Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
O Canada!; It seems to work
Topic Started: Aug 15 2016, 08:24 PM (1,058 Views)
Brewster
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Why did you bump some thing that's already been answered, Berton?

Do you have a need to be repeatedly embarrassed? Is it some sort of fetish?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fulltimer
No Avatar
Member
[ * ]
He does appear rather rigid
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
Berton
Aug 16 2016, 10:17 PM
colo_crawdad
Aug 16 2016, 10:15 PM
The bottom lilne is if the US Supreme Court interprets the Constitution dufferent than the US Right’s INTER[RETATION, the US Right will claim the Court deviated from the Constitution.
I agree when the Court essentially deleted or ignored the qualifying phrase, they butchered the Second Amendment.

No, when judges deviate from the Constitution they are considered legislating from the bench. It makes no difference if they are liberal or conservative. However, most of the time it is liberal judges who think the Constitution is obsolete and therefor they must correct what they see as defects in society and deviate from the Constitution to do so.
aaasbump for Colo_crawdad.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stoned
No Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Fulltimer
Aug 16 2016, 10:19 PM
You repeat yourself a lot. Are you an Android?
No he is not. He just has trouble assembling sentences of more than three words. That is why he seldom presents anything requiring more than that content.

He doesn't have the time, or I should say there is not enough time. Just be glad that Neut presents us with an incredible example what happens where the brain runs out of computing power.

We must continue to point out his flaws and lack of reasoning. It is our charitable duty so that he may become a better person.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
Berton
Aug 16 2016, 10:44 PM
Berton
Aug 16 2016, 10:17 PM
colo_crawdad
Aug 16 2016, 10:15 PM
The bottom lilne is if the US Supreme Court interprets the Constitution dufferent than the US Right’s INTER[RETATION, the US Right will claim the Court deviated from the Constitution.
I agree when the Court essentially deleted or ignored the qualifying phrase, they butchered the Second Amendment.

No, when judges deviate from the Constitution they are considered legislating from the bench. It makes no difference if they are liberal or conservative. However, most of the time it is liberal judges who think the Constitution is obsolete and therefor they must correct what they see as defects in society and deviate from the Constitution to do so.
aaasbump for Colo_crawdad.

aaasbump For Colo_crawdad.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
colo_crawdad
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Berton,

We obviously have different definitions and understanding of the meaning of deviation. I do not wish to discuss using some esoteric right wing definiltion.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
Berton
Aug 16 2016, 10:50 PM
Berton
Aug 16 2016, 10:44 PM
Berton
Aug 16 2016, 10:17 PM
colo_crawdad
Aug 16 2016, 10:15 PM
The bottom lilne is if the US Supreme Court interprets the Constitution dufferent than the US Right’s INTER[RETATION, the US Right will claim the Court deviated from the Constitution.
I agree when the Court essentially deleted or ignored the qualifying phrase, they butchered the Second Amendment.

No, when judges deviate from the Constitution they are considered legislating from the bench. It makes no difference if they are liberal or conservative. However, most of the time it is liberal judges who think the Constitution is obsolete and therefor they must correct what they see as defects in society and deviate from the Constitution to do so.
aaasbump for Colo_crawdad.

aaasbump For Colo_crawdad.


colo_crawdad
Aug 16 2016, 11:00 PM
Berton,

We obviously have different definitions and understanding of the meaning of deviation. I do not wish to discuss using some esoteric right wing definiltion.



I have no idea what that post has to do with my answer to you.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Colo wants to copout and he did a poor job of it. lol
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
colo_crawdad
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
I guess neither Berron nor his trusty sidekick, Neutral, liked my answer.; Sorry about that.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
Berton
Aug 16 2016, 11:02 PM
Berton
Aug 16 2016, 10:50 PM
Berton
Aug 16 2016, 10:44 PM
Berton
Aug 16 2016, 10:17 PM
colo_crawdad
Aug 16 2016, 10:15 PM
The bottom lilne is if the US Supreme Court interprets the Constitution dufferent than the US Right’s INTER[RETATION, the US Right will claim the Court deviated from the Constitution.
I agree when the Court essentially deleted or ignored the qualifying phrase, they butchered the Second Amendment.

No, when judges deviate from the Constitution they are considered legislating from the bench. It makes no difference if they are liberal or conservative. However, most of the time it is liberal judges who think the Constitution is obsolete and therefor they must correct what they see as defects in society and deviate from the Constitution to do so.
aaasbump for Colo_crawdad.

aaasbump For Colo_crawdad.


colo_crawdad
Aug 16 2016, 11:00 PM
Berton,

We obviously have different definitions and understanding of the meaning of deviation. I do not wish to discuss using some esoteric right wing definiltion.



I have no idea what that post has to do with my answer to you.



colo_crawdad
Aug 16 2016, 11:12 PM
I guess neither Berron nor his trusty sidekick, Neutral, liked my answer.; Sorry about that.


I neither liked or disliked it. It made no sense to me. Please explain.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Website Traffic Analysis