| The Jewell story vs. Duke lacrosse | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 28 2010, 09:37 PM (288 Views) | |
| Quasimodo | Oct 28 2010, 09:37 PM Post #1 |
|
|
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Oct 28 2010, 09:38 PM Post #2 |
|
|
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Oct 28 2010, 09:39 PM Post #3 |
|
Thirty seconds, ONCE, pointing to Jewell as likely guilty. Compare that with the serial accusers Nancy Grace, Wendy Murphy; with Geraldo; with all the news coverage this received. Compare it to "Dancer gives details of ordeal"--a story which not only contained false information, but which omitted other information which might have brought the accuser's story into question. Considering ONE media outlet had to pay at least $500,000 for ONE thirty-second broadcast impugning the reputation of an innocent defendant... And how liable should someone be if they deliberately disseminated false information, manipulated statistics and gave innuendo to the media, in order to further incriminate persons they knew to be innocent for a crime which never happened? Multiply that by the number of persons involved (to include family). Multiply that by the number of incidents. Multiply that by the number of days it took to bring them to that admission. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() Our users say it best: "Zetaboards is the best forum service I have ever used." |
|
| « Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic » |







9:14 AM Jul 11