Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Donald Trump Highlights New Hampshire Factories Closed Thanks to Hillary Clinton’s Trade Agenda
Topic Started: Jul 1 2016, 09:22 PM (64 Views)
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]

Donald Trump Highlights New Hampshire Factories Closed Thanks to Hillary Clinton’s Trade Agenda


Ahead of his campaign rally in Manchester, New Hampshire, Donald Trump is highlighting the devastation that Hillary Clinton’s trade agenda has had on New Hampshire workers.

On Thursday, his campaign sent out multiple press statements to reporters—replete with citations and studies— documenting the devastating impact Hillary Clinton’s trade policies have had on some of the key battle ground states this election.

The data-rich press releases seem to underscore an observation CNN’s Dana Bash made earlier this week following Trump’s speech outlining his trade agenda. On Tuesday, Bash told CNN viewers that the media is now witnessing “a new Trump campaign”—one that appears better organized and more efficient. Bash noted that during his speech, his campaign was sending out detailed citations of facts and figures that bolster and confirm Trump’s arguments.

In one of Thursday’s press releases, the Trump campaign noted that “New Hampshire has suffered multiple factory closures due to offshoring.”..........


LINK



So do you progressives want to support someone who supports offshoring?


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pat
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
This is the stuff that turns elections around. And Clinton has no answer. We already witnessed her lose the coal region, West Virginians don't want her or her husband to visit their state. Trump is going to carry some areas that the left will be surprised about.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stoned
No Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Pat
Jul 2 2016, 12:46 AM
This is the stuff that turns elections around. And Clinton has no answer. We already witnessed her lose the coal region, West Virginians don't want her or her husband to visit their state. Trump is going to carry some areas that the left will be surprised about.
I can show you three factories that Mitt, personally, had shipped to China. All profitable, just not profitable enough for Mitt. Some how I never heard you complain about that.

Do your really thinkTrump has the will, let alone the means to change this? I have not heard a word about method. I would feel better about it had he not shipped his own production overseas.

To do wha the says he wants to do would require a dictator. Or is that the plan.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pat
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Stoned
Jul 2 2016, 01:05 AM
Pat
Jul 2 2016, 12:46 AM
This is the stuff that turns elections around. And Clinton has no answer. We already witnessed her lose the coal region, West Virginians don't want her or her husband to visit their state. Trump is going to carry some areas that the left will be surprised about.
I can show you three factories that Mitt, personally, had shipped to China. All profitable, just not profitable enough for Mitt. Some how I never heard you complain about that.

Do your really thinkTrump has the will, let alone the means to change this? I have not heard a word about method. I would feel better about it had he not shipped his own production overseas.

To do wha the says he wants to do would require a dictator. Or is that the plan.
Since you ignored the OP, I'll leave your questions for you to figure out.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stoned
No Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Pat
Jul 2 2016, 01:23 AM
Stoned
Jul 2 2016, 01:05 AM
Pat
Jul 2 2016, 12:46 AM
This is the stuff that turns elections around. And Clinton has no answer. We already witnessed her lose the coal region, West Virginians don't want her or her husband to visit their state. Trump is going to carry some areas that the left will be surprised about.
I can show you three factories that Mitt, personally, had shipped to China. All profitable, just not profitable enough for Mitt. Some how I never heard you complain about that.

Do your really thinkTrump has the will, let alone the means to change this? I have not heard a word about method. I would feel better about it had he not shipped his own production overseas.

To do wha the says he wants to do would require a dictator. Or is that the plan.
Since you ignored the OP, I'll leave your questions for you to figure out.
Ok but Ihave just one more question. What trade deals have come under the Obama administration? Don't count TPP. That is not in force.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pat
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Here is one example---http://www.ibtimes.com/panama-papers-obama-clinton-pushed-trade-deal-amid-warnings-it-would-make-money-2348076

You have the Trans Pacific Asia one and the pact with Europe. He also pushed for the fast track legislation that Paul Ryan agreed to. Obama and Clinton are globalists, the same ones that Trump has in his sights.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stoned
No Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Pat
Jul 2 2016, 03:18 AM
Here is one example---http://www.ibtimes.com/panama-papers-obama-clinton-pushed-trade-deal-amid-warnings-it-would-make-money-2348076

You have the Trans Pacific Asia one and the pact with Europe. He also pushed for the fast track legislation that Paul Ryan agreed to. Obama and Clinton are globalists, the same ones that Trump has in his sights.
I am confused. TPP although signed is not in effect and as far as I can see will not be until ratified by congress. The link below is the only thing I can find on Obama and trade deals.

At the time it seems to have been considered beneficial, at Least by Republicans. You have more information?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10/21/obama-signs-3-trade-deals-biggest-since-nafta.html
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pat
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Why are you confused? I thought you were looking for examples of the two and trade deals they support.

I agree, thank goodness congress saved us from the disaster, now let's hope the voters due in November. Vote Trump.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stoned
No Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Pat
Jul 2 2016, 03:48 AM
Why are you confused? I thought you were looking for examples of the two and trade deals they support.

I agree, thank goodness congress saved us from the disaster, now let's hope the voters due in November. Vote Trump.
I don't know, You seem to be blaming Obama for things that happened beause of trade deals that don't exist. What has happened beause of trade deals he actually approved and are in effect?
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Website Traffic Analysis