| CRYSTAL MANGUM TRIAL; December 2010 | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 29 2010, 12:59 PM (56,635 Views) | |
| chatham | Dec 16 2010, 12:18 PM Post #496 |
|
As far as crystals pain is concerned. During the playing of the video and the interview by investigator bond, there was no complaints or actions by crystal that indicated to anyone that she was in any pain. The beginning of the video while crystal was by herself for 40 or so minutes, there was no indication that she was in any pain, soreness, limping or moans. She was quiet for most of the time that was shown, but she also walked around a little bit. The indication of pain came after investigator Bond was done with the interview and Bond left the room. After a few minutes of seeing crystal still sitting down with her head on her arms on the table she did start yelling ow ow ow and saying she needed help for back pain. This was the first indication 0of any problem that crystal had with any pains, aches or anything related to her back. She never complained about any pain from the injuries she had received by Milton to the face. The guard who was in the room with her, or came into the room because he heard her, (we could not see the guard right away on the video when crystal starting saying owww) said he would get medics there to look at her and she should sit down and stay quiet. That is all of the tape we saw. The part about crystal on the floor rolling around was verbally presented by investigator bond to the jury. The jury never saw that part of the tape. The defense requested it to be shown but the judge denied that. |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Dec 16 2010, 12:19 PM Post #497 |
|
"Officer" Tyler Has Some Skeletons In His Closet! This from Crystal's supporters? Chutzpah |
![]() |
|
| chatham | Dec 16 2010, 12:19 PM Post #498 |
|
Whatever it was. It was denied. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 16 2010, 12:27 PM Post #499 |
|
Deleted User
|
I wonder if the judge had granted the request and upon review the officers records were excellent then what? This would have been a very risky move on the part of the defense. We do know from the lax case and from the so-called drug bust in Trinity Park in 2008 that warrants are not always the MO of the Durham police. |
|
|
| LTC8K6 | Dec 16 2010, 12:36 PM Post #500 |
|
Assistant to The Devil Himself
|
Sounds like a defense attorney trying to make hay... |
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Dec 16 2010, 12:41 PM Post #501 |
|
Matthew Millikin (Staff reporter, The Herald-Sun), Twitter feed from the court: http://twitter.com/MillikenTHS# -------------------------------------- There's one other spectator besides the journalists, erstwhile Durham City Council candidate Darius Little. 23 minutes ago via TweetDeck -------------------------------------- Jackie Wagstaff just arrived; she is chatting with Mangum, who is smiling and seems in good spirits. -------------------------------------- Mangum, Wagstaff and another woman are now discussing reality-TV shows featuring judges Edited by Quasimodo, Dec 16 2010, 12:46 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Dec 16 2010, 12:45 PM Post #502 |
|
Twitter: Apparently prosecutor Mark McCullough has been called back to court along with Judge Jones. 2 minutes ago via TweetDeck Our first question, it seems. The jury just passed a note to the bailiff. The judge is being summoned to read it. 3 minutes ago via TweetDeck |
![]() |
|
| jmoo | Dec 16 2010, 12:46 PM Post #503 |
|
Prosecution & court reporter just came back in. Not sure if the jury has a question or what.... |
![]() |
|
| ~J~ is in Wonderland | Dec 16 2010, 12:46 PM Post #504 |
|
~J~ is in Wonderland
|
and.......what if the Lacrosse frame had gone to court? The whole world would have seen CGM's mile high medical records. geezzzz- spit.... spit |
![]() |
|
| jmoo | Dec 16 2010, 12:47 PM Post #505 |
|
Court back in session. |
![]() |
|
| ~J~ is in Wonderland | Dec 16 2010, 12:51 PM Post #506 |
|
~J~ is in Wonderland
|
is the jury in the room? |
![]() |
|
| jmoo | Dec 16 2010, 12:53 PM Post #507 |
|
Jury has questions 1) What constitutes a lawful arrest? |
![]() |
|
| jmoo | Dec 16 2010, 12:55 PM Post #508 |
|
Prosecutor believes the question has to do with the jury instructions and argues that they can instruct on law at this point but cannot rewrite the jury instuctions. Arguing whether Crystal communicated a threat. Prosecution says irrelevant -- she was not charged with communicating a threat. |
![]() |
|
| ~J~ is in Wonderland | Dec 16 2010, 12:55 PM Post #509 |
|
~J~ is in Wonderland
|
Where are our lawyers? Whats the meaning of the question re:what they might be thinking? |
![]() |
|
| MikeZPU | Dec 16 2010, 12:57 PM Post #510 |
|
Wow -- on the surface, it's a little scary that they're asking the Judge that ... not good ... Are they questioning whether she should have even be arrested in the first place? Wow ... Edited by MikeZPU, Dec 16 2010, 12:59 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic » |






3:32 AM Jul 11