Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
The Clintons Donated Lots of Money to… Themselves
Topic Started: Aug 14 2016, 08:17 PM (644 Views)
Banandangees
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Stoned
Aug 15 2016, 08:25 PM
Banandangees
Aug 15 2016, 07:23 PM
It's hard to believe that some people are so gullible, so tilted, that they actually think the Clintons are people of high moral character.
Keep throwing Schit. Some may stick. More likely you will be buried in that which doesn't.

:teeth: I wasn't "throwing Schit" at Hillary. As you can see from my post, I was referring to the "gullibles" and the "so tilted" who actually think the Clintons are people of moral character. Get any on ya?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pat
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Stoned
Aug 15 2016, 12:06 AM
Pat
Aug 14 2016, 11:31 PM
It's their money so they can give it to themselves.

If the IRS under another president finds the foundation to not be charitable, then they can pay back taxes and interest.

I'm sure their supporters are happy to see that they gave $42,000 to charity. You know, they care so much about those in need. :hystery:
Perhaps you ought to educate yourselof so you do not sound so foolish. It might go over big with y9our right wing friends but ou9t in the real world you just sound silly.

Another philanthropy watchdog, CharityWatch, a project of the American Institute of Philanthropy, gave the Clinton Foundation an “A” rating.
Daniel Borochoff, president and founder of CharityWatch, told us by phone that its analysis of the finances of the Clinton Foundation and its affiliates found that about 89 percent of the foundation budget is spent on programming (or “charity”), higher than the 75 percent considered the industry standard.
By only looking at the amount the Clinton Foundation doled out in grants, Fiorina “is showing her lack of understanding of charitable organizations,” Borochoff said. “She’s thinking of the Clinton Foundation as a private foundation.” Those kinds of foundations are typically supported by money from a few people, and the money is then distributed to various charities. The Clinton Foundation, however, is a public charity, he said. It mostly does its own charitable work. It has over 2,000 employees worldwide.



http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/
You believe that organization rather than the facts.

I suggest you deepen your research.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stoned
No Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Pat
Aug 16 2016, 04:10 AM
Stoned
Aug 15 2016, 12:06 AM
Pat
Aug 14 2016, 11:31 PM
It's their money so they can give it to themselves.

If the IRS under another president finds the foundation to not be charitable, then they can pay back taxes and interest.

I'm sure their supporters are happy to see that they gave $42,000 to charity. You know, they care so much about those in need. :hystery:
Perhaps you ought to educate yourselof so you do not sound so foolish. It might go over big with y9our right wing friends but ou9t in the real world you just sound silly.

Another philanthropy watchdog, CharityWatch, a project of the American Institute of Philanthropy, gave the Clinton Foundation an “A” rating.
Daniel Borochoff, president and founder of CharityWatch, told us by phone that its analysis of the finances of the Clinton Foundation and its affiliates found that about 89 percent of the foundation budget is spent on programming (or “charity”), higher than the 75 percent considered the industry standard.
By only looking at the amount the Clinton Foundation doled out in grants, Fiorina “is showing her lack of understanding of charitable organizations,” Borochoff said. “She’s thinking of the Clinton Foundation as a private foundation.” Those kinds of foundations are typically supported by money from a few people, and the money is then distributed to various charities. The Clinton Foundation, however, is a public charity, he said. It mostly does its own charitable work. It has over 2,000 employees worldwide.



http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/
You believe that organization rather than the facts.

I suggest you deepen your research.
I thought the article discussed "the facts" pretty well.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Brewster
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Republican Dictionary:

Facts = Bits of information which support Right Wing Ideology. Everything that does not suit their Ideology is automatically "False". If a "False" piece of information is proven to be accurate, it can be safely ignored, and the "Facts" proclaimed again.

This is a very valuable system of Categorization:

For instance, Although Hillary has never found guilty of any wrongdoing in any the MANY investigations, that bit of information does not support their Ideology, so is therefore "False".

Since Hillary continues to point at all those investigative failures, all of which are known to be "False", it is obvious that she's a liar, and undoubtedly a corrupt person. No other evidence is necessary.

On the other hand, even though Trump has been shown by actual count to make blatant, easily checkable lies and/or contradict himself at rates occasionally as high as a new one every Minute, those bits are precisely what Right Wingers want to hear, so by definition, must be "Facts".

All that proves he's a good, solid leader, and should be made President, regardless of how the vote goes in November, as we already know that if Hillary wins the count, that information must be "False".
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Noclue wants to divert from the Clinton's corruption of course.
I have a lot of hope this Foundation scandal will get them.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Brewster
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Upset that so many people believe all that "False" information about the Clintons?

You should be more upset with all the mouse poop scattered around this place.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Quit spreading that mouse poop Brew.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]

The facts are the Foundation pays for their travel, hotel and meals.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stoned
No Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Berton
Aug 17 2016, 09:11 AM
The facts are the Foundation pays for their travel, hotel and meals.

If you did not revel in being ignorant you would know why. Too much to expect I guess. Go back to whining.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
You insult and say you have knowledge but you never give it. LOL We have so many liberal phonies on this board.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create your own social network with a free forum.
Learn More · Sign-up Now
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Website Traffic Analysis