Viewing Single Post From: KC responds on Iqbal

Viewing Single Post From: KC responds on Iqbal
Tidbits	Jun 29 2009, 06:40 PM
Posts: 5,242 Group: Tier1 Member #141 Joined: Apr 28, 2008	This tends to support my theory that Wilson has the best attorney, and is getting the best deal for his money. KC misses one purpose of the briefs. Fees fees fees. Without looking at the documents or analyzing it, my instinct is that KC reads more importance into the lawyer's Lamb comments than the court will. It may be largely ignored. Time will tell. Elsewhere I said that the defendants might gain more ground if they skipped the foolish arguments. When they make a bunch of filler arguments the judge may get on a roll saying, "no, no, no." Will the judge work hard to find something worthwhile in the pile of paper? Why should he do the work the lawyers should have done? He has other things to do. Edited by Tidbits, Jun 29 2009, 06:41 PM.


KC responds on Iqbal · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers