| CRYSTAL MANGUM TRIAL; December 2010 | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 29 2010, 12:59 PM (56,594 Views) | |
| Mason | Dec 17 2010, 09:49 PM Post #1111 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. Wagstaff's friend, Jury Foreperson, Shauna is the source for the jury tabulation (9-3 to acquit). She is giving interviews to multiple media outlets - and trashing the prosecution. . |
![]() |
|
| Mason | Dec 17 2010, 09:52 PM Post #1112 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. The Judge said Crystal is a GOOD MOTHER! OMG! Beam me up. This is too much! The Wagstaff thing was theatrics! , |
![]() |
|
| nyesq83 | Dec 17 2010, 09:52 PM Post #1113 |
|
This case started with overcharging, and Mangum's video (first denying, then confessing) allowed jurors to have reasonable doubt, combine that with confusion over the instructions. |
![]() |
|
| nyesq83 | Dec 17 2010, 09:52 PM Post #1114 |
|
Durm justice rules again. thanks to all for reporting! Edited by nyesq83, Dec 17 2010, 09:53 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| wingedwheel | Dec 17 2010, 09:53 PM Post #1115 |
|
Not Pictured Above
|
That post makes me think about a story I seen the other day. Apparently Michael Vick wants a dog again. So would you rather have Vick watch your animals or Mangum watch your kids? |
![]() |
|
| Mason | Dec 17 2010, 09:56 PM Post #1116 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. I'm sorry - how did we get the point where Crystal is a good Mother? The debris all over the Apartment? No furniture? Her admitting to setting the fire, destroying his car, and making threats in front of the Police? I'm sorry. This is way beyond ridiculous. . Edited by Mason, Dec 17 2010, 09:56 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 17 2010, 09:58 PM Post #1117 |
|
Deleted User
|
Am I nuts or did the jury really vote 9-3 for acquital. I have looked back to page 67 or 68 and I thought the vote was 9-3 for conviction. There were numerous posts suggesting that Crystal must be nervous thinking that 9 out of12 people wanted to convict her. Did we all misunderstand or is it just me. |
|
|
| Quasimodo | Dec 17 2010, 10:00 PM Post #1118 |
|
|
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Dec 17 2010, 10:01 PM Post #1119 |
|
I think it was guesswork as to what the 9-3 meant. I guess now we know... Edited by Quasimodo, Dec 17 2010, 10:02 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Dec 17 2010, 10:03 PM Post #1120 |
|
I guess Durham got a "Durham solution"... |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 17 2010, 10:05 PM Post #1121 |
|
Deleted User
|
Justice was Nifonged once again. |
|
|
| Mason | Dec 17 2010, 10:07 PM Post #1122 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. Well, you're right. Politically incorrect as it is, it's the Truth. Judge Jones is a fool (he's actually worse, I'm afraid). How does one observe that Trial and declare Crystal a Good Mother? This is just like before, no one wanted to discuss why she needed three drivers and why she doesn't have a driver's license (yet the press repeatedly saw her driving). They call a family friend to report arguing, the kid calls 911, but Crystal can't call 911 instead of setting fires, smashing out windshield's, flattening tires, and threatening to stab someone in front of her kids? Mother of the Year! I think Motherhood has been redefined. . |
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Dec 17 2010, 10:08 PM Post #1123 |
|
Judge Jones himself had been the victim of a female stalker, so I thought he might have been less amenable to sympathy for women who make false accusations and ruin lives; but evidently not. (MOO) |
![]() |
|
| LTC8K6 | Dec 17 2010, 10:08 PM Post #1124 |
|
Assistant to The Devil Himself
|
She'll be back in court, have no fear. We all know it. One day, maybe she'll be herself in a different jurisdiction. Leopards don't change their spots. |
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Dec 17 2010, 10:13 PM Post #1125 |
|
Don't forget she's also an honor graduate of NCCU! |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic » |







3:32 AM Jul 11