Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
A victory for election integrity
Topic Started: Jun 12 2018, 01:02 PM (62 Views)
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
A victory for election integrity

The Supreme Court issued a decision today in Husted v. A. Phillip Randolph Institute, a case involving Ohio’s voter list maintenance policies. By a 5-4 vote, the Court upheld Ohio’s policy of removing ineligible and outdated voters from it rolls. The majority concluded that the practice under challenge – which cancels the registration of voters who do not go to the polls and who don’t respond to a notice – does not violate the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) and the Help America Vote Act.

This is a major victory for election integrity. As the majority (per Justice Alito) noted, it is estimated that roughly one in eight voter registrations is “either invalid or significantly inaccurate” and that 2.75 million people are registered to vote in more than one state.....

LINK


This is great news for the sake of the Republic!!!!

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Brewster
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Any proof that ANYONE has voted in more than one state?

I didn't think so...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
That was not the only reason for the purge but the answer to your question is YES.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stoned
No Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Berton
Jun 12 2018, 01:02 PM
A victory for election integrity

The Supreme Court issued a decision today in Husted v. A. Phillip Randolph Institute, a case involving Ohio’s voter list maintenance policies. By a 5-4 vote, the Court upheld Ohio’s policy of removing ineligible and outdated voters from it rolls. The majority concluded that the practice under challenge – which cancels the registration of voters who do not go to the polls and who don’t respond to a notice – does not violate the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) and the Help America Vote Act.

This is a major victory for election integrity. As the majority (per Justice Alito) noted, it is estimated that roughly one in eight voter registrations is “either invalid or significantly inaccurate” and that 2.75 million people are registered to vote in more than one state.....

LINK


This is great news for the sake of the Republic!!!!

An even greater victory for voter suppression.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
That statement is pure left-wing propaganda.

Quote:
 
The Court’s decision is clearly correct. The NVRA specifically allows states to remove, on change of residence grounds, a registered would-be voter who does not vote, who then fails to respond to a notice, and who then fails to vote in any election during the period covering the next two general federal elections. As Justice Alito explained, the Ohio practice at issue “follows the [NVRA] to the letter,” it being “undisputed that Ohio does not remove a registrant on change-of-residence grounds unless the registrant is sent, and fails to mail back a return card, and then fails to vote for an additional four years.”


Edited by Berton, Jun 13 2018, 03:33 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stoned
No Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Berton
Jun 13 2018, 03:32 AM
That statement is pure left-wing propaganda.

Quote:
 
The Court’s decision is clearly correct. The NVRA specifically allows states to remove, on change of residence grounds, a registered would-be voter who does not vote, who then fails to respond to a notice, and who then fails to vote in any election during the period covering the next two general federal elections. As Justice Alito explained, the Ohio practice at issue “follows the [NVRA] to the letter,” it being “undisputed that Ohio does not remove a registrant on change-of-residence grounds unless the registrant is sent, and fails to mail back a return card, and then fails to vote for an additional four years.”


You can tell when a political party loses its integrity. The emphasis is no longer on winning votes but on suppressing them.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
You can tell when a political party loses its morality. The emphasis is no longer on winning votes but on stealing them. That is the Dem party today.

Quote:
 
Absent evidence that Ohio’s rules are based on discriminatory intent — and none was presented — Ohio shouldn’t be estopped from attempts, in compliance with federal statutes, to maintain the integrity of its registrations rolls merely because members of certain groups may be unwilling, disproportionately, to take the simple measures needed to stay eligible.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stoned
No Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Berton
Jun 13 2018, 07:27 AM
You can tell when a political party loses its morality. The emphasis is no longer on winning votes but on stealing them. That is the Dem party today.

Quote:
 
Absent evidence that Ohio’s rules are based on discriminatory intent — and none was presented — Ohio shouldn’t be estopped from attempts, in compliance with federal statutes, to maintain the integrity of its registrations rolls merely because members of certain groups may be unwilling, disproportionately, to take the simple measures needed to stay eligible.
Nah Bert. All there is here is suppression. Had there been real voting fraud over the years there would have been charges and convictions. In order to get massive suppression you have only a few votes per election that are challenged. Most of them are simple mistakes.

You should be ashamed.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jim Miller
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Hopefully all states will do the same.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
icy-woman
Member Avatar
Silver Star Member
[ * ]
Trump won Ohio by voters who had never voted before or haven't voted in many years. If this rule was in place then I don't believe Trump would have won Ohio.

Only problem I have with this is if they discount your vote, they don't have to inform or notify you. You have all these people thinking their vote was counted when it wasn't. In many cases they flat out tell you your vote was counted when it wasn't.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Website Traffic Analysis