|
Viewing Single Post From: 20 Questions (from KC) from 2006
|
|
chatham
|
Jul 1 2009, 02:29 PM
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,800
- Group:
- Tier1
- Member
- #308
- Joined:
- May 2, 2008
|
- Sherp
- Jul 1 2009, 11:44 AM
- LTC8K6
- Jul 1 2009, 11:39 AM
The illegaly changed documents went from "absolutly" to "my knowledge". That is not the same and as far as I know neither the nurses or doctor's notes have ever been published so no one knows if anything was changed or altered. Neither Ms Jean or any other lawyer at the bar hearing, under oath, ever questioned "altering" of the rape report put in the rape kit. 
Okay LTC, what of that statement is not true????
Aren't illegally changed documents illegal? and if no one knows if anything was changed or altered then how can they be illegal? The purpose of levicy's forced appearance at the bar hearing was to confirm nifongs lie that condoms were used. Levicy confirmed no condoms were used. It was not about levicy.
|
|
|
11:40 AM Dec 2
