Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
NASA Has Known Since 1971 That CO2 Is Not Dangerous, Yet Lied To The Public Continuously
Topic Started: Nov 13 2015, 01:59 PM (661 Views)
Brewster
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
More nonsense from Neut.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Nonsense is what you spew daily Brew.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stoned
No Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
I thought Exxon was being sued because they lied. Looks like that is going to be a real hard case to prove. (chuckle)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
Quote:
 
The evidence of fraud is overwhelming. An essential component of greenhouse gas theory is that a hotspot will appear in the upper troposphere. It hasn’t happened.

Posted Image

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stoned
No Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Roy (Spencer) was a good ol boy until the truth caught up

https://www.skepticalscience.com/skeptic_Roy_Spencer.htm
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stoned
No Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Stoned
Nov 14 2015, 04:35 AM
Roy (Spencer) was a good ol boy until the truth caught up

https://www.skepticalscience.com/skeptic_Roy_Spencer.htm
The good opl boy gets caught, again and again

https://bbickmore.wordpress.com/roy-spencer/

One might say that Roy could be known as the home of the climate whopper

http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2014/02/roy-spencers-latest-deceit-and-deception.html

Climate is not the only thing he denies

From Wikipedia

Intelligent design[edit]
In TCS Daily, Spencer wrote, "Twenty years ago, as a PhD scientist, I intensely studied the evolution versus intelligent design controversy for about two years. And finally, despite my previous acceptance of evolutionary theory as 'fact,' I came to the realization that intelligent design, as a theory of origins, is no more religious, and no less scientific, than evolutionism. In the scientific community, I am not alone. There are many fine books out there on the subject. Curiously, most of the books are written by scientists who lost faith in evolution as adults, after they learned how to apply the analytical tools they were taught in college."[41] In the book The Evolution Crisis, Spencer wrote, "I finally became convinced that the theory of creation actually had a much better scientific basis than the theory of evolution, for the creation model was actually better able to explain the physical and biological complexity in the world. [...] Science has startled us with its many discoveries and advances, but it has hit a brick wall in its attempt to rid itself of the need for a creator and designer."[42]

Climatologist Patrick Michaels has defended Spencer, arguing that his religious beliefs have nothing to do with his climate change researc
h
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
Satellites show that there has been about 0.1C warming over the past 25 years. Even less than the sensitivity calculated by Rasool and Schneider in 1971


Posted Image

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stoned
No Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Berton
Nov 14 2015, 06:05 AM
Satellites show that there has been about 0.1C warming over the past 25 years. Even less than the sensitivity calculated by Rasool and Schneider in 1971


Posted Image

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs
Wow! If that is not convincing I don't know what is. Masterful research!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Brewster
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Berton
Nov 14 2015, 04:12 AM
Quote:
 
The evidence of fraud is overwhelming. An essential component of greenhouse gas theory is that a hotspot will appear in the upper troposphere. It hasn’t happened.

Posted Image
Congratulations, Berton! You're really getting in the swing of things!

You've just produced a double lie in one paragraph!

Lie #1: The tropical Hotspot hasn't happened.

Totally wrong. The Hot Spot has not only happened, it's been happening on & off since Man has been able to measure at that altitude, and probably for millennia before that.

Lie #2: An essential component of greenhouse gas theory is that a hotspot will appear.

Hilariously wrong. The Hot Spot has almost NOTHING to do with Greenhouse Gas Theory, or any other function tied directly to Climate Change. A Hot Spot is generated any time tropical temperatures are abnormally high, no matter what drove the temps up in that area. If the tropics were cooled, by say, a volcano, there would be no Hot Spot, even if the rest of the Globe was frying, and vice versa.

Link
Edited by Brewster, Nov 14 2015, 07:18 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
All of the climate models have overestimated warming, many by a large amount.


http://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/CMIP5-73-models-vs-obs-20N-20S-MT-5-yr-means1-1.png

It doesn’t matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are. If it doesn’t agree with experiment, it’s wrong.

Richard P. Feynman
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Website Traffic Analysis