Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: Updated Duke Lacrosse Case Chronology March 13-31, 2006
~J~ is in Wonderland
Member Avatar
~J~ is in Wonderland
chatham
Jun 21 2009, 10:47 AM
It indeed will be interesting once the depositions begin. I want to know how many times and how often the Duke Council of frame met and discussed this case. I want to know when the first meeting was. I want to know how many times Duke and the City of Durham met or talked on the phone. I want to know when that first meeting was. I want to know how Dean Sue concluded it would be only a minor assault charge when ALL the evidence pointed to no contact with anyone. What was in the Duke report sent to Dean Sue at 7:30 that morning. Was it her conclusion or a higher up like Moneta to say what kind of charges may be forthcoming? Did they ever look at the evidence or just read the DukePD report? If the DPD knew on the 14th and the Duke PD knew on the 14th and dean sue knew on the 14th and nifong knew on the 14th and the mayor probably knew on the 14th then why did brodhead not know on the 14th? Did he lie like nifong lied about when he learned about the case? And why was he the only one left in the dark? What was the NCCU chancellors role in this. Was it to emphasize the race issue or abate the race issue. Why was the story NCCU at all if CGM was a stripper on her own time? Who made this an NCCU story?

AMAZING
Quote:
 
Who made this an NCCU story?


well lets see here,

Victoria and a hand full of her friends

Jesse Jackson

Nifong and enablers

Cash (shake)

The Panthers

NAACP

The media

I don't think we can blame CGM for a NCCU story, as far as we know she didn't return to the campus for a long time.
Offline Profile Quote Post
Updated Duke Lacrosse Case Chronology March 13-31, 2006 · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers