- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| John Edwards' Sex Tape!; Media Not Interested - Again! | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 28 2009, 09:14 PM (809 Views) | |
| Lodge Pro 345 | Jun 28 2009, 09:14 PM Post #1 |
|
. Media has no Interest whatsoever in a reported John Edwards' Sex tape of him and his Mistress. No Interest whatsoever, No Surprise. Discussed what Music they would play at their Wedding! Aide tells of John Edwards' Sex Tape Former presidential candidate John Edwards is out of luck if he hoped that the extramarital affairs of Gov. Mark Sanford and Sen. John Ensign would take people’s minds off his own cheating scandal. Former Edwards aide Andrew Young says the ex-senator and his former mistress, Rielle Hunter, once made a sex tape, according to someone who has seen Young’s book proposal. St. Martin’s Press just inked a deal with Young, who also says in his proposal that, contrary to his public statement last year, he is not the father of Hunter’s infant daughter — Edwards is. Edwards has denied that. Young says that his belief in Edwards ran so deep that he agreed to take the fall for the candidate, inviting the pregnant Hunter to live with him, his wife, Cheri, and their three children. Later, after Hunter delivered the baby, Young and his family moved to a different home in California. While he was unpacking, Young discovered a videocassette, according to the book pitch. Hunter had been hired by the Edwards campaign to videotape the candidate’s movements, but this one is said to have shown him taking positions that weren’t on his official platform. The purported sex tape confirmed to Hunter that Edwards was even more reckless than he thought. According to our source, Hunter confided to Young that she and Edwards talked about getting married should the candidate’s cancer-stricken wife, Elizabeth, pass away, even discussing what music they’d play at their wedding. Elizabeth Edwards is said to hold Young partly to blame for her husband’s affair, since Young knew it was going on and sometimes used his cell phone to conference the senator and his girlfriend. Young has told friends that, in revenge, Elizabeth arranged for the media to learn about a youthful misdeameanor in which Young was arrested for stealing a sign from a biker bar. Elizabeth also suspects Young stole the baseball card collection of her late son, Wade, according to a source who says that she told Young in an e-mail that other former staff members “have passed lie detector tests.” Young’s proposal, which one editor said “was impossible to put down,” also contends that Sen. Edwards frequently clashed with running mate John Kerry during their 2004 race for the White House. And before Edwards owned up to his affair with Hunter, Young says he told him that Barack Obama had promised he’d make him attorney general if he didn’t pick him as his 2008 running mate. Elizabeth Edwards and Young’s agent had no comment. An e-mail to John Edwards’ assistant wasn’t returned. Hunter couldn’t be reached. http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/06/28/2009-06-28_aides_tale_of_john_edwards_sex_tape.html . |
![]() |
|
| retiredLEO | Jun 28 2009, 09:29 PM Post #2 |
|
Who really care about John Edwards, he is done, he can effect anything, my taxes, my life, nothing. He cheats on his wife, so what? My concern is who is going to effect my life and life style, John Edwards won't and probably never will.
Edited by retiredLEO, Jun 28 2009, 09:31 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Lodge Pro 345 | Jun 28 2009, 09:35 PM Post #3 |
|
. He can't affect any Policy? Can Al Gore have an impact on Policy? I say Yes. The first time they ignored everything about Edwards having a Mistress - traveling with him even - Edwards was the favorite for VP, and beyond that a shoo-in for a Cabinet post. The interest to me is that the Media still has no interest in Pursuing John Edwards - none. Campaign and financing Laws may have been broken. |
![]() |
|
| retiredLEO | Jun 28 2009, 10:12 PM Post #4 |
|
You are right Al Gore is in it for himself and money. I know campaign financing laws may have been violated, but I think the Obama campaign, violated those same laws. What happened there, we won't investigate, but we will investigate John McCanns. What is up with that? Forget Edwards and concentrate on the current crooks in the WH and Senate. Even when these campaign contributions are violated, nothing is ever done. Your right again Al Gore and his green companies stand to make millions, but this POTUS is stealing our money, through cap and trade, so Al Gore can get those millions, that is why we need to concentrate on Cap and Trade and Health Care. Who stands to benefit over the Health Care bill, the unions. We are in deep doo-doo and John Edwards is not involved in any of this. He is a lawyer, talks to dead people, and I don't think he owns any carbon credit companies yet, like Al Gore does. |
![]() |
|
| retiredLEO | Jun 28 2009, 11:24 PM Post #5 |
|
I guess I would add that now that John Edwards, doesn't have any position in the democratic party, the media goes after him. What about the others in the democratic party like, Dodd, Frank and Rangle? these are the ones that have some say in our laws and legislation, but the media won't even ask them a question about their activities. Only God knows how many crooks are in the US Congress and Senate. They seem to go after losers and say they are being fair in their reporting. John Edward is insignificant right now, Al may not be, but good old Al is out for good old Al. The one's I mentioned are out for themselves, but have more authority the good old Al Gore.
Edited by retiredLEO, Jun 28 2009, 11:27 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Lodge Pro 345 | Jun 28 2009, 11:36 PM Post #6 |
|
. He can effect you, living in the North, about as much as the Gov. of South Carolina then? It's a pattern. It's just like Biden's grown kids being totally off limits and Palin's being punching bags. . |
![]() |
|
| retiredLEO | Jun 28 2009, 11:49 PM Post #7 |
|
Joe Bidens kids are off limit, is because Joe Biden is a democrat. Even though all of Joe's kids are adults. I agree, a dem, it is off limits, a repulican, all is fair game. The media as we know it is no longer what I knew. |
![]() |
|
| longstop | Jun 29 2009, 12:05 AM Post #8 |
|
longstop
|
Allegedly rumor has it that the Hollywood Film Producers Union are making enquiries into the length of John Edwards sex tape ? Edited by longstop, Jun 29 2009, 12:07 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| cks | Jun 29 2009, 01:38 AM Post #9 |
|
The problem with Edwards is this.....just as Teddy Kennedy "recovered" from his behavior in the Kopechne case, so to can Edwards make a comeback from his sexual peccadillos. He has broken no law (at least in regards to his affair with Hunter - the money issue aside). while morally he is a cad that would not prevent the voters from overlooking that and voting the Breck boy into office again - nor would it stop the Democratic powers that be from utilizing his "talents" at some future point. Americans seem to have short memories when it comes to their politicians shortcomings (particularly if they are Democrats). Is it just me or did anyone else find it frightening that (according to the account of Young) that Obama was going to offer the shyster ambulance chaser the position of Attorney General? I always thought that there was some agreement between the Obama forces and Edwards in order to get his endorsement since there was harde work on both Obama's part and Clinton's part to get his support. |
![]() |
|
| Lodge Pro 345 | Jun 29 2009, 07:50 AM Post #10 |
|
. Very true cks. One has to be careful with people that can transition between America's so seamlessly. . |
![]() |
|
| Joan Foster | Mar 3 2012, 08:20 AM Post #11 |
|
http://www.wral.com/news/state/story/10807335/ Apparently, now Edwards does NOT want the sex tape destroyed. Assuming he does not need it for job-seeking film auditions...or his E Harmony application....anyone want to speculate WHY? Edited by Joan Foster, Mar 3 2012, 08:22 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| cks | Mar 3 2012, 08:29 AM Post #12 |
|
Perhaps a remembrance of things past? |
![]() |
|
| cks | Mar 3 2012, 08:35 AM Post #13 |
|
Seriously - there must be some sort of legal maneuvering that is going on. Some possible motivations: 1. use it to pressure Rielle to testify favorably in his behalf at the upcoming trial 2. to show somehow that he was the victim of a blackmail scam 3. perhaps to gain custody of little Quinn by showing her mother to be a slut (though of course what does that make him?????) 4. all of the above Given what is purported to be on the tape, I wold think that if it were shown in court that any jury would be grossed out......it is one thing to be told the details of an oral sex encounter but another to see it full blown on tape - I would think the jury would want to demand a bath after viewing it. That would not seem to go well for one's case should the jury leave the courtroom feeling such a way. |
![]() |
|
| Duke parent 2004 | Mar 3 2012, 09:25 AM Post #14 |
|
Far too much speculation here about the tape . . . Perhaps Liestoppers should petition for a viewing.. Of course we'd want to advance as reviewers mature and seasoned members no longer distracted by prurience. I'm available. |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Mar 3 2012, 10:16 AM Post #15 |
|
Considering what the tape is supposed to contain I doubt it will be a ringing endorsement of Edwards or a centerpiece of a campaign comeback. It was shot by a pregnant Reille as the Breck Boy... well you get the idea. They deserve each other. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · LIESTOPPERS UNDERGROUND · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2







7:49 PM Jul 10