Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Let's try this again -- Hillary e-mail excuses blow up; Today the left media turned on her
Topic Started: May 27 2016, 11:48 AM (464 Views)
Pat
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Two campaigns crossing in the night. When today began we still had the left making excuses and defending Hillary. Still clinging to the investigation as being a massive right wing conspiracy.

Gravity has finally taken hold of Hillary, she has been defying it for months. Tonight I see where the big name liberal media is in a unified chorus, this is an astounding turn of events. The Teflon is gone. Does the media know something we don't? Is the much speculated indictment about to become reality? Has the liberal media changed it's tune because to deny reality would be a big hit for their networks, newspapers, magazines, etc?

Hillary's lies finally are accepted by the left media in the open as bogus, she's. guilty. Chuck Todd went so far as to say she could not be confirmed for the state department now with these revelations. Andrea Mitchel has turned. Don't believe me? Do a little searching. Today was the day.

In the meantime the other ship passing in the night woke up today surpassing the delegate count needed for confirmation.

Bill and Hillary both carried California by large margins in the past, Bernie is statistically even now, poised to pass her. Losing California is big given how far she as slipped. How can she be electable in even the most extreme cases of a "Hillary supporter". Bernie is going to fly past Hillary to the convention, the question now is what do the pledged super delegates do?

Warning--any BS posts like those that happened in the thread i had to close, need to be contained bwefore they reach your keyboard and are posted.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
I was listening to Rudy Guiliani last night and I agree with him, with that report if they don't indict her it is going to be hard to explain why.
She broke the law.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
colo_crawdad
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
That report said at
least three additional things. One, Hillary committed no crime or crimes. Two, Hillary did nothing that placed our country at risk. Three, Hillary did nothing that former Secretaries of State haven't done.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
That's not true Colo but here are three that she should be indicted on.
1. Mishandling Classified Information
Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code make it unlawful to send of store classified information on personal email. Casey Harper at The Daily Caller delved into this angle:

“‘By using a private email system, Secretary Clinton violated the Federal Records Act and the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual regarding records management, and worse, could have left classified and top secret documents vulnerable to cyber attack,’ Cause of Action Executive Director Dan Epstein said in an email to reporters.

‘This is an egregious violation of the law, and if it were anyone else, they could be facing fines and criminal prosecution.’”
Harper goes on to point out that multiple violations of this law have been enforced recently, including in 1999, when former CIA Director John M. Deutch’s security clearance was suspended for using his personal email to send classified information.

Additionally, this past week, Gen. David Patraeus pleaded guilty for mishandling classified information by using a Gmail account instead of his official government email.

2. Violation of The 2009 Federal Records Act
Section 1236.22 of the 2009 National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) requirements states that:

“Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency record keeping system.”
According to the original story on Clinton’s emails published in The New York Times:

“Federal regulations, since 2009, have required that all emails be preserved as part of an agency’s record-keeping system. In Mrs. Clinton’s case, her emails were kept on her personal account and her staff took no steps to have them preserved as part of State Department record.

In response to a State Department request, Mrs. Clinton’s advisers, late last year, reviewed her account and decided which emails to turn over to the State Department.”
The fact that the State Department combs through the 55,000 pages of emails sent on Clinton’s private email account seems to verify that at least some of the emails Clinton sent contained classified information.

3. Violation of the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA)
Veterans for a Strong America has filed a lawsuit against the State Department over potential violations of FOIA. Joel Arends, chairman of the non-profit group, explained to the Washington Examiner that their FOIA request over the Benghazi affair specifically asked for any personal email accounts Secretary Clinton may have used:

“‘At this point in time, I think we’re the only ones that specifically asked for both her personal and government email and phone logs,’ Arends said of his group’s Benghazi-related request.”
MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell believes that the use of a personal emails server appears to be a preemptive move, specifically designed to circumvent FOIA:


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
http://www.ijreview.com/2015/03/264655-3-federal-laws-hillary-may-violated-secret-email-accounts/
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
colo_crawdad
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Who or what is irevilew.com? I based b my comments on reading the report rather than read about the report.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Okay attack the source again. I gave you the laws she may very well be indicted on, if you are afraid of the facts stay stupid. Better read the NYTimes and attack them too though.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
colo_crawdad
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Who "attacked the source, Newt? I just asked who or what it is. You don't have any answer? Okay, I accept that you used a source without any thought as to its reliability or reliability as a news source.

Mist be a right wing thing.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Colo's diversions will not change the fact Hillary is in deep trouble. I never thought it would happen but now I am saying she is possible done as a candidate and may very well be under indictment soon. Stonewalling the Inspector General was not very smart.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]

"Tonight I see where the big name liberal media is in a unified chorus"

It looks like the LWEC has turned on her after covering for her for many years. Now it is the Dems who are in total disarray. Can the party come together to support a candidate?

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Website Traffic Analysis