| Viewing Single Post From: Dr. Meehan, anyone? | |
|---|---|
| Quasimodo | Jun 25 2009, 12:43 PM |
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/25/AR2009062501690_pf.html Supreme Court Rules School's Strip Search of Girl Was Illegal By Robert Barnes Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, June 25, 2009 1:17 PM The Supreme Court ruled today that Arizona school officials violated the constitutional rights of a 13-year-old girl when they subjected her to a strip search on the suspicion she might be hiding ibuprofen in her underwear. (snip) In what was the court's next to last day in issuing decisions from the 2008-2009 term, the justices also: -- Ruled 5 to 4 that forensic reports prepared for criminal trials are the same as testimony for the prosecution and that those who prepare them must be available for cross-examination by defense lawyers. The dissenters said such a requirement was a dramatic change in criminal proceedings and could have a debilitating impact on the criminal justice system. [Not sure if this includes only persons who work for the DA, or if it also includes outside specialists hired by the prosecutor] (snip) The court will conclude its term Monday. Edited by Quasimodo, Jun 25 2009, 12:44 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Dr. Meehan, anyone? · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers | |




12:55 AM Dec 7