Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Peter Fonda - domestic terrorist; He went too far
Topic Started: Jun 21 2018, 11:25 PM (335 Views)
Pat
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Icy, why not admit it, you don't give a crap about Baron Trump or what might happen to him were he kidnapped. All you think about is your campaign against the police for some alleged wrong that happened to you.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
icy-woman
Member Avatar
Silver Star Member
[ * ]
Oh, almost forgot. We have to lock up The Boogeyman-

. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2vJN3st5T4

He clearly said he was coming to get Trump,, and he might have slobbered on him.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
icy-woman
Member Avatar
Silver Star Member
[ * ]
cy, why not admit it, you don't give a crap about Baron Trump or what might happen to him were he kidnapped. All you think about is your campaign against the police for some alleged wrong that happened to you.

I do not know Baron Trump to like or dislike him. Same with any of Trump's family. I do know enough about Trump to not trust him. I know less about Peter Fonda and no, I don't take what he says seriously like you seem to do. You want to lock the man up for what he says or might have said even after he takes it back and admits he was wrong. But you have no problem with the cops who scream right in my face that they are going to kill me with a gun pointed an inch from my nose. Even when they beat, abduct rape, again and again to the point where My life is destroyed and I have nothing left to take.

Here's the danger in going after Peter Fonda. It opens the door and sends a message. Dare not speak out against king Trump and his terrorist goons. Do you want the people to fear Trump as much as N Koreans fear Kim? I know you like the guy, but do you want to force everyone else to like the guy too?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Banandangees
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
ImaHeadaU
Jun 22 2018, 10:58 PM
Banandangees
Jun 22 2018, 06:35 PM
What is so special about "I will" or "you will" over "maybe we should" and "should be."

It is the difference between a direct stated intent and a vague speculation on something that may be one might want to think about doing.

I get it now. So, "I will," "you will" and we will have "actual intent"..... like when Strozk indicated, "We'll stop it"

PAGE: “Trump’s not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”

STRZOK (Chief of the Counterespionage Section of FBI... a powerful position) : “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it
.”


So, according to your interpretation, Strozk (Chief of the Counterespionage Section of FBI... a powerful position), he/they (Page and Strozk) actually intended to stop it.... to actually prevent Trump from becoming president. That's the responsibility of the FBI??? .... to interfere with a presidential election. How is that not even worse than what the government is accusing Russia of.


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ImaHeadaU
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Banandangees
Jun 23 2018, 12:14 AM
like when Strozk indicated, "We'll stop it"

PAGE: “Trump’s not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”

STRZOK (Chief of the Counterespionage Section of FBI... a powerful position) : “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it
.”
Did they say how? My guess is that their intent was to join other like minded voters at the ballot box.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Banandangees
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
ImaHeadaU
Jun 23 2018, 12:45 AM
Banandangees
Jun 23 2018, 12:14 AM
like when Strozk indicated, "We'll stop it"

PAGE: “Trump’s not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”

STRZOK (Chief of the Counterespionage Section of FBI... a powerful position) : “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it
.”
Did they say how? My guess is that their intent was to join other like minded voters at the ballot box.

No! I think you were right the first time.... that they had "actual intent," they didn't mention anyone else. And, the average U.S. citizen would feel that if the Chief of the Counterespionage Section of FBI... (powerful position), was powerful enough to do it. And if he/they are powerful enough to do it to a presidential candidate, he/they are powerful enough to do it to anybody. Scary, what our government has "progressed" to over the last 8 years.
Edited by Banandangees, Jun 23 2018, 12:57 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ImaHeadaU
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Banandangees
Jun 23 2018, 12:56 AM
ImaHeadaU
Jun 23 2018, 12:45 AM
Banandangees
Jun 23 2018, 12:14 AM
like when Strozk indicated, "We'll stop it"

PAGE: “Trump’s not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”

STRZOK (Chief of the Counterespionage Section of FBI... a powerful position) : “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it
.”
Did they say how? My guess is that their intent was to join other like minded voters at the ballot box.

No! I think you were right the first time.... that they had "actual intent," they didn't mention anyone else. And, the average U.S. citizen would feel that if the Chief of the Counterespionage Section of FBI... (powerful position), was powerful enough to do it. And if he/they are powerful enough to do it to a presidential candidate, he/they are powerful enough to do it to anybody. Scary, what our government has "progressed" to over the last 8 years.
It's hard to know what many U,S, citizens are prepared to believe without sound basis. After all, many seem to believe most of what the president says in spite of thousands of his statements having been shown to be untrue.

Strzok used the word "We" without qualifier. As such it is up to the reader to decide who was or wasn't included.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Banandangees
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
I think you are being somewhat more ambiguous in you answers. You said "actual intent" originally. I was just starting to believe you, now I don't know what to think as you are now being more "subjective," more "vague," more "speculative" in your answer when before (in your explanation of "I will," "you will,") you seemed more definite, more objective, in saying "active intent."
Edited by Banandangees, Jun 23 2018, 01:49 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ImaHeadaU
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Banandangees
Jun 23 2018, 01:46 AM
I think you are being somewhat more ambiguous in you answers. You said "actual intent" originally. I was just starting to believe you, now I don't know what to think as you are now being more "subjective," more "vague," more "speculative" in your answer when before (in your explanation of "I will," "you will,") you seemed more definite, more objective, in saying "active intent."
I'm no more speculative than you are when you interpret Strozk's "We" to mean the FBI.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jim Miller
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Why even bother with Imathecoward. He loves to play his word games aka "the crawdaddy".
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Website Traffic Analysis