| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Hillary is the "Establishment" | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 31 2016, 07:50 PM (122 Views) | |
| Banandangees | May 31 2016, 07:50 PM Post #1 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
On MSNBC this morning it was being reported that Bernie Sanders, campaigning for the California vote, says that Hillary is the establishment. Apparently, "The Atlantic" agrees with him, Of Course Hillary Clinton Exemplifies the Establishment. And, Bernie Sanders and/or his supporters are claiming that "the establishment screwed him," I suppose in part over that "super delegate" thingy. Now, "Rawstory," (and who is to doubt the non-biased, fairness of RawStory), is reporting: Not so Bernie! Hold on!, "RawStory" is reporting, Here’s the fatal flaw in Bernie Sanders supporters’ claim that the establishment screwed him. Can you believe it? Some folks don't actually feel that "RawStory" is a credible, non biased media, that it is a very biased, far LWEC media that represents the far left "establishment" and NOT the far left soon-to-happen far left "social revolution." So, Bernie is going to continue the fight down to the wire. Of course, he will be hated by the "Democrat establishment", but loved by the anti-establishment folks, the "Democrat Social Revolutionaries", who are looking for and really want free stuff to the point of equalization.... one "Democrat social revolution" goal. The "Democrat establishment" just says all that stuff but don't really mean it. The "Revolutionaries" really mean it. I mean, how can you believe them (the Democrat Establishment, led by their new leader, Hillary) when their soon to be leader (baring internment into some Fed prison), keeps changing her mind on what she is for or will do: ...according to an article in yesterday's "Boston Globe:" Hillary Clinton's Campaign Message Keeps Evolving So, some say, to be sure to beat Trump, Hillary should select Bernie as her VP, but wouldn't that be like mixing oil and water...... "establishment" and "social revolutionaries"??? How does that mix end up? I mean, folks voting for Bernie and folks voting for Donald have one major thing in common..... they both are super sick of the "establishments." I mean, they hate it. So imagine, "The Young Turks" want a pre-election debate between Sanders and Trump. I mean, are they rooting for Hillary and trying to use a debate to start a "political revolution" among the "anti-establishment" voters?.... with Hillary coming out on top? What a country! All that folks is a good example of a multifaceted conundrum. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic » |





![]](http://z3.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)



10:45 PM Jul 11
