw Stanley Ann pregnant and seeing her in Hawaii during that time period. The only people that seemed to come forward were the residents of Kenya. |
![]() |
|
| kbp | May 31 2011, 07:43 PM Post #144 |
|
At this point we do not have absolute proof that he was not born in Hawaii, any case law that shows his father's lack of citizenship prevents him from being a "natural born citizen", nor any authority demanding that he prove he is "eligible". So the point in question, if I understand LTC's post correctly, is that the change in borders would not alter what the present status is. ADD: IMO, even if SCOTUS took on a case and ruled both parents MUST be citizens - as I anticipate they would - it would not happen in time to disqualify him for the '12 election ...with exception to discovery proving he he was involved in a fraudulent act by posting that latest BC ...that is a problem which could develop and haunt him. Edited by kbp, May 31 2011, 07:48 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Jun 10 2011, 06:30 PM Post #145 |
|
Follow up to Netanyahu lecturing Obama in front of White House Press From a supposed White House Insider - I have no idea if true Received this information late yesterday. Thought you might wish to know. Shortly after the photo-op meeting and “working lunch” with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the one that saw President Obama openly chastised by the Prime Minister for Obama’s earlier public comments regarding wanting to see Israel return to its 1968 borders, the president verbally “went off” on Richard Daley in the private study area that adjoins the Oval Office. President Obama’s verbal attack was clearly heard by numerous staff up and down the West Wing hallways. The essence of the president’s rage and embarrassment can best be summed up with him yelling out very loudly, “What the f-ck was that!?” That phrase was apparently repeated a number of times in the span of about five minutes, a time period in which Obama’s voice became “louder and louder” and culminating in Obama exclaiming, “Never again! Do you understand me? Never again!” Any response by Bill Daley back to the president, if given, was not overheard. Daley was soon after seen walking slowly down the hallway back toward his own office. He appeared “unconcerned” and was walking alone. His mood was apparently good enough that he took the time to speak briefly with some junior staffers before continuing down the hall. There was no sign of the president, though Valerie Jarrett did make an appearance on her way into the Oval Office. This was viewed as somewhat of a rare thing as Jarrett has apparently not been seen much on the lower levels of the West Wing for the last month or so. Neither she nor the president was seen for some time after that. The president did not emerge until it was time to make another brief speech at a nearby location later that afternoon. I did not receive information on whether or not Daley accompanied the president on that short trip, but the president’s mood was described as “much improved” when he returned. While the details of this confrontation are a bit dated, I found them very interesting and think they provide some clear insight into the debilitating pressures that I am certain are getting to the president, and given the more recent developments that are now challenging the administration, I would not be at all surprised to hear more such examples coming from inside the White House in the very near future. Oh, and another little FYI in case you missed it. Obama had a recent “meeting” with some of his former top advisers very recently. In my line of work that means only one thing. This administration is absolutely sh-tting itself right now. The cover is being blown off, the fingers of blame are being pointed, and discussions over who is going to take the fall are happening this very moment. Things are going rather well for us. Not too bad for an old news almost out to pasture relic huh? Much work remains to be done though. Stay safe. http://socyberty.com/politics/white-house-insider-obamas-rage-over-netanyahu-meeting-what-the-f-ck-was-that/ "Never Again?" |
![]() |
|
| retiredLEO | Jun 10 2011, 07:27 PM Post #146 |
|
I agree with you summation about the SC. Corsi points out in his book there is a difference between Native Born and Natural Born. The example is that if an a US citizen marries a British citizen, they have a child in NYC, while the Brit is working in the US at a bank. He get transferred back to England, brings his wife and child, the child attend schools in England, moves back to the US at the age of 25. The young man moves back to the US and runs for the senate and wins, when he turns 35, he runs for POTUS. He is a citizen of the UK and a US native born citizen, not a Natural born citizen, as required by the Constitution. Obama has more questions to answer then just that, even if born in Hawaii. At birth he was a US NATIVE BORN citizen and a Kenyan, or British citizen back then. Then he was supposedly adopted by his stepfather, when his mother moved to Indonesia, he bacame a citizen of Indonesia, it is even on his school record of that time period during the time of his enrollment. So he is not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. Remember when the dems tried to eliminate John McCain, because he was born in the Panama Canal Zone, while his father was serving in the US Navy? Both of McCains parents were NATURAL BORN citizens. The argument Corsi makes is that Obama is not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. One other thing I found interesting about the Corsi book, it that Obama's mother worked for Peter Geithner, who was head of the Ford Foundation in Indonisia and is Timothy Geithnen's father. That is how far back Obama goes with connections. He IMHO is the manchurian candidate and now the manchurian POTUS The way they want to define Natural born citizen, if two Mexicans cross the border illegally and give birth in the US that would be Natural Born Citizen and it's not Edited by retiredLEO, Jun 10 2011, 07:32 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Jun 12 2011, 09:36 PM Post #147 |
|
Report: US gives Netanyahu ultimatum on resuming talks By JPOST.COM STAFF 06/12/2011 08:30 The United States gave Netanyahu an ultimatum on renewing negotiations with the Palestinians, according to reports cited by Israel Radio Sunday morning. According to the ultimatum, Netanyahu has to decide within a month whether he agrees to accept US President Barack Obama’s platform and resume talks based on 1967 lines....snipped http://www.jpost.com/Headlines/Article.aspx?id=224618 |
![]() |
|
| kbp | Jun 12 2011, 09:47 PM Post #148 |
|
LOL! The smart thing would be to just play along. The odds of there being peace that involves any representing Hamas is below ZERO. The bold move would be to demand an outline for the negotiations and then respond to Congress ONLY, as if Obama doesn't exist, if a response is necessary. The leverage factor here is the UN vote. |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Jun 12 2011, 11:07 PM Post #149 |
|
I agree. I can't believe Obama will get as much support(votes & money) from the US Jewish Community in 2012. He is becoming the odd duck out. If the economy doesn't improve dramatically his political capital diminishes on the Hill and members of his own party will move into a protect my azz mode distancing themselves from Obama's pro Palestinian viewpoint and economic policies. In the end Congress members want to be re-elected. They saw what happen to Democratic Congress in 2010. JMO |
![]() |
|
| Rusty Dog | Jun 13 2011, 09:05 AM Post #150 |
|
I think Israel should agree to talks based on the 1967 lines. The lines as of June 10, 1967 that is. http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Facts+About+Israel/Israel+in+Maps/June+10-+1967-+Israel+After+the+Six+Day+War.htm |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · LIESTOPPERS UNDERGROUND · Next Topic » |






7:50 PM Jul 10