| Viewing Single Post From: Updated Duke Lacrosse Case Chronology March 13-31, 2006 | |
|---|---|
| Baldo | Jun 19 2009, 04:08 PM |
|
Yes, sort of shoots the idea Duke's Senior Administration didn't know about it. ...the official report of the Duke Police Department was submitted and reviewed by the Duke Police Director, Robert Dean, at 7:30 a.m. on March 14. This report indicated clearly that the individual making the allegations was a black woman—though information about her race and about the racial aspects of the case did not reach key administrators (including President Brodhead) until March 24. The substance of the report, including the fact that the students involved were lacrosse players but not the fact that the presumed victim was black, was communicated by Mr. Dean by phone to the Assistant Vice President of Student Affairs and Dean of Students, Sue Wasiolek, on the morning of March 14. Dean Wasiolek immediately contacted the lacrosse coach, the Director of Athletics, and others in the athletics department, who in turn contacted members of the lacrosse team. Dean Wasiolek also contacted her supervisor, Vice President for Student Affairs Larry Moneta, but neither Wasiolek nor Moneta was aware of the racial aspects of the situation until March 24—a gap in communications that is extraordinary. *The initial Wasiolek/Moneta round of communications reached the Executive Vice President (EVP), Tallman Trask, but not members of the academic side of the Duke administration or the President until much later. The Public Affairs office was not briefed until Friday, March 17 (after having first learned of the incident that day by monitoring a community listserv).... THE DUKE ADMINISTRATION'S RESPONSE TO LACROSSE ALLEGATIONS William G. Bowen and Julius L. Chambers May 4, 2006 |
 |
|
| Updated Duke Lacrosse Case Chronology March 13-31, 2006 · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers | |
10:27 AM Nov 30
