| Viewing Single Post From: KC responds on Iqbal | |
|---|---|
| Quasimodo | Jul 1 2009, 08:17 AM |
|
4.) Linwood Is Back The always entertaining Attorney pro-se Linwood Wilson, proving again the aphorism that a man who represents himself has a fool for a client, filed a three-paragraph memo on the matter, asserting the following: “In order not to be repetitive and overbearing on the court, Defendant Linwood Wilson joins Defendants Mark Gottlieb, Benjamin Himan, and the City of Durham, North Carolina, Durham Supervisors, in their Supplemental Briefs In [sic, cap.] Support of their [sic, cap.] Motions to Dismiss.” Yet the whole thrust of Attorney Wilson’s previous arguments has been that his client, fired ex-Nifong investigator Wilson, should not be considered in any way a Durham employee, and that his legal status as an employee of Nifong gave him absolute immunity for any of his misdeeds. So why, now, are Wilson’s interests and those of former DPD members Himan and Gottlieb aligned? The Wilson brief doesn’t say. Perhaps Attorney Wilson can consult with Client Wilson and file a supplemental brief in the future. |
 |
|
| KC responds on Iqbal · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers | |
9:47 AM Nov 29
