| CGM's boyfriend died.; RIP Reginald Daye | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 13 2011, 07:30 PM (23,353 Views) | |
| Quasimodo | Apr 16 2011, 12:13 AM Post #451 |
|
Who was in charge of the study, Dr. Potti? |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Apr 16 2011, 01:02 AM Post #452 |
|
I know we are all waiting for the Mahrud Event(Durham spelled backwards), but i don't care what happened before. She is in BIg Trouble. A Man is dead and she is alledged to have stabbed him 7 times. Anyway you cut it a Jury will want to know why, even in Durham. |
![]() |
|
| Mason | Apr 16 2011, 01:30 AM Post #453 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. Yes, but she was a Good Mother 4 short months ago. . . Edited by Mason, Apr 16 2011, 01:33 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Rullie | Apr 16 2011, 01:53 AM Post #454 |
|
Let us imagine for a moment, a competent prosecutor presenting the scenario of Daye being attacked to a jury. The competent prosecutor would be standing before the jury, the knife entered in evidence in hand, thrusting it savagely seven times into an object, while describing the moment of the act of murder using the timeline as entered in testimony. That, done properly would awaken any sleeping jury to the evil that occurred that night. Is there a competent prosecutor or Judge in all of Durham county???? We haven't seen one in six years, expect no miracles. |
![]() |
|
| kbp | Apr 16 2011, 02:58 AM Post #455 |
|
If the autopsy shows an infection Crystal created within his body was to have been the cause of his death, would Crystal be guilty if that infection had nothing to do with the stabbing? Just kiddin' |
![]() |
|
| psych | Apr 16 2011, 07:47 AM Post #456 |
|
Walt, If this is the case, how come Cooper decided on his own not to pursue charges without getting an expert opinion on Crystal's insanity? Maybe Cline can do the same. She can say that Crystal keeps on believing her changing stories, so they cannot charge her. |
![]() |
|
| foxglove | Apr 16 2011, 08:04 AM Post #457 |
|
Daye might have had those three cardiac arrests because he was taken off life support three times. IOW, attempts were made to take him off life support only to have to return him to life support. Finally it was decided to keep him off life support and then he died. Did his EKG flat-line after taking him off life support? Is that what is meant by cardiac arrest? |
![]() |
|
| foxglove | Apr 16 2011, 08:07 AM Post #458 |
|
Even if Daye had an underlying heart condition, he could have lived many years with it. The stabbing would still be the reason he died. Edited by foxglove, Apr 16 2011, 08:18 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| foxglove | Apr 16 2011, 08:13 AM Post #459 |
|
If Daye had been on life support from the beginning, it could mean he was essentially already dead and just being kept alive with life support. |
![]() |
|
| psych | Apr 16 2011, 08:19 AM Post #460 |
|
As a physician who does consults at a med surg hospital, it is not so easy to transfer patients. Just think of some of the issues. Does the patient or his family want the transfer or do they want to stay where they are? Is there a receiving facility that is willing to accept the patient? If you were the receiving facility, would you want to accept the patient? If you were a member of Mr. Daye's family would you want him transferred from DUMC? I think not. What's his insurance? Is the receiving facility capable of caring the patient? Do they offer something Duke doesn’t? My first question would be if I was the receiving facility is why do you want to transfer this patient? I am always a skeptic. I would be cautious not to accept a patient that was being "dumped" on me for the wrong reasons. Was Mr. Daye even capable of being safely transported? Would DUMC say that they were transferring him because they were not capable of providing the services he needed? There are ETMALA provisions of The COBRA law that protect us from being transferred to another medical facility without being first medically stabilized for the wrong reasons. I would tend to believe, that the doctors involved in Mr. Daye's care would have preferred not to be involved, since there may even be the possibility they could be called into court to have to testify. It is not something most physicians want to do. |
![]() |
|
| Mason | Apr 16 2011, 08:32 AM Post #461 |
|
Parts unknown
|
.
|
![]() |
|
| agatha | Apr 16 2011, 08:53 AM Post #462 |
|
That is why I asked if it was life support because of a flat EEG or was he on a respirator like 90% of those in ICU. One prolongs life after brain death. One supports life when there is still a chance (no matter how small) for some type of recovery. The devil is in the details. The cardiac arrests could have happened while on the respirator. After the 3rd code, the family could have decided he has suffered enough, changed him to a DNR, disconnected the respirator and he may have coded again resulting in his death. Make no mistake, in my non-legal mind he died as a resut of being stabbed 7 times. It would make no difference if he bled to death before the EMTs arrived or (as in this case) after medical intervention was unsuccessful. I am trying to see how Woody might try to play this. Daye was able to talk to LE after the stabbing if reports are true. The narrative might be something like "Daye was alert sfter the stabbing. He was able to go to his nephew's apartment. He was able to talk to the cops. It was only after his admission to DUMC that Reginald Daye's status changed. Blah. Blah. Blah" He will put DUMC on trial. If he takes that route think of who he wants on the jury. By the time jury selection comes around the jury pool will not just be tainted, it wil be polluted. Onondaga Lake polluted. |
![]() |
|
| jmoo | Apr 16 2011, 08:54 AM Post #463 |
|
Could 7 stab wounds = premeditation? Seems to me there have been cases where premeditation was found to have occurred during the course of the actions that resulted in the death, no? eta - in other words, it is my understanding that premeditation doesn't require a great amount of thinking/time, can be just a short period of time when the accused has time to consider the effect of their actions. Edited by jmoo, Apr 16 2011, 09:21 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| abb | Apr 16 2011, 08:58 AM Post #464 |
|
This is why the first, earlier visit by the cops is important, I think. We need to know what happened and what what said by whom. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Apr 16 2011, 09:26 AM Post #465 |
|
Deleted User
|
This sounds like a job for N.C.'s favorite son, John Edwards. He could channel your argument right to a conviction. |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic » |






3:28 AM Jul 11