| Why not the bedrooms? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 28 2010, 11:47 PM (264 Views) | |
| Quasimodo | Oct 28 2010, 11:47 PM Post #1 |
|
John in Carolina raised a pertinent point: If you are going to rape someone, and have the cooperation or acquiescence of your entire team, why head for a tiny bathroom?
Apparently all of the players were supposed to have known that a 30 minute struggle and rape was taking place in the bathroom. Apparently at least three other players helped separate the two dancers. If that was so, why was the tiny bathroom selected as the locale for the rape? Surely instead any of the bedrooms would have served better? No one would have interrupted them. And perhaps others would have wanted to join in? Considered logically, the entire bathroom story would seem to fall apart. |
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Oct 28 2010, 11:50 PM Post #2 |
|
POSTER COMMENTS at site:
. (Neither did the second dancer notice anything wrong for half an hour--despite being forcibly separated from the other dancer? Nor did she think to use her cell phone to call for help? Or run to a neighbor? Or run across the street to Duke?) . |
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Oct 28 2010, 11:53 PM Post #3 |
|
Of course, we'll never get to see that bathroom now. The skeptical among Durham residents could have tried to fit four persons inside, to see for themselves. However, Duke--which had a duty to do all it could to help restore the reputations of the falsely accused (which reputations were in no small way damaged by the innuendo spread by Duke's own employees)--chose instead to destroy the evidence and make sure it could never be seen. And that, in itself, IMHO, could be cause for another suit. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic » |







9:14 AM Jul 11