| CRYSTAL MANGUM TRIAL; December 2010 | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 29 2010, 12:59 PM (56,580 Views) | |
| Mason | Dec 21 2010, 07:48 AM Post #1321 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. Please see that Last Line above, and check the Date and Time of the Posts. I said it the day he "sentenced" her. It was theatrics designed to bury the fact he was blessing Crystal as a Good Mother and undercutting DSS purposefully. . |
![]() |
|
| Mason | Dec 21 2010, 07:52 AM Post #1322 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. Durham Justice is Easy to Predict. Prediction just after the Verdict was handed down. She gets NO Fine, as in Zero. . Edited by Mason, Dec 21 2010, 07:55 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Dec 21 2010, 08:35 AM Post #1323 |
|
How much time in jail for contempt did the black panther who repeatedly made death threats in court while other panthers were outside making similarly suggestive threats, get from the Durham court? (Reporters who were present actually feared he was about to physically assault the defendant in the court.) What was his fine? (If you can't answer this one correctly, you need to go back and repeat the course on "Durham justice".) |
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Dec 21 2010, 08:52 AM Post #1324 |
|
Was no one in Durham interviewed about the sentencing of Wagstaff? Was no one at Duke interviewed about the sentencing of Mangum? (Barber? Irv Joyner? Al McSurely?) Did no one in the city have any comments about these two events? If you read the HS and the N&O, you'd get the impression these two cases happened in a vacuum--that no one at Duke ever heard of Mangum. After being so involved in defending her accusations? (And where is Jesse Jackson? No comments on how her post-college life is turning out?) Did anyone in the media even think to ask (even if only to get a "no comment" response?) (and--still waiting for that apology to Duke from NCCU, that one of their students lied about and falsely accused some Duke students, leading to a horrific year...) Edited by Quasimodo, Dec 21 2010, 08:57 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 21 2010, 09:05 AM Post #1325 |
|
Deleted User
|
So old Jackie writes her letter from the Birmingham/Durham jail and the judge capitulates in the spirit of Christmas. Yea, old Jackie and the Durham enablers are really down for the struggle all right.I recall in a press conference that Wade Smith asked Mike Nifong to virtually do the same thing for RDC. It was December 2006 and Smith before the cameras called on Nifong to do the "right thing". |
|
|
| Quasimodo | Dec 21 2010, 09:05 AM Post #1326 |
|
|
![]() |
|
| Mason | Dec 21 2010, 09:32 AM Post #1327 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. How much you wanna bet Wagstaff was told on Saturday or Sunday that they had her back and not to worry? It's easy to see through. Just like those 3 charges - all for show. . |
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Dec 21 2010, 09:34 AM Post #1328 |
|
How much you wanna bet Mangum was told she had nothing to worry about? |
![]() |
|
| genny6348 | Dec 21 2010, 10:05 AM Post #1329 |
|
Genny6348
|
from Instapundit
|
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 21 2010, 10:12 AM Post #1330 |
|
Deleted User
|
According to Blatherly's blog, he was going to go down to the jail on Saturday to take her some money. Really? Who needs money when they are in jail after all Jackie had three meals and a cot what else did she need. Interesting also that Garrell was fired during this same period. |
|
|
| kbp | Dec 21 2010, 10:16 AM Post #1331 |
|
I had anticipated she would be released Saturday morning, after a single night in jail. The downside now is she's more of a 'victim' than she was before they locked her up. She'll strut with a little more pride now ....in certain crowds. |
![]() |
|
| MikeZPU | Dec 21 2010, 11:57 AM Post #1332 |
|
At least it was an AA judge that threw her in jail, the same judge that called Mangum a good mother. Yes, I know: she'll point to the Scotty Hodges as the white oppressor. |
![]() |
|
| Payback | Dec 21 2010, 12:09 PM Post #1333 |
|
Maybe the judge thought Wagstaff was a good mother. |
![]() |
|
| MikeZPU | Dec 21 2010, 12:20 PM Post #1334 |
|
Well, she wasn't found guilty of abusing her own children, so there wasn't as much convincing evidence of her being a good mother as there was with Mangum.
Edited by MikeZPU, Dec 21 2010, 12:25 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Mason | Dec 21 2010, 09:15 PM Post #1335 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. Wagstaff's note didn't reach a Superior court Judge by handing it to a guard. Things don't work like that. A lawyer had to intervene, or the Judge visited her of his own accord. Do judges give defendants breaks this week? That answer would be - NO. Are Judges normally hard to get ahold of in that courtroom? Yes. Next to impossible during Christmas week. And that would for someone like a DA. What lawyer intervened on Wagstaff's part? Everyone in jail has a personal crisis - but they get no avenue to "speak" to a Judge. As with everything else around there, we are getting half the story. Edited by Mason, Dec 21 2010, 09:18 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic » |







3:32 AM Jul 11