| Viewing Single Post From: Blog and Media Roundup - Tuesday, June 30, 2009 | |
|---|---|
| abb | Jun 30 2009, 05:26 AM |
|
http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=81627 Another Duke Rape Case The Media Distorts Remember 2006 when the media was gung-ho to tell you about a black stripper raped by the Duke Lacrosse team? They characterized it as some poor, black single mother brutalized by rich Southern whites (no matter that the accused were from Southern states like New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Maryland). Yes, it was the liberal media's wet dream fitting all their favorite stereotypes: white vs. black, rich vs. poor, male vs. female. They couldn't wait to string these men up by their genitals. Only the local media was interested in poking holes through the woman's story, finding out that she had a past history of drug abuse, prostitution and was, shall we say, veracity-challenged? Even her father told reporters that the story was bad *if* it were true. IF?? Her own dad doubts her?? Well, we all know what happened. The DNA didn't match, even as the DA announced that it did. The DA was eventually disbarred and tossed out of office and the media, for all their lying and mischaracterization, offered no apology for their own role in the witch hunt. So now comes word of another arrest at Duke, this time by a faculty member and, this time, the rape involves an African-American by a homosexual. Oops. The media failed to give you those last two details. Here's the AP report: Quote: A Duke University official has been arrested and charged with offering a 5-year-old boy for sex. Frank Lombard, the school's associate director of the Center for Health Policy, was arrested after an Internet sting, according to the FBI's Washington field office and the city's police department. According to an affidavit by District of Columbia Police Detective Timothy Palchak, an unidentified informant facing charges in a separate child sex case led authorities to Lombard. Authorities said that Lombard tried to persuade a person — who he did not know was a police officer — to travel to North Carolina to have sex with a child. The detective's affidavit charges Lombard said in an online chat that he had sexually molested the boy. The court papers say Lombard also invited the undercover detective to North Carolina to have sex with the young boy and even suggested which hotel he should use. But it isn't until you piece together some local reporting that you find out that Lombard is a gay man living with his "partner" (whose role in this whole deed has yet to be established) and that there were two children living in the house that were both African-American. Lombard's role at Duke was to study health care disparities among HIV/AIDS sufferers in the rural South. So, here you have a case of a rich, white Duke man abusing a poor young black child and this time we have the word of the federal government, not a stripper/prostitute but will there be nightly reports by the mainstream media or candlelight vigils at Duke? Hell, no. That's because the liberals will not have gay adoption placed in a bad light nor create friction between the gay movement and civil rights crowd. Much like the rape and murder of Jesse Dirkhising in 1999 by two gay men, the media will be largely silent about this because it doesn't fit their prejudices and stereotypes. Like most things touched by the mainstream media, ask yourself what facts are they distorting and what facts are they hiding. |
 |
|
| Blog and Media Roundup - Tuesday, June 30, 2009 · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers | |
12:33 AM Nov 30
