|
Viewing Single Post From: Updated Duke Lacrosse Case Chronology March 13-31, 2006
|
|
nyesq83
|
Jul 6 2009, 09:32 AM
|
|
- Posts:
- 514
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #239
- Joined:
- Apr 29, 2008
|
- jmoo
- Jul 5 2009, 05:16 PM
Gottlieb's State Bar Deposition re: the list prepared for City Council: Brocker questioning his note taking and when he typed up his notes... - Quote:
-
"It's kind of confusing because there were typewritten notes that were made up very early on in the case, and that was a typewritten document for -- we were ordered to put something together for the City Manager to review to give a presentation to City Council.
"And when I prepared that section, we went through and actually delected almost all of it. It got down to a point where it didn't say anything, and that is what was finally turned in."
Sure would be nice to have those original PD notes -- notes that Baker had PD edit "to [the] point that they didn't say anything". In other words, he admits he destroyed evidence in the case...
|
|
|