| Questions for the DPD; Miranda rights? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 1 2010, 09:31 PM (207 Views) | |
| Quasimodo | Nov 1 2010, 09:31 PM Post #1 |
|
http://johninnorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2006/07/duke-lacrosse-police-investigation_16.html Am I off base to think that matters of when, how and whether the Duke lacrosse captains were read their Miranda rights are relevant? Also, I was under the impression that a reading of Miranda rights would apply to the 43 other Duke students required to submit to DNA testing and strip naked to the waist for Durham police photos. But I can’t find any mention in the media of Miranda happening to the 43. Am I right or wrong about Miranda and the Duke captains? Or is that question best left to attorneys? What about the 43? 1) WHY did it take so long to get a search warrant ( reality is, the accuser statement alone combined with the VISUAL finding of diffuse edema is MORE THAN ENOUGH to get a search warrant) The normal process is to send a unit to secure the scene- CALL a judge( wake him up if needed) get a VERBAL and start searching ( I have done this in LESS than 30 minutes) 2)WHY was Kim ( who was NAMED as an assailant) NOT arrested? [Great question for the Raleigh News & Observer. ] 3) why were the SUSPECTS not arrested or FORMALLY questioned ( as to alibis etc) If the police, DA Nifong and Nifong’s friend and mentor, Judge Ron Stephens, ascribed any real credibility to the accusers allegations, why were the students allowed to walk free among us for weeks? 4)WHY was a sketch artist NOT called ( she gave names and descriptions) and those SKETCHES distributed and a HUMAN line up NOT conducted ( DPD CANNOT say they didnt know who the players were and none of them seem to match HER descriptions) 5)WHY does the DPD have HER computer? ( since she didnt know Kim or ever had meetings with the Duke people- I see it as IMPOSSIBLE she would have information about them PLUS even if she DID- she is the AV- NOT a SUSPECT- why do they have it?) 6)WHY was this "mystery" fourth person just "ignored" ( from the line up) 7) WHY so MANY line ups? 8) WHY didnt the DPD get a FULL list of attendees of the party and FORMALLY question them? 9) WHY does Nifong want the personal information of UNINDICTED players? 10 WHAT was the cabbie arrested for ( was he charged in that other incident? was it a bench warrant? ) and WHY were INVESTIGATORS doing the arresting ( thats normally a DEPUTY'S job) This is really a very simple case ( the AV is known, the suspects are, witnesses are, all forensic evidence has been collected etc) yet the DPD has violated almost every generally accepted procedure used in every jurisdiction in the US |
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Nov 1 2010, 09:37 PM Post #2 |
|
What were they "protecting"? What was Judge Stephens "protecting" on the cell phone? (And why wasn't anyone in the media interested in this? Who were the other names (if any) on the computer/cell phone; and what was their reaction during the Frame? Does that explain their reactions? If they were subject to possible blackmail--implied or otherwise--about the case, then doesn't that call for an investigation by an outside authority? Edited by Quasimodo, Nov 1 2010, 09:45 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Nov 1 2010, 09:41 PM Post #3 |
|
Two answers in Poster Comments about Miranda rights:
The second Poster Comment:
|
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Nov 1 2010, 09:42 PM Post #4 |
|
Another relevant Poster Comment:
Again, didn't anyone in the media think of this? |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic » |






9:14 AM Jul 11