Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
CRYSTAL MANGUM TRIAL; December 2010
Topic Started: Nov 29 2010, 12:59 PM (56,580 Views)
Mason
Member Avatar
Parts unknown
abb
Dec 21 2010, 07:36 AM

Wagstaff's jail time cut short

DURHAM Former City Councilwoman Jackie Wagstaff will go free..

Mason
Dec 17 2010, 09:52 PM
.
The Judge said Crystal is a GOOD MOTHER!

OMG! Beam me up. This is too much!

The Wagstaff thing was theatrics!



,

.
Please see that Last Line above, and check the Date and Time of the Posts. I said it the day he "sentenced" her. It was theatrics designed to bury the fact he was blessing Crystal as a Good Mother and undercutting DSS purposefully.



.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mason
Member Avatar
Parts unknown
Mason
Dec 17 2010, 09:23 PM
,
Now, I'm willing to bet that Wagstaff doesn't see any 10 days.

Judge Jones visits her this weekend and brings her dinner and tells her not to worry.




.
. :uhoh: :uhoh: :uhoh: :uhoh: :uhoh: :uhoh: :uhoh: :uhoh:

Durham Justice is Easy to Predict. Prediction just after the Verdict was handed down.

She gets NO Fine, as in Zero.



.
Edited by Mason, Dec 21 2010, 07:55 AM.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Quasimodo

How much time in jail for contempt did the black panther who repeatedly made
death threats in court while other panthers were outside making similarly suggestive threats,
get from the Durham court?

(Reporters who were present actually feared he was about to physically assault
the defendant in the court.)

What was his fine?

(If you can't answer this one correctly, you need to go back and repeat
the course on "Durham justice".)

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Quasimodo

Was no one in Durham interviewed about the sentencing of Wagstaff?

Was no one at Duke interviewed about the sentencing of Mangum? (Barber? Irv Joyner? Al McSurely?)

Did no one in the city have any comments about these two events?

If you read the HS and the N&O, you'd get the impression these two cases happened
in a vacuum--that no one at Duke ever heard of Mangum. After being so involved in defending
her accusations?

(And where is Jesse Jackson? No comments on how her post-college life is turning out?) Did
anyone in the media even think to ask (even if only to get a "no comment" response?)

(and--still waiting for that apology to Duke from NCCU, that one of their students
lied about and falsely accused some Duke students, leading to a horrific year...)
Edited by Quasimodo, Dec 21 2010, 08:57 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

So old Jackie writes her letter from the Birmingham/Durham jail and the judge capitulates in the spirit of Christmas. Yea, old Jackie and the Durham enablers are really down for the struggle all right.I recall in a press conference that Wade Smith asked Mike Nifong to virtually do the same thing for RDC. It was December 2006 and Smith before the cameras called on Nifong to do the "right thing".
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Quasimodo


Quote:
 
(and--still waiting for that apology to Duke from NCCU, that one of their students
lied about and falsely accused some Duke students, leading to a horrific year...)


Quote:
 
http://durhamwonderland.blogspot.com/2009/04/mangum-at-unc-audience-questions-to-be.html

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 22, 2009
Mangum at UNC, Audience Questions To Be Censored

In what is nothing short of an extraordinary decision, UNC’s Sonja Haynes Stone Center has chosen to host serial fabricator Crystal Mangum at the University of North Carolina tonight, at 6.30pm, in a gathering devoted to “social injustice” and “the harsh realities of minority treatment both in the justice system and the media.” The sponsoring organization is here.

(If any DIW readers in the Triangle attend this event, please send me a summary and I will post it tomorrow.)

In an equally extraordinary development, the Daily Tar Heel reports that “following Mangum’s speech will be a question-and-answer session with the audience. Questions will be submitted beforehand to organizers to prevent questions related to the Duke lacrosse team.”

Questions that should be asked:

How much money did Ms. Magnum receive from the state of North Carolina victims’ assistance fund?

Will Ms. Mangum release—as her defender, Wendy Murphy, has essentially demanded—her 1000-page psychological case file?

How many meetings and phone calls with Mike Nifong did Ms. Mangum have, and how often did they discuss the case in these phone calls?

Given that her “book” still claims that an attack occurred, how does Ms. Magnum explain away the fact that not only does no evidence exist to corroborate her myriad, mutually contradictory tales, but that overwhelming exculpatory evidence exists to prove the innocence of the accused? Does Ms. Mangum still believe that Duke doctored the party photos, as she told state prosecutors? Does she believe that Wachovia doctored the ATM videotape of Reade Seligmann? Does she believe, as Nifong’s defenders have claimed, that other witnesses in the case were bribed to exonerate the lacrosse players? How does she interpret the DNA evidence finding no traces of any of the players but matches to multiple unidentified men?

Given that the AG stated Ms. Mangum did not face prosecution for filing a false police report in part because of a fear of community reaction, does she believe that a racial disparity exists regarding the treatment of false accusers by the justice system?

Does Ms. Mangum feel any sense of regret at having falsely led on the people and groups—from Nifong to the Group of 88—who sought to exploit her case for their own ends?

And, perhaps most important, will Ms. Mangum issue a public apology to the three people she falsely accused?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mason
Member Avatar
Parts unknown
.
How much you wanna bet Wagstaff was told on Saturday or Sunday that they had her back and not to worry?

It's easy to see through.

Just like those 3 charges - all for show.

.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Quasimodo

Mason
Dec 21 2010, 09:32 AM
.
How much you wanna bet Wagstaff was told on Saturday or Sunday that they had her back and not to worry?

It's easy to see through.

Just like those 3 charges - all for show.

.
How much you wanna bet Mangum was told she had nothing to worry
about?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
genny6348
Genny6348
from Instapundit

Quote:
 
DUKE LACROSSE RAPE HOAXER convicted of child abuse.

The university took action against the team, all on the word of this woman. DA Mike Nifong took action, ignoring evidence that might exonerate the team members. The purported victim was black and female, so evidence was superfluous to the forces of PC.

It all fell apart, thank goodness, or otherwise innocent young men might have suffered even further merely because they were white, male, affluent, and jocks — and that alone is a crime in the minds of many on the left.

Now the woman who made the false accusations, Crystal Mangum (whose name was kept from the public while the lacrosse players were publicly identified and pilloried on campus and in the press), has been convicted of child abuse, injury of personal property, and resisting arrest in Durham, NC.

The Gang Of 88 was unavailable for comment.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

According to Blatherly's blog, he was going to go down to the jail on Saturday to take her some money. Really? Who needs money when they are in jail after all Jackie had three meals and a cot what else did she need.

Interesting also that Garrell was fired during this same period.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

I had anticipated she would be released Saturday morning, after a single night in jail.

The downside now is she's more of a 'victim' than she was before they locked her up. She'll strut with a little more pride now ....in certain crowds.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
MikeZPU

kbp
Dec 21 2010, 10:16 AM
I had anticipated she would be released Saturday morning, after a single night in jail.

The downside now is she's more of a 'victim' than she was before they locked her up. She'll strut with a little more pride now ....in certain crowds.
At least it was an AA judge that threw her in jail, the same judge
that called Mangum a good mother.

Yes, I know: she'll point to the Scotty Hodges as the white oppressor.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Payback
Member Avatar

Maybe the judge thought Wagstaff was a good mother.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
MikeZPU

Payback
Dec 21 2010, 12:09 PM
Maybe the judge thought Wagstaff was a good mother.
Well, she wasn't found guilty of abusing her own children,
so there wasn't as much convincing evidence of her being
a good mother as there was with Mangum. :bump: :bump: :bump:
Edited by MikeZPU, Dec 21 2010, 12:25 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mason
Member Avatar
Parts unknown
.
Wagstaff's note didn't reach a Superior court Judge by handing it to a guard. Things don't work like that.

A lawyer had to intervene, or the Judge visited her of his own accord.

Do judges give defendants breaks this week? That answer would be - NO.

Are Judges normally hard to get ahold of in that courtroom? Yes.
Next to impossible during Christmas week. And that would for someone like a DA.

What lawyer intervened on Wagstaff's part?

Everyone in jail has a personal crisis - but they get no avenue to "speak" to a Judge. As with everything else around there, we are getting half the story.


Edited by Mason, Dec 21 2010, 09:18 PM.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Enjoy forums? Start your own community for free.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic »
Add Reply