Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Non political
Topic Started: Aug 13 2016, 10:03 PM (1,316 Views)
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Canook trying to protect another canook. Both anti American snotters.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fulltimer
No Avatar
Member
[ * ]
Not a nice way to describe our northern neighbors who have time and time again proven themselves as our best friends.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
You canooks have proven you anti Americanism many times Beddows.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
BTW, there is no "OUR". You are NOT part of my country and thank God for that. Just a snot nosed canook.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fulltimer
No Avatar
Member
[ * ]
Ignoring the child above and back to the subject, it's interesting the difference between US and Russian fighter jets. I've seen both the F35 and SU 35 up close in static displays. The F35 like most US fighters is smooth and sleek in appearance. The SU 35 on the other hand appears a bit crude on the outside. The big difference is that Russian fighters can operate on runways littered with junk. They have to sweep US based to remove any trace of debris. This could give the Russians a big advantage in war situations. It takes a team to get a US pilot into an aircraft, a Russian just climbs in and takes off. Sometimes I think we gone too far with relying on technology and forgotten the basics. Probably only the F 22 could stand up to the SU 35s in a combat situation and the new SU T50 going in to service in 2017 which is actually quite similar to an F22, it could be more than a match for that aircraft. It would be a big mistake to underestimate Russian air power
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Maybe you canooks could take care of the Russians air power for us? LOL
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Thumper
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Fulltimer
Aug 15 2016, 04:21 AM
Ignoring the child above and back to the subject, it's interesting the difference between US and Russian fighter jets. I've seen both the F35 and SU 35 up close in static displays. The F35 like most US fighters is smooth and sleek in appearance. The SU 35 on the other hand appears a bit crude on the outside. The big difference is that Russian fighters can operate on runways littered with junk. They have to sweep US based to remove any trace of debris. This could give the Russians a big advantage in war situations. It takes a team to get a US pilot into an aircraft, a Russian just climbs in and takes off. Sometimes I think we gone too far with relying on technology and forgotten the basics. Probably only the F 22 could stand up to the SU 35s in a combat situation and the new SU T50 going in to service in 2017 which is actually quite similar to an F22, it could be more than a match for that aircraft. It would be a big mistake to underestimate Russian air power
What a bunch of bull crap. I don't know what your expertise is but it sure isn't tactical aircraft.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
It is just his way of another America bashing. He pretends to have knowledge and he has zero.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Telco is full of BS again. Here are the performers. He also said the Thunderbirds has a 45 minute introduction before flying. A total lie.
http://www.abbotsfordairshow.com/events/2016-performers/
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Here is a list of the static aircraft at Abbotsford. Wrong again Beddows.
http://www.abbotsfordairshow.com/events/static-display/
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Website Traffic Analysis