| CRYSTAL MANGUM TRIAL; December 2010 | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 29 2010, 12:59 PM (56,643 Views) | |
| MikeZPU | Dec 15 2010, 01:00 AM Post #376 |
|
Many thanks to chatham and ~J~ for reporting with such great detail. It sounds like Mangum's defense attorney is NOT scoring many points with the jury, quite the opposite. I appreciate that the judge wants a drug expert to testify about drug interactions and side effects, if that is part of Mangum's defense BUT I would hope that the Judge would not simply let Mangum testify as to what drugs she was taking, but also require some kind of verification from both the physicians who wrote the prescriptions and the pharmacists who filled the prescriptions. (not that Mangum would ever make up stuff ... ) Re: the "minor injuries" that Lt. Bond noted with respect to Mangum's face and eye, those could easily have been caused while she was violently resisting arrest. And, again, we come back to the obvious: if Milton set the fire to his own clothes, smashed his own car with the vacuum cleaner, slashed his own tires, was punching Mangum in the face repeatedly in front of the children, why in God's name would Mangum repeatedly tell the cops to leave? Edited by MikeZPU, Dec 15 2010, 01:26 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| sdsgo | Dec 15 2010, 03:42 AM Post #377 |
|
Just how much damage to the building does NC require to support a conviction for arson? In re J.L.B.M. 176 N.C. App. 613 (2006) There was sufficient evidence to support a charge of burning a public building where a juvenile set off fireworks in an interview room at a police station. The willful and wanton element of the offense is supported by the juvenile's laughter while an officer tried to put out the fireworks, and the “setting fire” element is supported by the fireworks causing a flame two to three feet high which caused black markings on the floor and wall. Given the proximity of the fireworks to the wall and the resulting flame and damage, an intent to “set fire” can be inferred. N.C.G.S. § 14-59. State v. Norris, 172 N.C. App. 722 (2005) [Rev’d 360 NC (June 30, 2006) other issues] (1) The trial court did not err by denying defendant's motion to dismiss the charge of first- degree arson, because: 1) the residence in the instant case was described as a double-wide mobile home with a vinyl exterior, and the melting of vinyl constitutes a change in the identity of the material beyond a mere scorching or discoloration by heat; 2) evidence tending to show that the vinyl on the exterior of a residence is melted substantiates the charring element of arson; and 3) the owner of the residence testified that she could see flames out her window and an investigator noted damage to the residence including smoke damage and charring. (2) The trial court did not err in a first-degree arson case by denying defendant's request for a jury instruction on attempted arson, because: 1) there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could find that there was an actual burning of the residence; and 2) there was no evidence presented at trial from which the jury could find an attempt to burn the house which failed. State v. Bennett, 132 N.C. App. 187 (1999) The State's evidence was insufficient to support defendant's conviction of maliciously damaging occupied property by an incendiary device in violation of N.C.G.S. § 14-49.1 because it failed to show measurable damage where it tended to show that defendant ignited his blue jeans outside his jail cell and that the fire left a burned spot which was only slightly visible after it was stripped and waxed. However, by finding defendant guilty of the charged offense, the jury necessarily found that defendant committed all of the elements of the lesser offense of an attempt to maliciously damage occupied property by an incendiary device, and the case is remanded for entry of judgment for the lesser offense. More interesting examples at http://www.ncdistrictattorney.org/caselawbank/Arson%20-%20final.pdf |
![]() |
|
| ~J~ is in Wonderland | Dec 15 2010, 06:25 AM Post #378 |
|
~J~ is in Wonderland
|
http://www.heraldsun.com/view/full_story_news_durham/10670048/article-Judge-allows-disputed-Mangum-interview?instance=main_article During an interview with a police investigator, Crystal Mangum admitted setting fire to her boyfriend's clothes as well as slashing all four tires on his car and smashing his windshield. Defense lawyer Mani Dexter didn't want jurors to hear that interview, which was on a DVD. But Superior Court Judge Abraham Jones on Tuesday denied Dexter's motion to suppress testimony from Leslie Bond, a domestic-violence investigator with the Durham Police Department. Dexter said the information should have been kept from jurors because Bond obtained it by coercing Mangum, who wasn't in her right mind because she was taking medicine for a health condition. Mangum is charged with first-degree arson, three counts of contributing to the delinquency of juveniles, injury to personal property and resisting a public officer. The defendant's supporters, a constant presence at her trial, say she is being harassed by the powers that be in Durham on account of her 2006 rape accusation of three Duke University lacrosse players. The players eventually were cleared of wrongdoing. On the DVD, Mangum agreed to answer questions without a lawyer being present. So Bond began probing, and Mangum started talking: Mangum said Milton Walker -- at the time, her boyfriend -- got mad during the wee hours one day in February because ever since he moved in with her in January he'd been paying all of the bills, and the home was messy in part because her three kids weren't picking up after themselves. Mangum said she hadn't been feeling well during that time. Walker had taken her to the hospital, where she received a spinal tap, Mangum said. She said that left her tired, and she stayed in bed all day leading to the episode in which things got out of hand. Around midnight that day in February, Mangum said she responded to Walker's complaints by telling him he could leave the relationship, because she could make it without him. So Walker started packing his belongings, Mangum said. And then Mangum said she started telling him he was lousy in bed and commented on the small size of his private parts. Mangum said she tried to take a picture of Walker's private parts and told him she was going to show it to everybody. That's when Walker went off, Mangum said. He grabbed her around the neck and started punching her, Mangum said. Mangum said she scratched Walker. Two of Mangum's kids tried to pull the man off of her, while her crying 3-year-old observed the commotion, the defendant said. Mangum said she went outside and saw Walker's car window smashed and a vacuum cleaner nearby. Walker was out there, too, Mangum said. "He was running around screaming, "I loved you! I loved you!" Mangum said. She said Walker damaged his own car. "He's schizophrenic. He does crazy stuff." Then the cops showed up and arrested Mangum. "They just threw me down to the ground. They didn't ask me any questions or anything," Mangum said. The domestic-violence investigator tried to appeal woman-to-woman with Mangum. "I'm a female. You're a female," Bond said. Bond wasn't buying at least some parts of Mangum's story and told her she could understand if Mangum burned Walker's clothes in the bathtub and damaged his car in order to retaliate on him. "Are you trying to get me to say I did it?" Mangum asked Bond. Mangum inquired whether she could help her cause by admitting to having committed the crimes. So after first saying she saw Walker set the fire, Mangum reversed course and said she was responsible for it, as well as the damage to the car of the man she said she's known since she was 17. During her appeal to Mangum, Bond told her it's one thing to retaliate by trying to damage someone's property, but quite another thing to retaliate by trying to kill a person |
![]() |
|
| jarms | Dec 15 2010, 08:10 AM Post #379 |
|
So we're back to the strangling thing again, huh? |
![]() |
|
| Mason | Dec 15 2010, 08:12 AM Post #380 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. This is what I was told from the very beginning - Milton was leaving. He was leaving and Crystal Freaked. Someone else has always cared for Crystal's kids - and this was quite a blow for someone that doesn't even have a license. . |
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Dec 15 2010, 08:52 AM Post #381 |
|
|
![]() |
|
| kbp | Dec 15 2010, 10:20 AM Post #382 |
|
Thanks for all the reporting.
|
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Dec 15 2010, 10:47 AM Post #383 |
|
Maybe today or tomorrow there can be something introduced to show that Milton, and this is true, carries a diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia. Immediately after this whole incident Mr. Walker spent about two month on the Psych ward at the Durham Veteran's Administration Hospital across from Duke North. So the victim's mental health is being attacked? I wonder if the Judge will allow this? On a sad note if that is true what a environment she has provided for those children. Revolving "boyfriends" a & mother of dubious mental health who have apparently spent time in hospitalization for mental illness. |
![]() |
|
| nyesq83 | Dec 15 2010, 12:13 PM Post #384 |
|
Interesting - Crystal's mental health is not relevant and is 'off-limits' according to her supporters, but Matherly has no trouble publishing Crystal's boyfriend's confidential medical condition to the world. I still stand by my assertion that Crystal blames and projects her insanity onto the behavior of others.
Edited by nyesq83, Dec 15 2010, 12:15 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| nyesq83 | Dec 15 2010, 12:14 PM Post #385 |
|
By the way, thanks to all those whoe have reported! Excellent work. Notice how the Hurled Scum quotes Crystal's lies and gives them great weight versus reality... |
![]() |
|
| jarms | Dec 15 2010, 12:14 PM Post #386 |
|
It's all her sister's fault. Remember whose name she gave to the cops! |
![]() |
|
| nyesq83 | Dec 15 2010, 12:30 PM Post #387 |
|
By the way, it's not paranoia - CGM is out to get you, Milton! |
![]() |
|
| ~J~ is in Wonderland | Dec 15 2010, 01:08 PM Post #388 |
|
~J~ is in Wonderland
|
Both sides have rested. Closing arguments start at 2:00. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 15 2010, 01:09 PM Post #389 |
|
Deleted User
|
1. I don't know if Milton is actually schizo, but anybody who would live with CGM has got to be a littlle crazy. 2. Is anybody, sane, taking care of the kids? What will it take for the social services to step up and protect these poor kids? 3. THe spinal tap story does not make sense to me. Hospitals do not just up and do those taps without trying less invasive procedures first. Usually, if a tap is done, the patient is required to maintain bed rest, in a prone position, for several hours to permit the body to regenerate the fluid. Otherwise a "spinal headache" can ensue and it can be BAD. I'm just wondering if anybody actually verified if a tap was done, and what were the presenting symptoms. It is usually done if suspected meningitis, tumor, or whatever. Not just for a casual headach. |
|
|
| ~J~ is in Wonderland | Dec 15 2010, 01:10 PM Post #390 |
|
~J~ is in Wonderland
|
So if anyone wishes to go, now's the time. There may be a verdict this afternoon. I have been stuck here all day waiting for repairman to fix my heat. Its 58 degrees inside. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic » |







3:32 AM Jul 11