- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| KC on Duke's Factual, Semi-Factual, & Non-Factual Response | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 15 2011, 04:58 PM (841 Views) | |
| MikeZPU | Apr 16 2011, 07:38 PM Post #16 |
|
In addition, Kethra noted that Levicy & Manly could not make the diagnosis of diffuse endema because she did not have a baseline for Mangum to compare with. And here's some more fun: Levicy herself disputed the diffuse edema claim in her January 2007 statement to Linwood Wilson. She ascribed the diffuse edema diagnosis to Manly, but stated that since Manly was not a SANE, the finding of diffuse edema should NOT be considered a SANE finding. Here's what's written in Levicy's January 10, 2007 statement to Linwood: "Ms. Levicy stated that on her Medical History Form, Step 10 - Page 1 under Section D. Pelvic Subsection B: Vagina: the writing saying "diffuse edema of the vagina walls" was written in by Dr. Manly and therefore is not a forensic finding since it was not from a SANE nurse." So, Levicy herself backed away from the claim of diffuse edema. ![]() Edited by MikeZPU, Apr 16 2011, 07:51 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() Our users say it best: "Zetaboards is the best forum service I have ever used." Learn More · Sign-up Now |
|
| « Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2








3:28 AM Jul 11