| Victim of Durham Police Lineup?; DPD refuses to share evidence! | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jun 18 2008, 03:26 AM (249 Views) | |
| Deleted User | Jun 18 2008, 03:26 AM Post #1 |
|
Deleted User
|
. Look who the "victim" was. Read the Duke Lacrosse docs and you'll know in 15 minutes that this wasn't the first time they had employed these tactics and their own brand of "Justice" Anne Blythe, Staff Writer DURHAM - A 21-year-old man who has spent nearly a third of his life behind bars for an armed robbery he insists he had nothing to do with is looking toward a South Carolina inmate to help free him. Judge Orlando Hudson issued an order this month that gives Erick Daniels and his lawyers permission to interview Samuel Allen Strong at the federal prison in Salters, S.C. Daniels was 15 in December 2001 when he was convicted of burglary and using a dangerous weapon to rob a Durham Police Department employee. When the verdict came in, Daniels tried to jump a barricade and run for the door. Since then he has battled for freedom. His attempts with the N.C. Court of Appeals were unsuccessful and fraught with delays. Carlos Mahoney, a Durham civil rights lawyer, picked up the case several years ago and has been advocating for Daniels since. After reviewing the trial evidence, Mahoney is convinced that Daniels had ineffective counsel. Mahoney has filed a motion for a new trial, contending that new evidence has surfaced and that prosecutors withheld information that could have helped Daniels. The case hinged on identification of Daniels by a key witness in a photo-lineup procedure that, according to court documents, was as flawed as the notorious one in the Duke lacrosse case. The witness, according to court documents, identified Daniels from a middle school yearbook photo after 30 minutes of study. The state, according to court documents, offered no physical evidence or corroborating testimony linking Daniels to the robbery. Ruth Brown, the witness, told police that two armed men with bandannas burst into her home on Sept. 21, 2000, and stole her pocketbook with $6,232 in cash. Mahoney contends that Daniels' trial lawyer should have challenged the identification procedure. He also contends that Daniels' trial attorneys should have investigated Strong who, according to court documents, matched the description of one suspect and was in photos with the second suspect. Mahoney has asked a judge to force the Durham police to turn over fingerprints and palm prints for Strong so they can be compared with evidence recovered at the robbery scene. Durham police refused in October 2006 to supply Mahoney with the evidence. "They refused even though it's public record," Mahoney said recently. Daniels, who was sentenced to 10 to 14 years, is scheduled to go before a judge again in September. By then he would have served more than half the sentence he received, but Mahoney hopes to persuade a judge to give the Durham man a new chance at freedom. anne.blythe@newobserver.com or (919) 932-8741 http://www.newsobserver.com/news/durham/durham/story/1111959.html |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 18 2008, 03:30 AM Post #2 |
|
Deleted User
|
. Why would this Durham Police employee or witness have over $6,000 in Cash in her pocketbook? ? . |
|
|
| darby | Jun 18 2008, 06:31 AM Post #3 |
|
Tony, if I recall from when we studied this case before Brown is in charge of and gets paid to conduct the annual police auction. I'm going from memory here but her "expenses" routinely exceded the proceeds. This is another one of those "only in Durham" thingys. |
![]() |
|
| darby | Jun 18 2008, 07:06 AM Post #4 |
|
|
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Jun 18 2008, 07:35 AM Post #5 |
|
MAY 23, 2007 Durham justice BY RICHARD HART "This entire experience has opened my eyes up to a tragic world of injustice I never knew existed. If police officers and a district attorney can systematically railroad us with absolutely no evidence whatsoever, I can't imagine what they'd do to people who do not have the resources to defend themselves." —Reade Seligmann, former Duke lacrosse player, after sexual assault and kidnapping charges against him were dropped Reade Seligmann, meet Erick Daniels. He's what happens to people without money when they're railroaded by Durham police and the Durham district attorney's office. Daniels was a 14-year-old Chewning Middle School student when two armed men wearing bandanas broke into the home of Ruth Brown and stole thousands of dollars she said was in her purse. There was no physical evidence linking Daniels (or anyone else) to the crime, and Brown identified Daniels as one of her assailants after picking his picture out of a Chewning yearbook. She said she recognized his eyebrows. That's it. That's all the "evidence" there was connecting Erick Daniels to the robbery. As a result, a 15-year-old boy was sentenced to 10 years in prison. But the miscarriage of justice goes much deeper than that. As Mosi Secret found in a six-month investigation, problems with Daniels' case abound. The flaws and failures bear striking similarities to the ones that made the Duke lacrosse case—and Durham—symbols of a justice system run amok. They include: An unreliable victim/witness: An investigation by one of Daniels' appeals lawyers found that Brown—a Durham police department employee—was actually running an illegal poker game at the time of the robbery. Suspect didn't match the victim's description: Brown originally said her assailant was light-skinned with braids. Daniels is dark-skinned and has hair too short to braid. (snip) http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A154410 |
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Jun 18 2008, 07:39 AM Post #6 |
|
http://www.nabj.org/front/story/856p-1358c.html The Triangle Association of Black Journalists, a NABJ affliate chapter, released the following statement on Nov. 15, 2004. Like those who ready for war, we know that we could face persecution in executing our jobs as journalists. This weekend, Demorris Lee did. He was arrested and spent two hours in police custody for doing his job as a reporter. Three years ago, a woman named Ruth Brown accused a 14-year-old Durham teen of robbing her of $6,000 cash. At the time, Lee covered the Durham County courts and began to follow the story for The News & Observer. Knowing the details, he quickly questioned whether the teen, Erick Daniels, had been wrongly convicted. Last month, Lee contacted Brown hoping to get her response to the N.C. Center on Actual Innocence taking on Erick Daniels' case. At the time, Lee was writing another story that included his prison interview with the teen. In the story, Lee was seeking Brown's comment about Daniels maintaining his innocence, the center intervening on the teenís behalf and about whether she was sure about her identification of Daniels as the robber. Lee said he left two voice messages on Oct. 17 for Brown, and may also have contacted a relative when he reached a woman who told him that he had the wrong number for a Ruth Brown. Three weeks ago, Brown filed a complaint with the Durham County magistrate's office alleging that Lee was harassing her with phone calls. A warrant for Lee's arrest was executed based on the complaint's allegations. At about 8 a.m. Sunday, Raleigh police arrived at Lee's Raleigh home. He was frisked, handcuffed, placed in the back seat of the police cruiser and driven to the Wake County jail in downtown Raleigh. While in custody, Lee's belt, shoelaces and other items were temporarily confiscated. He was fingerprinted and later released on his own recognizance. News & Observer Executive Editor Melanie Sill, Assistant Managing Editor Dan Barkin and the newspaper's attorney all went to the jail to expedite Lee's release. "I didn't do anything wrong," Lee said. "I was trying to be fair and give her the opportunity to respond to a story that her name was going to be in. I'm disappointed she felt she had to do this instead of just saying 'No comment.'" (snip) Particularly upsetting is that the criminal justice system has been used against a journalist's First Amendment right in his quest to free a teenager who may have been wrongly convicted. We condemn the actions of the Durham County magistrate's office and all others involved in this injustice. We firmly believe that the charges will be dropped and that this arrest will be expunged from Lee's record. (snip) |
![]() |
|
| Truth Detector | Jun 18 2008, 07:47 AM Post #7 |
|
Is Brown still employed by the DPD? |
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Jun 18 2008, 07:49 AM Post #8 |
|
http://209.85.141.104/search?q=cache:vOrT1Puxk_AJ:www.durhampolice.com/news/pdf/080326_1.pdf+ruth+brown+durham+police&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl=us&client=firefox-a CITY OF DURHAM Office of Public Affairs 101 CITY HALL PLAZA DURHAM, NC 27701 News Release For Details, Contact: Kammie Michael Public Information Officer (919) 560-4322 x259 Kammie.Michael@durhamnc.gov Durham Police Department For Immediate Release: March 26, 2008 Durham Police Chief Announces Promotions Durham Police Chief Jose L. Lopez Sr. has promoted 24 employees, including a new deputy chief which is the department’s second highest rank. A promotion ceremony will be held on Friday, March 28. “I am very proud of this organization as we move forward. These officers and civilian employees are very deserving of their promotions and they will help lead the Police Department into the future,” Lopez said. Major B.J. Council has been promoted to the position of deputy chief. Council, a 27-year veteran of the department, will oversee Operations Command, which includes the North Operations Bureau, the South Operations Bureau and the Investigations Bureau. Council has served in the Patrol, Criminal Investigations, and Special Investigations divisions. She has also worked as a crime prevention officer and served as captain of District 4 for 3½ years. She is currently the major in charge of the Patrol Bureau. (snip) Other promotions include: (snip) Corporal – B.G. Bishop, H. Bennett, R.D. Clayton, R.D. Fountain IV, K.L. Johnson and B.D. Schnee (snip) Senior Evidence Technician – Ruth Brown (snip) |
![]() |
|
| Truth Detector | Jun 18 2008, 07:53 AM Post #9 |
|
So Brown is running a gambling operation and has the title at DPD of Senior Evidence Tech.? Only in Wonderland |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic » |






9:58 AM Dec 5