| Viewing Single Post From: Dr. Meehan, anyone? | |
|---|---|
| sdsgo | Jun 25 2009, 02:09 PM |
|
Mike, The second ruling was in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts. The court simply held that analysts’ reports were testimonial; and therefore, subject to the Crawford confrontation rules. You can read the full opinion here: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/08pdf/07-591.pdf Take a good look at Section C beginning on page 11. |
![]() |
|
| Dr. Meehan, anyone? · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers | |




4:58 AM Dec 6