| Plaintiffs’ Response to Nifong’s Motion to Dismiss | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 31 2009, 12:32 AM (8,070 Views) | |
| Lodge Pro 345 | Jan 31 2009, 04:19 PM Post #31 |
|
. Nifong enjoyed incredible support. One City-Councilman just refused to criticize him, even after all the facts were known to the general public saying he had to live with himself. Another question is why did Baker and City defend Gottlieb like they did when it was apparent he had fabricated evidence and ignored Police Policy and the law? |
![]() |
|
| MikeZPU | Jan 31 2009, 04:24 PM Post #32 |
|
No, I do not see any substantive difference betweem Kim's 3/22 story and the captain's version of events AND that's exactly why Gottlieb had to act to make sure that Kim did not talk to the press. And then Nifong made Kim the sweet deal in order to get Kim to say that she was away from Mangum longer than 5 minutes. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jan 31 2009, 04:29 PM Post #33 |
|
Deleted User
|
Recently Lodge Pro posted a drawing of a sinking ship with the caption "Durham". I thought it was a great visual. However, the one you just described, Clowns would make the perfect sign to hold up at the hearing. I would recommend a billboard size erected along I-85 and I-40. |
|
|
| Bill Anderson | Jan 31 2009, 04:31 PM Post #34 |
|
My fervent hope is that Nifong will run out of places to hide. Granted, we are dealing with a person incapable of shame, which is why he really needed to be tried on criminal charges, convicted, and sent to prison. We need to get psychopathic criminals like him off the streets.
|
![]() |
|
| MikeZPU | Jan 31 2009, 04:36 PM Post #35 |
|
I forgot to add that as part of the sweet deal that Nifong offered Kim Roberts, Kim also agreed to place the boys in the bathroom together with Mangum. See Joe Neff's story below. In fact, we'll probably never know all that Kim agreed to say or do in exchange for the sweet deal that Nifong gave her. http://www.newsobserver.com/news/crime_safety/duke_lacrosse/story/565155.html Wilson's actions shape the case Joseph Neff - Staff Writer Published: Wed, Apr. 18, 2007 12:30AMModified Wed, Apr. 18, 2007 03:04AM Linwood Wilson has been Mike Nifong's go-to guy. In May, he orchestrated the arrest of Moezeldin Elmostafa, the taxi driver who attested to Reade Seligmann's alibi. In July, he came up with a new statement from Kim Roberts, the second dancer at the March 13 party. When first contacted by police, Roberts said the rape allegations were a "crock." According to Wilson, that account changed July 24, when Roberts and her attorney visited Nifong. Roberts was facing possible prison time on a probation violation. As Roberts' attorney met with Nifong, Roberts sat in a conference room. When Wilson popped in to say hello, Roberts volunteered new details, saying for the first time that Crystal Gail Mangum was in the bathroom with players. "I need to tell you guys that I have thought about the time frame that night," Roberts said, according to Wilson's account. "I had originally said I wasn't away from her [Mangum] for more than 5 minutes but after thinking about it and what all I did it was more like 15 minutes or maybe a little more. "...When I got inside I went into the master bedroom where some guys were watching TV and I could hear her [Crystal] in the bathroom with some guys, you know the door was open slightly I started to go in but one of the guys stepped in front of me. I told her I was leaving you know, through the door, and I turned around and went back to my car." Roberts declined to comment Tuesday, saying the case was over. |
![]() |
|
| sdsgo | Jan 31 2009, 04:43 PM Post #36 |
|
MikeZPU, were the cops present at the meeting on July 24th? MikeZPU: In fact, we'll probably never know all that Kim agreed to say or do in exchange for the sweet deal that Nifong gave her. -- I suspect the plaintiffs' already know. If not, it will come out in discovery. Edited by sdsgo, Jan 31 2009, 04:47 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Kerri P. | Jan 31 2009, 04:52 PM Post #37 |
|
What billboards those would be.
|
![]() |
|
| chatham | Jan 31 2009, 04:52 PM Post #38 |
|
There were more than just Kim and Elmo who were offered deals and harassed. There were cops that wanted to talk saying something was wrong. We never heard from them and some of them got promotions later on for their silence. Some sweet deals came to some of the early cop players who also got promotions for putting out the wanted posters from crime stoppers and others who allowed the frame to continue. Shelton got harassed. This whole case is about people who got sweet deals because they either said nothing or participated in the crimes. That also goes for levicy and others at Duke including the G-88 who got a department as well as what we are seeing now, deanships, etc. Yes, a whole lot of people made out really good at the expense of RCD and all the their LAX players, their parents and coach Pressler.
Edited by chatham, Jan 31 2009, 04:53 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| MikeZPU | Jan 31 2009, 05:10 PM Post #39 |
|
I don't think so. Remember it was Gottlieb and Clayton who served the warrant on Kim Roberts, very shortly after she gave a detailed statement to Himan basically backing up the version of events told by the team captains. And we all know what was said to Elmo, after the same two cops served a warrant on him, as they drove him back to the station. Check out this except from Himan's notes. He seems to get a little edgy when the SPs want Kim Pitman/Roberts to clarify some discrepancies. Himan take advantage of a way out ... 3/11/07 1425hrs - Mary Winstead and Jim Coman arrive and are brought up to second floor cid conference room for an interview with Kim Pittman. Mr. Simeon arrived and advised me that he thought his client might be late and he was wondering about the day light savings time that had adjusted on the same date. Kim Pittman arrived and both Mr. Simeon and Kim Pittman were signed in at the desk. I escorted Mr. Simeon and Kim Pittman up to the second floor where Mr. Coman and Mrs. Winstead introduced themselves. Mr. Coman began with what the intention of the interview was, if she could shed some light on some of the discrepancies in “Precious” Crystal Mangum’s statements she had made. Kim Pittman became visibly upset and started questioning why she was even there - she stated that she had already given a statement. Mr. Coman emphasized that he just wanted to clarify some of the information that had been given to him. She then stated that if they needed her testimony and wanted to talk to her they would have to subpoena her. She asked her lawyer if she had to be there, and I advised her that it was totally voluntary. She then got up and stated she was leaving. I escorted her down to the first floor where i took her visitor and badge and signed her out. |
![]() |
|
| sdsgo | Jan 31 2009, 05:44 PM Post #40 |
|
Mike, I think you might be reading too much into the 3/11/07 meeting. Himan may well have been in on the shenanigans, but he accurately recorded both 3/22/06 and 3/11/07 meetings in his notes. Also, the police were well within their rights to serve the arrest warrant on 3/22/06, and Himan was legally correct to advise her the meeting was totally voluntary and escort her out when she got up to leave. Anything else could have constituted a false arrest. |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Jan 31 2009, 06:00 PM Post #41 |
|
Nice work Mike ZPU.. Kim probably knew it wasn't safe to buck the system and to be honest when faced with the Powers that be in Durham she couldn't afford to say anything. Who knows if she was threaten she might have a case against the DA Office & Durham PD. It would probably only have credence after a judgment against the defendants in the three lawsuits. Especially when someone sills the beans. Why Not? If you are going to have a big weenie roast throw another one on the bbq! Edited by Baldo, Jan 31 2009, 07:04 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Lodge Pro 345 | Jan 31 2009, 06:22 PM Post #42 |
|
. Her lawyer was the table. I think her lawyer should've advised her - not a cop that has signed false affidavits in the case and intimidated witnesses (like the guy from the hotel room). The SP's are lawyers - I think it's strange for Himan to insert himself here. This doesn't bode too well for Himan. This is from his deposition. ![]()
|
![]() |
|
| chatham | Jan 31 2009, 06:30 PM Post #43 |
|
So Kim Pittman cant even sue anyone because she lied...oops, changed her story? |
![]() |
|
| Lodge Pro 345 | Jan 31 2009, 06:35 PM Post #44 |
|
. Himan admits that he knew Crystal or Kim was lying in the first days of the case. Yet, they were happy to give Kim a deal to be a prosecution witness. ![]()
|
![]() |
|
| MikeZPU | Jan 31 2009, 06:57 PM Post #45 |
|
The 3/11/07 excerpt from Himan's notes was mainly for fun; it was not a main component of any argument that I was trying to make here today. Like chatham points out, Kim turned and asked her lawyer if she had to stay; she didn't ask Himan. Also, the SPs were running the meeting; Himan was just an observer. As chatham noted, it's interesting that Himan nonetheless quickly interjected and told Kim it was "totally voluntary." Once he said that, do you think Himan had a good idea whether Kim would stay and answer questions? Remember, it was Himan who recorded detailed notes of Kim Robert's extensive statement on 3/22/06 pretty much backing up the team captains' story; Himan also recorded her very first statement to him that the sexual assault allegation was a "bunch of crock." I'm picturing a bead of sweat forming on Himan's brow as this meeting starts with Himan looking for a way out (Remember those Southwest commercials "Want to get away?" )Edited by MikeZPU, Jan 31 2009, 08:58 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic » |






put his head between his legs & kiss his ass goodbye.


with Himan looking for a way out (Remember those Southwest 
7:37 PM Jul 10