Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Who needs a Senate or a Congress ?
Topic Started: Feb 12 2010, 07:37 PM (574 Views)
Deleted User
Deleted User

Thank you "comelately". I guess we all sound like broken records periodically. BUt I need to keep perspective on things. Am I mad about BHO and his idiot Czars? To quote Palin "You BETCHA". But am I going to predict the decline and fall of the United States of America? No.

I am of the opinion that BHO's intention is to create a marxist government in the US and discard the US Constitution. I am also of the opinion that there are enough people who have enough sense, strength of purpose and will to prevent that. Including the US Military.

Quote Post Goto Top
 
retiredLEO
Member Avatar

dsl
Feb 13 2010, 01:32 PM
Thank you "comelately". I guess we all sound like broken records periodically. BUt I need to keep perspective on things. Am I mad about BHO and his idiot Czars? To quote Palin "You BETCHA". But am I going to predict the decline and fall of the United States of America? No.

I am of the opinion that BHO's intention is to create a marxist government in the US and discard the US Constitution. I am also of the opinion that there are enough people who have enough sense, strength of purpose and will to prevent that. Including the US Military.

Well someone need to wake up Harry and Nancy, do I trust this congess? NO, they won't do anything, I think they are sitting around waiting for BHO, to sign the executive orders. My biggest problem, if they turn out to be illegal, it could take years, to overturn them. It just seems to me like all these people want is POWER, most are not in it for country.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
comelately

dsl
Feb 13 2010, 01:32 PM
Thank you "comelately". I guess we all sound like broken records periodically. BUt I need to keep perspective on things. Am I mad about BHO and his idiot Czars? To quote Palin "You BETCHA". But am I going to predict the decline and fall of the United States of America? No.

I am of the opinion that BHO's intention is to create a marxist government in the US and discard the US Constitution. I am also of the opinion that there are enough people who have enough sense, strength of purpose and will to prevent that. Including the US Military.

You BETCHA.
Edited by comelately, Feb 13 2010, 02:23 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

:toast:
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Check out what is happening in Va. legislature where a recent bill has been proposed to PREVENT the mandating of purchase of health care with coersion. Battle is on 10th Ammendment Rights. YEAH. Fox reports 16 states currently are considering this move to block Feds from coercing citizens to buy ANYTHING. Say that contracts made under duress are illegal. IF it comes to the point that good honest citizens are put into jail because they REFUSE to bow the knee to Obama's dictatorship, we will end up with a citizen uprising. If not before.

Cheer up!!!!

We are sturdy and we are stubborn and we LIKE our freedoms. Reid and Pelosi look like they are about to keel over under the pressure. Can we hope?
Quote Post Goto Top
 
retiredLEO
Member Avatar

DSL and comelately, I agree with both of you about BHO, I am just not as optimistic. I think that optimism sometime leads to lethargy and you just sit back and wait and everything will work out in the end. I have never seen a president do what BHO is doing, firing the CEO of GM. He wants the EPA, to impose fines for too much carbon emissions, to circumvent cap and trade. I have also never seen a congress so willing to give up their power and surrender it to the executive branch.

I agree we may all be okay in the end, but when will it end. If BHO get his agenda passed, it will hurt a lot of people economicly. They were discussing this on FOX today about Obama's new "climate study agency", is anyone going to convince him that there is no global warming? He is already convinced it is happening right now. IMHO, this is just another way for him to redistribute wealth, he mentioned that before. He wanted the Supreme Court to reditibute wealth, he thinks the constitution is a charter of negative liberties, it says what the feds can't do to you, but doesn't say what the feds can do on your behalf. I really don't want them to do anything more then they already do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck

Compare Obama's answer to this one, just the first few minutes will do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5cEhtge_BE
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Baldo
Member Avatar

It is rumored Obama is about to create a Climate Change Agency with a Czar.

The reason for hope always belongs to us as individuals. We can control that.

However, there is a real reason to be concerned. Obama seems to be disavowing the reality we have.

I do agree pessimism can be a self expanding drain. So my solution is to go out and create some good news for yourself, because our government isn't creating for us.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

I do believe that there is some space between pessimism and optimism. I am not optimistic about things as they currently are. But I am HOPEFUL that leaders will emerge ON every level... local to very top.... who will take the helm before the whole boat capsizes.

I am not optimistic that it will be easy.

I am not pessimistic that catastrophy is inevitable.

I guess I would say "cautiously hopeful"?

We have voices arising everywhere. It may be costly to turn this around. But both our ancestors and our descendants deserve it.

Quote Post Goto Top
 
retiredLEO
Member Avatar

I am just leery of a president who, wants to run the country by executive order, instead of letting the fruit and nuts (house and senate) make laws.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
longstop
longstop
How long will it take both houses should they become Republican to shut down his attempts (Czars) to circumnavigate the Constitution?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp


The moves to use policies in how to regulate could be a blessing if Zero hopes to be re-elected.

Any move against deep pocket plants generating energy results in higher prices for consumers resulting from both the legal battle and increases in operating cost to meet the regulations. A total no-win for Zero.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
retiredLEO
Member Avatar

kbp
Feb 13 2010, 04:51 PM
The moves to use policies in how to regulate could be a blessing if Zero hopes to be re-elected.

Any move against deep pocket plants generating energy results in higher prices for consumers resulting from both the legal battle and increases in operating cost to meet the regulations. A total no-win for Zero.
Higher energy prices, will not only affect us in our homes, it will affect use as consumers of everything we buy clothing, food etc. So the 1700 dollars per average household for energy is a bogus number.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · LIESTOPPERS UNDERGROUND · Next Topic »
Add Reply