| Duke Univ official charged; in child sex case | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jun 26 2009, 01:41 PM (14,173 Views) | |
| ~J~ is in Wonderland | Jul 6 2009, 07:43 PM Post #526 |
|
~J~ is in Wonderland
|
That's what I was thinking chatham. |
![]() |
|
| Truth Detector | Jul 6 2009, 08:17 PM Post #527 |
|
AMAZON.COM COULD CARE LESS! I received the following response to the email I sent regarding the child porn material under Lombard's wish list and the fact that he had been arrested for soliciting sex with his 5 year old son. "Thank you for writing to Amazon.com with your concern. I am sorry to hear that you are upset by this item's inclusion in our online toy store. (toy?) We believe that people have the right to choose their own reading material. Our goal is to support freedom of expression and provide customers with the broadest selection possible so they can find, discover and buy any title they might be seeking. That selection includes some titles which most people, including employees of Amazon.com may find distasteful or otherwise objectionable. However, Amazon.com believes it is censorship to make a publication unavailable to our customers because we believe its message to be repugnant. While we do not censor items from our website, I wanted to assure you that Amazon.com does not promote these kinds of titles. I have passed your comments along to the appropriate department. We value all feedback from our customers, and I thank you again for taking the time to send us your comments about this issue. I hope we will see you again at Amazon.com (NOT A CHANCE) Please let us know if this email resolved your question." I did let them know that their email did not resolve my concerns and laid out the facts as I knew them about this case and the name of the accused once again. I told them that I had to assume by their cavalier attitude that Amazon.com was not interested in the issue of sexually abused and molested children and as such I would make certain that I passed that message along to as many potential customers as I might come in contact with. I will not buy another item ever from these scrumbags! |
![]() |
|
| Lodge Pro 345 | Jul 6 2009, 08:43 PM Post #528 |
|
. That's true. They both have the name Lombard, okay. So, it looks like legally - Lombard is the Parent for both kids. Obits and local articles indicate both "functioned" as parents, it can be argued. . |
![]() |
|
| chatham | Jul 6 2009, 09:26 PM Post #529 |
|
Absolutely. One is as responsible as the other for the safety of the child(ren). As bad as some people may feel for Shipp he was the partner of lombard and was a parent to the kids and responsible for them and their care and their safety. I am sure shipp is feeling very bad for himself getting caught in the middle of this. But is being responsible for the kids well being an important part of being a parent? It may become apparent if details come out in the future to determine if the only reason Lombard adopted kids was to use them as sex agents for his own gratification. Shipp, IMO, being an integral part of the parenting care of the kids should have known. How long were Shipp and Lombard partners and when was the first boy adopted? Would sexual fantasies ever be discussed between two men who wish to be partners and then parents? Many, if not all couples, talk about some sexual fantasy wishes. Worse yet, IMO, is the acceptance of the eno commons community toward consensual adult sexual promiscuity while praising the community as paradise for its children. If it was their intent to create a sexual paradise for adults while the children ran through the flower filled fields then they should have cloistered their neighborhood and worn only fig leaves. But they should not have advertised their physical wants over their spiritual needs. In the meantime, they have failed themselves, their neighbors and the entire community of Durham. |
![]() |
|
| maggiesnotebook | Jul 6 2009, 09:31 PM Post #530 |
|
Well, well...they are so tolerant but sure wanted to shield Lombard's wish list! |
![]() |
|
| maggiesnotebook | Jul 6 2009, 09:34 PM Post #531 |
|
They didn't advertise "spiritual." In fact, to "Shared Spiritual Path" the answer was No. |
![]() |
|
| maggiesnotebook | Jul 6 2009, 09:48 PM Post #532 |
|
The title below is not mine. I found it at a blogcatalog - Morons in Chapel Hill. This lady was out of, but now back in jail for contacting the 10 year old student. Who would let a man or woman out of jail after molesting a 10 year old. Anyway, thought this forum would be interested in the title on the article: http://www.blogcatalog.com/search.frame.php?term=frank+lombard&id=08678e605f3592d98498f7302b52719c From The Frank Lombard School of Public Education: Teacher's Aid Jail For Sex With Student Durham, N.C. — A judge set a $2 million secured bond Monday for former Durham County teacher's assistant accused of having sex with a 10-year-old student. Gina Marie Watring, 40, of 106 Cricket Ground, was charged April 29 with two counts of first-degree sex offense with a child. Durham County Sheriff's Office investigators said she had sex with a Creekside Elementary School student on April 10 and April 21. Watring was released on a $200,000 unsecured bond and ordered not to contact the victim while awaiting trial. On Saturday, she was arrested again and charged with obstruction of justice. According to the arrest warrant, she contacted the student between June 29 and July 3. |
![]() |
|
| Truth Detector | Jul 6 2009, 11:25 PM Post #533 |
|
106 Cricket Ground - is this in Eno Commons? Her initial bond was $200,000 Bond is much higher in Durham if the accused is being framed by the DA. Edited by Truth Detector, Jul 6 2009, 11:33 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| ~J~ is in Wonderland | Jul 7 2009, 06:50 AM Post #534 |
|
~J~ is in Wonderland
|
LP has asked me to start a Part 11 on this thread. He will link them, he thinks this thread is getting to big to follow. Duke Univ official charged; in child sex case Part 11 Edited by ~J~ is in Wonderland, Jul 7 2009, 06:56 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Lodge Pro 345 | Jul 7 2009, 07:28 AM Post #535 |
|
. NEW THREAD: http://s1.zetaboards.com/Liestoppers_meeting/topic/1921680/1/#new . |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic » |




4:15 AM Nov 24