| Wade Smith and Jim Cooney; are Edwards lawyers.... | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 29 2010, 05:50 PM (5,223 Views) | |
| Joan Foster | Jan 30 2010, 09:23 AM Post #31 |
|
What I took away from the ABC interview was how ghoulish the whole deal was: let Elizabeth die a happy death. It won't be long. Then WE all live happily ever after. Young would then have his name cleared (what he and his wife wanted), Rielle would have Edwards, and we would have another Messianic Democrat to save us and the world in whatever high and mighty position. But Elizabeth was a bit tardy in the wrapping up her end of the situation. Honestly, it's that cold. Watching Edwards accept his Father of the Year award...and clips of him proclaiming "great love" for Elizabeth where placed in context of the timeline of the affair and pregnancy. Devastating. Edited by Joan Foster, Jan 30 2010, 09:25 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Mason | Jan 30 2010, 09:24 AM Post #32 |
|
Parts unknown
|
The N&O had a rep on the local radio saying there was no way they could've exposed or discovered this story. It was the same show/station as the guy that allowed the Duke case to be misrepresented on his show (more than once). The Radio host agreed there was nothing to be done. That is BS. So many people knew Reille Hunter was in Cary and then walking around prominently pregnant with no apparent source of income to be living large. No one wondered why Reille relocated to the Cary area. Hunter was waiting for someone to expose the story and probably exasperated by how hard it was for the story to be finally broken. Any pics of them together, even unusual pics would be explained away and a willing media would believe whatever story was offered up. IF she lost that baby, she would have no proof of a sexual affair. That is most likely why a tape of sex with a pregnant woman was made. . |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Jan 30 2010, 09:25 AM Post #33 |
|
Ya know, it is common for a Presidential candidate and his mistress to have a sex tape. Nothing to worry about. BTW I am open for a $700,000 gift because I'm a swell guy. |
![]() |
|
| Mason | Jan 30 2010, 09:30 AM Post #34 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. The real story that they never wanted uncovered (and the cause of the separation) is that John and Elizabeth Edwards treated people like sh*t and believed they were essentially King and Queen. When the big secret was let out (of Elizabeth's true self), the sacred area had been breached and she had no reason to put up any more of fantasy. I believe this is all about Elizabeth's ego. I don't think it was news to her that John was a POS. The important thing was that the fantasy went on - of her being a Great person and a great academic/strategic mind. He didn't serve her purposes any longer. . Edited by Mason, Jan 30 2010, 09:33 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| cks | Jan 30 2010, 09:33 AM Post #35 |
|
Personally, if I were Smith and Cooney, I would run away as far as possible from this case. However, all cases present interesting legal challenges and from the looks of things this one will as well. I agree with you, Joan, that it seems as if Young , his wife, and Hunter woke up one morning and realized that Edwards was playing them...and that furthermore, at some point, the gravy train was going to come to an end - maybe not that day, maybe not next month, but sometime. Without evidence, they wee going to be out in the cold. My guess is that Young has a LOT of evidence - perhaps some circumstantial, but still a LOT of evidence - this is what forced the Breck Boy to issue his statement, conveniently go to Haiti (where it would be difficult to interview him but where photos of a "concerned humanitarian" could be fed to a complicit media. Only now, since Edwards "manned up" the msm has decided that the story is legitimate to pursue. Young is no less a scumbag than his former hero (in my mind) and his wife is scurvy as well - what sort of an example have they set for their own children (they must wonder - is Frances Quin our sibling, a friend, exactly what?). Edwards and I would think his "sainted" soon to be former wife are both going to be in a heap of financial-legal difficulty. The games have only begun. |
![]() |
|
| Mason | Jan 30 2010, 09:35 AM Post #36 |
|
Parts unknown
|
Remember, we have sourced quotes of neighbors that said John and Elizabeth would look right at them and refuse to wave or smile. Their direct neighbors. So these other stories of aides having to serve them breakfast on weekends and holidays, when they have their own families, are consistent. |
![]() |
|
| Mason | Jan 30 2010, 09:38 AM Post #37 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. IMO, the MSM is still covering up. Claire Shipman (ABC) just had a big story about the "heroine" and great woman that Elizabeth Edwards really is. I guarantee you someone made a call to prompt (or request) that story. Notice how these stories praising EE fail to ponder why she had a book tour and did promo deals where she advertised she would let everyone know her feelings on the other woman. Elizabeth Edwards turned into one of those Praise Junkies and she was chasing that adoration. I think she thought that book and promo interviews was going to spurn another round of how great she was and bring condemnation on Hunter. Elizabeth Edwards' ego is running the show. . Edited by Mason, Jan 30 2010, 09:44 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Mason | Jan 30 2010, 09:51 AM Post #38 |
|
Parts unknown
|
. IMO, to many people, it was no surprise that John Edwards was all about John and everything that served that end. The real story was the true Elizabeth Edwards. Does anyone believe now that she wanted John to run for Prez for the American people or for John? I don't think there is any doubt - it was for Elizabeth. |
![]() |
|
| Joan Foster | Jan 30 2010, 10:04 AM Post #39 |
|
Tony, Young's book should be coupled with "Game Change" and taught in schools as an indictment of our media's partisan complicity, agenda and outright deception in their betrayal of trust with the American people. The public personas of Elizabeth and John Edwards were a deliberately created fiction. Only information that fed those images was allowed through the media filter. And the MSM wonders why most Americans neither trust them nor pay to access their "information?" |
![]() |
|
| Mason | Jan 30 2010, 10:28 AM Post #40 |
|
Parts unknown
|
I call it Myth-Making. That's what the overwhelming part of the media is set up to do now, IMO. . |
![]() |
|
| chatham | Jan 30 2010, 10:32 AM Post #41 |
|
Well, Young may be in court in Chatham county on monday. I may drive down to Pittsboro and sit there for awhile. |
![]() |
|
| Acc Esq | Jan 30 2010, 10:33 AM Post #42 |
|
J is correct. This part of the representation responding to the book is ancillary. |
![]() |
|
| cks | Jan 30 2010, 10:45 AM Post #43 |
|
Chatham - you will have to be the eyes and ears and give us the full report. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jan 30 2010, 11:13 AM Post #44 |
|
Deleted User
|
So these other stories of aides having to serve them breakfast on weekends and holidays, when they have their own families, are consistent I remember reading an interview with Elizabeth shortly after they moved into their new house. She was proudly talking about her kitchen and how its size allowed her to entertain all the family during the holidays. Is this the same family she referred to as hicks and rednecks? |
|
|
| abb | Jan 30 2010, 11:16 AM Post #45 |
|
They lie. Edited by abb, Jan 30 2010, 11:17 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · LIESTOPPERS UNDERGROUND · Next Topic » |






could be fed to a complicit media. Only now, since Edwards "manned up" the msm has decided that the story is legitimate to pursue. Young is no less a scumbag than his former hero (in my mind) and his wife is scurvy as well - what sort of an example have they set for their own children (they must wonder - is Frances Quin our sibling, a friend, exactly what?). 
9:29 AM Jul 11