Viewing Single Post From: 20 Questions (from KC) from 2006

Viewing Single Post From: 20 Questions (from KC) from 2006
nyesq83	Jul 1 2009, 02:31 PM
Posts: 514 Group: Members Member #239 Joined: Apr 29, 2008	LTC8K6 Jul 1 2009, 11:39 AM The illegaly changed documents went from "absolutly" to "my knowledge". That is not the same and as far as I know neither the nurses or doctor's notes have ever been published so no one knows if anything was changed or altered. Neither Ms Jean or any other lawyer at the bar hearing, under oath, ever questioned "altering" of the rape report put in the rape kit. The disbarment hearing was for Nifong, the panel members were not charged with investigation of the criminal activity of Nifong's co-conspirators. If you will remember, F. Lane Williamson nixed the Fong's mouthpiece's attempt to have Levicy declared an "expert witness" because that would have been a whole other circus, and it wasn't necessary. Levicy was a fact witness in an (administrative) disbarment hearing, not a witness in a civil or criminal case. Funny, isn't it, her 'facts' kept on changing...(just as Brodhead admitted, and told us)...to fit Nifong's slowly evolving theory of the case - a theory that was non-existent at first since he told us repeatedly he purposefully had no knowledge of any facts of the case, but just his theory, that - each and every time - was coincidentally changed to counteract or nullify or explain every defendant-favorable fact and alibi released by both the prosecution and the defense. She was not a dispassionate medical professional testifying to scientific certainties based on objective criteria. She was squirming in her seat trying not to get caught in even more egregious and obvious lies. Edited by nyesq83, Jul 1 2009, 02:33 PM.


20 Questions (from KC) from 2006 · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers