Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Remaining Defendants and Counts in Civil Suits; Judge Beaty Retains Some, Drops Others
Topic Started: Mar 31 2011, 08:15 PM (1,531 Views)
kbp

Payback
Apr 3 2011, 07:51 PM
Quasimodo
Apr 3 2011, 04:57 PM
Payback
Apr 3 2011, 11:25 AM
a billboard showing what Brodhead was costing Duke? If we could only have that as a LieStopper logo.
Posted Image
I am inordinately fond of this. In fact, I love this and wish I could see it full size, :biggrin: in real life. :biggrin: :smilfacak:
I hate to ruin your joy here, but it is photoshop work.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
MikeZPU

Quasimodo
Apr 3 2011, 04:57 PM
Payback
Apr 3 2011, 11:25 AM
a billboard showing what Brodhead was costing Duke? If we could only have that as a LieStopper logo.
Posted Image
I LOVE this idea! A billboard with a running digital counter showing how
many millions Brodhead has caused the university, updating continuously :)

... because the facts kept changing, because there may be an intermediate explanation,
because he could not allow himself to view the mountain of exculpatory evidence but
could listen to a 911 call from an unidentified person and accept her claims with no question, etc
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Walt-in-Durham

MikeZPU
Apr 3 2011, 07:49 PM
I wonder if Walt can give us a clarification on one particular statement by KC:

"As I noted yesterday, the university did score a victory in the dismissal of claims against the most virulently anti-lacrosse member of the upper administration, Larry Moneta, who would have been a disaster for the university in any deposition."

Even if the claims against Moneta are dismissed, isn't there still the possibility that he can be deposed?
Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow depositions of non-parties. (State rules do to.) KC is simply wrong about Moneta not being subject to deposition. I commented on his site to that effect. I wonder if he posted the comment? In any case, the FRCP allow deposition of anyone who might have evidence or information that might lead to admissable evidence. A very broad standard.

Walt-in-Durham
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
MikeZPU

Walt-in-Durham
Apr 3 2011, 07:59 PM
MikeZPU
Apr 3 2011, 07:49 PM
I wonder if Walt can give us a clarification on one particular statement by KC:

"As I noted yesterday, the university did score a victory in the dismissal of claims against the most virulently anti-lacrosse member of the upper administration, Larry Moneta, who would have been a disaster for the university in any deposition."

Even if the claims against Moneta are dismissed, isn't there still the possibility that he can be deposed?
Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow depositions of non-parties. (State rules do to.) KC is simply wrong about Moneta not being subject to deposition. I commented on his site to that effect. I wonder if he posted the comment? In any case, the FRCP allow deposition of anyone who might have evidence or information that might lead to admissable evidence. A very broad standard.

Walt-in-Durham
Thanks Walt for the quick reply.

Thanks for the countless number of times that you share your extensive expertise in all things legal :)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Walt-in-Durham

No problem Mike. One obligation of an attorney is to help educate the public about the law. Another is to seek justice. I view this site as helping to fulfill both obligations.

Walt-in-Durham
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
~J~ is in Wonderland
Member Avatar
~J~ is in Wonderland
Quasimodo
Apr 3 2011, 04:57 PM
Payback
Apr 3 2011, 11:25 AM
a billboard showing what Brodhead was costing Duke? If we could only have that as a LieStopper logo.
Posted Image
Walt, considering the big stink thats going on in Durham about billboards-this would be a perfect time for one of these.

:partspin:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic »
Add Reply