| Viewing Single Post From: Updated Duke Lacrosse Case Chronology March 13-31, 2006 | |
|---|---|
| chatham | Jun 19 2009, 04:09 PM |
|
March 17th Gottlieb e-mail to the TP listserv only mentioned a party, not a stripper party. Why? If it was a stripper party would anyone believe a rape claim? Even the N&O article that day only mentioned a party. Maybe they got the info from someone employed by the N&O in their Durham office who are on the listserv |
![]() |
|
| Updated Duke Lacrosse Case Chronology March 13-31, 2006 · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers | |




10:40 PM Nov 28