| The start | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 24 2009, 08:44 PM (782 Views) | |
| Dendric Stark | Feb 24 2009, 08:44 PM Post #1 |
|
Well, was just wondering if anyone else will be RPing while we wait for season 5 to get started, and if anyone knows when they will want (or suspect to know) when season five will start. Just cause I am curious. |
![]() |
|
| The White Bull | Feb 25 2009, 05:46 PM Post #2 |
|
My Travian experiment has come to an end. I haven't felt like such a degenerate in years, and I only played that game for a month. Some people play it for a whole year. I could probably be ready to climb back on and get started in the next couple of weeks. |
![]() |
|
| Cenedil | Feb 25 2009, 09:51 PM Post #3 |
|
I'm ready whenever |
![]() |
|
| The Gunslinger | Feb 28 2009, 11:07 PM Post #4 |
|
Administrator
|
I can get the map up and everything ready whenver. What works for you guys works for me. Anyways, apologies for nothing at all happening around here lately. I've been working on a different project with a friend, and it's been incredibly time-consuming. |
![]() |
|
| Dendric Stark | Mar 1 2009, 12:04 AM Post #5 |
|
Well, im set and good to go. What kinda a project? If its not a secret experiment or anything not a problem.
|
![]() |
|
| The White Bull | Mar 2 2009, 08:37 AM Post #6 |
|
To confirm we're going to keep it to two of the seven kingdoms correct? Also are we going to start with more than one city as some had suggested? |
![]() |
|
| The Gunslinger | Mar 7 2009, 01:22 AM Post #7 |
|
Administrator
|
Yes, it'll take place in two of the seven kingdoms. I don't know about the starting cities yet; starting with 3-5 was the plan when using the full map, however since we're going to have far fewer cities, it might not be a good idea. I can't say for sure until the game starts, but I believe starting position will be even more crucial this time around. If players start off with several cities they could be able to block off certain players/routes. I can see the advantage in having multiple cities to start with, however. Less NPC battles, which are definitely the weak point in the game. Once I actually finish making the map I'll take a look at things and decide which option is appropriate. Dendric: The project I'm working on is just another forum with a friend. Edited by The Gunslinger, Mar 7 2009, 01:23 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Dendric Stark | Mar 7 2009, 02:55 AM Post #8 |
|
Well, we could use full map with more citys, to keep more true to the way things were left off at the end of this season, as an option. |
![]() |
|
| The White Bull | Mar 8 2009, 11:43 AM Post #9 |
|
I like starting with more than one city, even if only use two territories, which I believe would be the best. For example the Reach and Dorne hate each other. Combined there are 28 cities in the two territories. I bet we could get 8 or so solid players involved. If each player starts with 3 cities. We could have the Two NPC capitols and then a third open city. There would only be 3 total NPC battles needed, PVP would start right away in earnest, and if a player were to lose a city, they would not necessarily be crippled right away. |
![]() |
|
| Chugman | Mar 8 2009, 04:55 PM Post #10 |
|
Plan on dividing up my dornish empire?(jk) I like the Idea. it works into the idea of houses. A major house would have it's capital and then several smaller houses would have theirs under the major house. I would like to see the return of alliances or maybe just a four vs four as the Dornish players and the Reach players duke it out. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |






not a problem.
3:59 AM Jul 11