| Duke Lacrosse Lawsuits to Move Forward, Judge Rules; Discovery ahead !! | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 31 2011, 04:21 PM (12,248 Views) | |
| ~J~ is in Wonderland | Mar 31 2011, 08:22 PM Post #91 |
|
~J~ is in Wonderland
|
I can't keep up with all the threads on this.
|
![]() |
|
| Payback | Mar 31 2011, 08:28 PM Post #92 |
|
I've been wondering that for 2 hours. Maybe he is basking in the sun--you know it got up to 90 or more out here. There will be a ROAR when he turns on his computer. |
![]() |
|
| jmoo | Mar 31 2011, 08:30 PM Post #93 |
|
abb - did you load these? if i send you the carrington opinion can you load & provide a link? |
![]() |
|
| I'mstillaRebel | Mar 31 2011, 08:34 PM Post #94 |
|
what a gloriously happy day! Duke has spent a fortune in legal fees to avoid discovery--should be interesting watching their next moves. ...the wheels of justice grind slowly--but at last they are grinding!!!!! |
![]() |
|
| ~J~ is in Wonderland | Mar 31 2011, 08:43 PM Post #95 |
|
~J~ is in Wonderland
|
baldo is on his way!! we have been waiting for you ..... |
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Mar 31 2011, 08:52 PM Post #96 |
|
MacFayden:
This is apparently the only count remaining against Steel; but "obstruction of justice" may be enough... |
![]() |
|
| ~J~ is in Wonderland | Mar 31 2011, 08:52 PM Post #97 |
|
~J~ is in Wonderland
|
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/9366400/ Judge rules in second federal lawsuit in Duke lacrosse case The City of Durham issued a statement late Thursday saying it is "gratified" the court has narrowed the issues raised in the cases. "We believe the court correctly dismissed the punitive damages claims against the city and are pleased and encouraged by that favorable determination," Durham Public Affairs Director Beverly Thompson said. "The city's legal counsel look forward to studying today's decisions in greater detail and remain optimistic that the cases will ultimately be decided in favor of the city and its personnel." Edited by ~J~ is in Wonderland, Mar 31 2011, 08:54 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Payback | Mar 31 2011, 08:54 PM Post #98 |
|
Baldo is reading! |
![]() |
|
| Kerri P. | Mar 31 2011, 08:58 PM Post #99 |
|
from the same article. snip....
snip...... |
![]() |
|
| chatham | Mar 31 2011, 08:59 PM Post #100 |
|
This could also have implications in the Potti suits depending on the outcome. |
![]() |
|
| DMom | Mar 31 2011, 09:07 PM Post #101 |
|
http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/03/31/1096165/judge-allows-duke-lacrosse-lawsuit.html#storylink=misearch (hard to find @ News and Observer) By MIKE BAKER - Associated Press Tags: NC Duke Lacrosse Lawsuit RALEIGH, N.C. -- A federal judge is allowing three former Duke lacrosse players falsely accused of rape to pursue a civil lawsuit against the prosecutor and police investigators who handled their case. U.S. District Judge James Beaty ruled Thursday that the players can pursue claims such as malicious prosecution, concealment of evidence and fabrication of false evidence. He dismissed several other claims. //snip// Read more: http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/03/31/1096165/judge-allows-duke-lacrosse-lawsuit.html#storylink=misearch#ixzz1IEWDH0iY |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Mar 31 2011, 09:12 PM Post #102 |
|
It is really very early to make a detailed analysis. There is much to read through. But no doubt Oh, somewhere in this favored land the sun is shining bright; The band is playing somewhere, and somewhere hearts are light, And somewhere men are laughing, and somewhere children shout; But there is no joy in Durham — The Miscreants have struck out! Now let's find out what really happen in Depositions Edited by Baldo, Mar 31 2011, 09:12 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| I'mstillaRebel | Mar 31 2011, 09:15 PM Post #103 |
|
something to smile about as you toddle off to bed--- picture Wahaneema on a witness stand.......... |
![]() |
|
| DMom | Mar 31 2011, 09:17 PM Post #104 |
|
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/03/31/2187763/judge-allows-duke-lacrosse-lawsuit.html#storylink=misearch (also, difficult to find article in N&O 'sister paper") (same AP reporter, not local) Judge allows Duke lacrosse lawsuit to go forward By MIKE BAKER Associated Press Posted: Thursday, Mar. 31, 2011 RALEIGH, N.C. A federal judge is allowing three former Duke lacrosse players falsely accused of rape to pursue a civil lawsuit against the North Carolina county prosecutor and police investigators who handled their case. U.S. District Judge James Beaty ruled Thursday that the players can pursue claims such as malicious prosecution, concealment of evidence and fabrication of false evidence. He dismissed several other claims. An attorney for former District Attorney Mike Nifong and a spokeswoman for the Durham Police Department didn't immediately return calls seeking comment. Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and Dave Evans were indicted by a Durham County grand jury in 2006 on charges of rape, kidnapping and sexual offense. North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper later dropped the charges, declaring the players innocent victims of a "tragic rush to accuse." |
![]() |
|
| Payback | Mar 31 2011, 09:28 PM Post #105 |
|
with a wheelbarrow to carry all her forthcoming publications |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic » |







3:30 AM Jul 11