| Some questions for the BOT | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 3 2010, 02:45 PM (202 Views) | |
| Quasimodo | Mar 3 2010, 02:45 PM Post #1 |
|
As a service to the media, here are some questions which might be presented to the Trustees in any theoretical press conference. (Members of the Board of Trustees should feel free to answer these here, should they feel so inclinced.) 1 ) Was any Duke money frozen in the Wachovia account which serviced more than 1000 colleges and schools? 2 ) Was any Duke money lost in the fall of Wachovia? 3 ) Would CEO Steel and BOT chairman Steel have a conflict of interest over investing Duke money in Wachovia? 4 ) Was any such Duke money ever so invested? 5 ) Does Duke intend to protest that its students are targeted by the DPD, to the extent that their rate of receiving citations for alcohol violations is more than THIRTY TIMES that of NCCU? 6 ) Does Duke intend to demand answers from the city and the DPD as to how and why three innocent Duke students, falsely accused of rape, yet proven innocent even before they were indicted, still had to endure a year of a false prosecution by the city? 7 ) Does Duke have a policy regarding defending its students if they are being targeted by the local community? What is the policy; and why and how was it applied/not applied in the above instances? 8 ) How much money has Duke spent in defending itself thus far against the four suits arising from the mishandling of the Duke lacrosse false prosecution? 9 ) Does the BOT have any statement to make about the false rape prosecution, now that the case is over and such a statement cannot be regarded as interfering in the judicial process? Any statement to the falsely accused and their families? Any statement to the student body? Any statement to the faculty? Any statement to the community? Any statement to the Almuni? 10 ) What measures has the BOT endorsed which would help prevent false prosecutions of its students in the future? Surely they can't have anything to say at all? |
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Mar 3 2010, 02:50 PM Post #2 |
|
a few more... Why hasn't Duke investigated the professors who instigated the campus community against the Duke Lacrosse Team? Were any of the Duke professors behind the protests against the lacrosse Team? Doesn't that violate University policy? Did Duke professors have any part in the Vigilante Poster? Were University resources used in the protests and listening ads? Did Duke professors harass and attack the Lacrosse team in their classes? Why didn't DUMC officials come forward and correct the impression that the SANE Exam showed injuries? When in fact it didn't! Did Duke force DUMC employees to stay silent when they knew in fact Crystal was bipolar, faking injuries, and the Duke PD knew it also? Were Duke PD officers forced to alter reports? Did DUMC officials discover that Levicy altered the SANE, knew it was incomplete, was performed by Manly, and yet said NOTHING? |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic » |







7:14 PM Jul 10