Viewing Single Post From: KC responds on Iqbal

Viewing Single Post From: KC responds on Iqbal
Baldo	Jul 1 2009, 09:02 AM
Posts: 8,468 Group: Tier2 Member #45 Joined: Apr 28, 2008	KC makes some great point in responding to the defendant's filings. We shall see what the Plaintiff's responses are. I have been pondering a question. Was Jamie's filing a mistake for some of the defendants at this time? Did she expect a dismissal of the complaint by Judge Beaty? Surely she must have expected Judge Beaty to request briefs. Did that serve the best interest of the defendants? The question seems to be. Have the Plaintiffs presented enough evidence in their prior to Iqbal filing to pass the new bar level that Iqbal seems to demand? At the worst I fully expect Judge Beaty to allow the Plaintiff's attorney to reformulate their complaints to include more evidence to show each defendant's action were calculated to deny the plaintiff's civil rights and in actuality harm them by illegal, discriminatory, and deceitful actions. It seems Jamie's filing opens the door for more damning information to come out prior to depositions. Was it a cure which will eventually kill the patient? Personally I believe Duke should have settled the claim and removed themselves from the other Durham miscreants. By now I imagine they will have spent tens of millions just to fight this when they could have separated themselves with that money in a settlement. But that's rub, maybe they can't! Edited by Baldo, Jul 1 2009, 09:03 AM.


KC responds on Iqbal · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers