Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Crystal's statements to the AG; a useful refresher
Topic Started: Mar 6 2010, 02:54 PM (377 Views)
Quasimodo

(from the AG's report) :

During the March 29, 2007 interview of the accusing witness by the special prosecutors and SBI investigators she made several new statements that she had never made before including:

She was not with “Nikki” when the 911 call regarding the racial comments outside 610 N. Buchanan Blvd. was made;

She and “Nikki” left 610 N. Buchanan Blvd. in “Nikki’s” car at 11:50 p.m.;

She and “Nikki” rode around for an hour after leaving the house;

Evans and Seligmann threw her onto the back porch after the alleged assault;

Evans, Seligmann and Finnerty kicked her in the neck while she was on the back porch after the alleged assault;

Ten party attendees assaulted her in the back yard by pushing her around;

Evans and Finnerty put her in “Nikki’s” car.

(snip)

For example, the accusing witness admitted she feigned unconsciousness during the early morning hours of March 14, 2006. She claimed she arrived at the party at 11:10 p.m. and dancing started shortly thereafter. When shown credible photographic evidence to the contrary, she claimed that the pictures had been altered. She stated that they danced in a bedroom not the living room.

When confronted with credible photographic evidence to the contrary, she claimed Duke paid someone to alter the photos. She routinely denied she made various earlier statements that were attributed to her by law enforcement officials. She denied that she had made statements attributed to her in medical reports both the night of the alleged attack and in the ensuing days.

The accusing witness claimed that the photograph of her on the back porch at 610 N. Buchanan Blvd., time-stamped at 12:30 a.m. and in which she is smiling broadly, is a picture of her arriving at the party. When the special prosecutors pointed out that she was wearing only one shoe, she persisted in her position that the picture was taken when she arrived at the house.

[btw, every news organization which had that photo and blotted out her face to protect her identity, also knew that she was smiling in that photo; and that blotting out her entire face--including the broad smile--presented an entirely different
image of her state of mind--and thereby to that extent cooperated in the attempted frame, IMHO.]


In the same interview, the credibility of the accusing witness’s ability to identify the alleged attackers
was further called into doubt. When asked how she could recall with such certainty who allegedly attacked her she claimed she was good at remembering faces. When the special prosecutors brought Officer Gwen Sutton of the Durham Police Department into the interview room, the accusing witness claimed she did not know Officer Sutton and had not seen her before that day. Officer Sutton had spent more than five hours with the accusing witness during the early morning hours of March 14, 2006.

Similarly, when the special prosecutors asked her about her behavior during the party that suggested
impairment, the accusing witness stated that she was dizzy and fuzzy when the two women
began dancing that night. She said she was dizzy after the alleged assault, and that was why she was stumbling in the backyard. When asked how she could be certain of her identifications of her attackers, she said she was dizzy when the dancing started, she “woke up” in the bathroom, and then was dizzy afterward.

In a meeting with the special prosecutors on April 4, 2007 the accusing witness demonstrated unsteady gait, slurred speech and other mannerisms that were consistent with behaviors observed by numerous witnesses who were at the party the night in question and confirmed through a video taken that night. The special prosecutors confirmed that the accusing witness had taken Ambien, methadone, Paxil and amitriptyline, for which she had prescriptions, prior to meeting with the special prosecutors that day.
Edited by Quasimodo, Mar 6 2010, 02:57 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Quasimodo

(snip)

The accusing witness also made contradictory and inconsistent statements about whether an attack took place at all. Sometime around 1:30 a.m. on March 14, 2006, the accusing witness did not disclose that any sexual assault occurred to the first law enforcement officer she encountered that night, Sgt. J.C. Shelton.

She was then taken to the Durham Center Access, where in response to a question by a nurse about whether she had been raped, she responded “yes.”

The accusing witness was then taken to the emergency room, where she told Shelton that she was “pulled from the car at 610 N. Buchanan and groped” but “no one forced” her to have sex.

The accusing witness next told Officer Gwen Sutton at the hospital that she was penetrated by five guys.

Similarly, the accusing witness’s statements about the duration of the alleged assault have been contradictory and could not be reconciled with verifiable credible evidence.

On March 16, 2006 the accusing witness claimed that the alleged assault lasted 30 minutes.

On December 21, 2006, she claimed that the alleged assault lasted 10-15 minutes ending at midnight.

On March 29, 2007 she stated to the special prosecutors that the alleged assault lasted 20-30 minutes.

Testimonial evidence supported by a receipt shows the accusing witness arriving at 610 N. Buchanan
Blvd. approximately 11:40 p.m. March 13, 2006. Time-stamped photographic evidence disclosed that the accusing witness was performing at 610 N. Buchanan Blvd. beginning no later than midnight and ended the performance at approximately 12:04 a.m.

Cell phone records which were verified by the special prosecutors and the SBI show that the accusing witness’s cell phone was used at 12:26 a.m. to call an escort service with whom the accusing witness was associated.

Time-stamped photographs and videos show the accusing witness outside the house beginning no later than 12:30 a.m. and outside the house until she was put in “Nikki’s”’ car at 12:42 a.m.

Before midnight, all witnesses interviewed who had knowledge, including the accusing witness, stated that the accusing witness was with “Nikki” in a bathroom getting ready for the performance.

After the performance ended at 12:04 a.m., all witnesses with knowledge stated that the dancers went back to the bathroom together and were alone for some time, left the house together and remained outside together for some time, came back to the house for some time and went back into the bathroom alone together for some time. It was evident to the special prosecutors
that there was no opportunity for an attack to occur for even 10 minutes, much less the 20 or 30 minutes as alleged.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kerri P.
Member Avatar

I wonder if the special prosecutors told her that she was holding Dave Evans shaving kit bag while she was standing on the back porch with that sh@t eating grin on her face? That picture shows her going through the bag.
Edited by Kerri P., Mar 6 2010, 03:00 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Quasimodo

Kerri P.
Mar 6 2010, 02:59 PM
I wonder if the special prosecutors told her that she was holding Dave Evans shaving kit bag while she was standing on the back porch with that sh@t eating grin on her face? That picture shows her going through the bag.
If she took the bag, wasn't that petty theft?

Why did she take the bag? Was she confused? Or did she want proof she had been inside the house? (Remember that the woman who accused William Kennedy Smith of rape took something from inside his house to prove she had been inside. )

Edited by Quasimodo, Mar 6 2010, 03:07 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
MikeZPU

:sarc2:

I am not sure if many people truly appreciate what a diabolical plan
these LAX players had conceived and executed to a tee.

Think of the best mastermind criminal that you have seen in any motion
picture, and these boys were orders of magnitude better than that.

They hand-picked Mangum to gang-rape, under the guise of hiring her as a
stripper, BECAUSE they knew that she would not be believed by the police
BECAUSE she had stolen a cab a few years earlier, had taken it for a joy ride,
and nearly hit a cop before crashing the cab into a police cruiser.

In addition, the boys knew that Mangum did private performances and was
most likely a prostitute. That she had sex with anyone and everyone,
including her drivers. They even knew all about her prescription drugs
that she dangerously mixed together with alcohol.

The boys knew they could get away with gang raping Mangum because the cops
would never believe such a person.

BUT, little did they know, that cape crusader Mike Nifong would have the
strength and courage to believe her story, despite Mangum almost being a cop
killer, despite the fact that she does private performances with a vibrator,
that she sleeps with anyone and everyone and is most likely a prostitute.

BUT wait, the boys were even more diabolical and cunning than Mike Nifong
ever anticipated. As a back-up, after they gang-raped Mangum both vaginally and anally,
and even orally, they made use of some of the most sophisticated forensics
techniques that are light years ahead of their time, to not only remove any trace
of semen -- no they went even further and removed every last LAX DNA cell.
They didn't leave a single cell of LAX DNA on any item in the rape kit!

But wait, that's just half of it: they were able to do all of that and YET leave
intact the pre-existing DNA on Mangum from multiple non-LAX males.

Forensic experts from around the globe have been secretly awaiting the opportunity
to talk to these boys and learn their techniques that are light years ahead of their time.

What these LAX players accomplished was truly unparalleled in the annals of
forensic science.

Edited by MikeZPU, Mar 8 2010, 10:19 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
nyesq83
Member Avatar

"Unparalleled in the annals of forensic science" with regard to CGM...indeed
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bill Anderson
Member Avatar

MikeZPU
Mar 8 2010, 01:06 AM
:sarc2:

I am not sure if many people truly appreciate what a diabolical plan
these LAX players had conceived and executed to a tee.

Think of the best mastermind criminal that you have seen in any motion
picture, and these boys were orders of magnitude better than that.

They hand-picked Mangum to gang-rape, under the guise of hiring her as a
stripper, BECAUSE they knew that she would not be believed by the police
BECAUSE she had stolen a cab a few years earlier, had taken it for a joy ride,
and nearly hit a cop before crashing the cab into a police cruiser.

In addition, the boys knew that Mangum did private performances and was
most likely a prostitute. That she had sex with anyone and everyone,
including her drivers. They even knew all about her prescription drugs
that she dangerously mixed together with alcohol.

The boys knew they could get away with gang raping Mangum because the cops
would never believe such a person.

BUT, little did they know, that cape crusader Mike Nifong would have the
strength and courage to believe her story, despite Mangum almost being a cop
killer, despite the fact that she does private performances with a vibrator,
that she sleeps with anyone and everyone and is most likely a prostitute.

BUT wait, the boys were even more diabolical and cunning than Mike Nifong
ever anticipated. As a back-up, after they gang-raped Mangum both vaginally and anally,
and even orally, they made use of some of the most sophisticated forensics
techniques that are light years ahead of their time, to not only remove any trace
of semen -- no they went even further and removed every last LAX DNA cell.
They didn't leave a single cell of LAX DNA on any item in the rape kit!

But wait, that's just half of it: they were able to do all of that and YET leave
intact the pre-existing DNA on Mangum from multiple non-LAX males.

Forensic experts from around the globe have been secretly awaiting the opportunity
to talk to these boys and learn their techniques that are light years ahead of their time.

What these LAX players accomplished was truly unparalleled in the annals of
forensic science.

Uh, oh! You had better be careful or else Sidney is going to plagiarize your post and put it on his blog. After all, everything in this post was EXACTLY the story Sidney is telling us.

Yeah, diabolical carpetbaggers. Lets hear it for Durm!!

:bill:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community.
Learn More · Register for Free
« Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic »
Add Reply