| Barack Obama is Brilliant Thread; HUH? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 3 2011, 11:12 PM (16,476 Views) | |
| kbp | Mar 30 2011, 01:02 PM Post #76 |
|
Problem solved!
Increase oil production to help maintain or reduce price increases, while working to develop more biofuels that ONLY compete with oil if the oil price increases much higher than it presently is ....or subsidize that cost variance. Meanwhile, brag about the Executive order that must somehow make it a law mandating that by 2015 ALL vehicles will use that new fuel ...the fuel we evidently "have to discover and produce", also known as "stuff" when the teleprompter isn't handy. Edited by kbp, Mar 30 2011, 01:03 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Mar 30 2011, 11:37 PM Post #77 |
|
Meanwhile it looks like Obama's popularity is starting to wane. Poll: Obama's approval hits new low President Barack Obama’s approval rating and prospects for reelection have plunged to all-time lows in a Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday. Half of the registered voters surveyed for the poll think that the president does not deserve a second term in office, while 41 percent say he does. In another Quinnipiac poll released just four weeks ago, 45 percent said the president did not deserve reelection, while 47 percent said he did.The decline in support for a second Obama term comes as his approval rating has dropped 4 percentage points since early March, landing at 42 percent – a record low – in the poll released Wednesday. His disapproval rating has risen from 46 percent to 48 percent..snipped http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52208.html |
![]() |
|
| kbp | Mar 31 2011, 10:08 AM Post #78 |
|
Back to Obama's brilliant energy plan, here's an excerpt of interest that displays it well; "Energy Secretary Steven Chu, seeking to explain why Obama's push for energy independence would succeed where others had failed, said Obama's timeline is realistic given recent advances in the clean energy sector. "I think technologically, we're much closer than we ever were," he told reporters at the White House." More promises for blue skies in the near future! This is just a continuation of that new "green market" Obama's crews are inventing for us ....with our dollars! The hypothetical theory that we will soon succeed with that miraculous answer to our energy needs through that science or industry or whatever it was Obama meant to tell us when he had to identify it as "STUFF" the days we were without the TOTUS. The quote above came from Obama to detail U.S. energy security strategy Just for grins, a part of Obama on the defensive, where he has been quite a bit since that stimulus failed! The president struck back at that criticism during his speech, noting that his administration has approved 39 shallow-water drilling permits since new standards were put in place last year following the Gulf oil spill, and seven new deep-water drilling permits in recent weeks. "So any claim that my administration is responsible for gas prices because we've shut down oil production might make for a useful political sound bite, but doesn't track with reality," Obama said. |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Mar 31 2011, 12:45 PM Post #79 |
|
Obama says the right things over and over again, but he is just lying. He says what is politically correct to different constituencies then his administration hinders anything that isn't "Green." That man is just leading us into higher & higher energy costs and I predict scarities will follow.. |
![]() |
|
| kbp | Mar 31 2011, 02:43 PM Post #80 |
|
We have no Mobama is Brilliant Thread. Gallup: Michelle Obama’s Former Congressional District Dead Last for ‘Healthy Behavior’ Maybe they just need mo money! |
![]() |
|
| Mason | Mar 31 2011, 02:57 PM Post #81 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. We have to be at the point now that it's clear to people paying attention that Obama is not a producer. He doesn't produce, he's all about high-level ephemeral big ideas that he has no clue (and maybe no care) how to deliver on. It's all Sizzle and No Steak. I think his handlers may have calculated that there are diminishing returns for actually producing - in contrast to whipping up crowds with hyperbole and wild promises of greatness. Obama promised on and on and again and again about his streamlining of Government and elimination of Waste and Fraud. His Government was going to be different. Like Schooling that includes measurables and quantifiables - it's boring to Messiah Obama (and it also tends to expose him). We found out for all the talk of his Government Efficiency and elimination of fraud and waste - it turns out Obama's Gov't used a lot more energy (and gasoline) than previous administrations. Does he ask more of his "employees"? Does he ask for accountability and a review of his Streamlined Government? No, he announces More Money $$$$$ be sucked into a New Mandate he laid down (regarding Fuel efficiencey and alternative fuel) that will go into effect months before he departs office, if he manages a 2nd term. The guy knows it's easier to go out and give a grandiose speech rather than actually have to produce and show results. Don't look for any production or results from this man. He rode in on his Special Powers and he looks to be leaving with a bunch of fantastic promises as his legacy. . Edited by Mason, Mar 31 2011, 02:59 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| wingedwheel | Mar 31 2011, 04:00 PM Post #82 |
|
Not Pictured Above
|
So not only is 0bama's city a dangerous place to live, but they also have unhealthy behaviors. Maybe next time the democrats nominate a community |
![]() |
|
| Mason | Mar 31 2011, 05:05 PM Post #83 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. I don't even think Mobama's Garden was safe. Something Toxic turned up there with her Giant Vegetables. I don't know how the trust factor could get any lower, I don't believe anything coming out of there anymore. This is all empire building. If they take no stand on exercise or health, then that's one last thing they need money for. They are expanding. Everything is in their purview and they need money for everything. Cradle to Grave. Edited by Mason, Mar 31 2011, 05:07 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| kbp | Mar 31 2011, 06:36 PM Post #84 |
|
Baldo just reminded of another brilliant move bu Obama; the debt commission. The sad part is that it was actually a good idea ...couldn't hurt, might help ...but Obama ignored what his group told him to do. Maybe the Republicans need to re-assemble that group. Edited by kbp, Mar 31 2011, 06:37 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| kbp | Apr 3 2011, 04:51 PM Post #85 |
|
Skip all he has shown us to illustrate that he does not believe that ENERGY from fossil fuels are a no no, and looks how East, West and North coasts are out for drilling. He still has a desire to create a new 'green' market as HIS way of reducing our "foreign oil dependence". |
![]() |
|
| kbp | Apr 3 2011, 09:54 PM Post #86 |
|
This one falls under "opportunity" for brilliance. Samantha Power to be the next Secretary of State? It's bad enough we're not sure if an American is POTUS, but toss in some radical Irish activist, one who hopes to use World Order for world peace, and I'd say were seeing the opportunity for another brilliant move. |
![]() |
|
| Acc Esq | Apr 4 2011, 11:51 AM Post #87 |
|
How about Samantha Brown? She has a lot of experience traveling around foreign countries. http://www.travelchannel.com/TV_Shows/Samantha_Brown |
![]() |
|
| LTC8K6 | Apr 4 2011, 01:31 PM Post #88 |
|
Assistant to The Devil Himself
|
Is she even eligible? The SOS is in the line of succession. Or don't they even bother to check anymore? |
![]() |
|
| cks | Apr 4 2011, 03:28 PM Post #89 |
|
It would not matter what her nationality is. She would be skipped over - just as Kissinger would have been skipped over when he served as Nixon's Secretary of State. There is neither a residency or natural citizenship requirement for any cabinet official. I suppose that the Senate, which confirms all appointments at this level could refuse to confirm based on some perceived notion that the person is not sufficiently schooled in US history, foreign policy, etc. But, there are no formal constitutional requirements for someone to hold a cabinet position. |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Apr 4 2011, 03:49 PM Post #90 |
|
As bad as the Senate Democrats are they couldn't be that stupid, could they? Samantha Power?? Pardon me for being politically incorrect. But with the Middle East on fire and the way they treat women as a second class citizens is it no surprise that our female Secretaries of State haven't exactly been a big hit there from either party headed back to Madeleine Albright. I am a big believer in women and equality, but sometimes you just got to take into considerations who are you dealing with. You are talking about a portion of the world where men rule with an iron fist over women and I doubt the Arab leaders take HRC serious. Now maybe Golda Meir or Margaret Thatcher, but wow what leaders! Edited by Baldo, Apr 4 2011, 03:49 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · LIESTOPPERS UNDERGROUND · Next Topic » |







2:34 PM Jul 11