| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| NASA Has Known Since 1971 That CO2 Is Not Dangerous, Yet Lied To The Public Continuously | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 13 2015, 01:59 PM (659 Views) | |
| Berton | Nov 13 2015, 01:59 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Thunder Fan
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
NASA Has Known Since 1971 That CO2 Is Not Dangerous, Yet Lied To The Public Continuously Posted on November 8, 2015 by tonyheller New York State is investigating Exxon for telling the truth about CO2 in 1976, but the big story is that NASA and NCAR have known since 1971 that CO2 is not dangerous – yet have lied to the public about this for over 30 years. In 1971, the top climatologists at NCAR and NASA reported that a runaway greenhouse effect is not possible, because the CO2 absorption spectra is nearly saturated already. ![]() vademecum.brandenberger.eu/pdf/klima/rasool_schneider_1971.pdf This is exactly what NCAR’s current radiative transfer models show. Adding more CO2 has very little effect on downwelling longwave radiation........ LINK There is a lot more information and charts at the link. The scam is coming apart at the seams. |
![]() |
|
| Brewster | Nov 13 2015, 03:07 PM Post #2 |
![]()
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wow! Imagine that! We've learned nothing sine 1971! That is the dumbest article I have ever read - I don't know where they got that crap, but Scientists knew far better than that even then. One of the stupidest lines: Temperatures can only go up so far because CO2 "saturates". Considering the gas is simply absorbing then immediately reradiating the heat, that would be like saying a mirror can only get a little bit bright because the glass can only soak up some of the light. But here's MY FAVOURITE LINE: That is 100% correct. You could pour in almost infinite amounts of CO2, and it would have essentially zero effect on the downwelling longwave radiation, because there's almost none anyway. The Sun is primarily putting out shortwave radiation, which sails right on through the CO2, because CO2 is essentially invisible to shortwave. Have you noted the Sun feels warm on your skin? Once that radiation is converted to heat by the Earth, then it is radiated back out as longwave, and THAT is trapped, bouncing back and forth.
Edited by Brewster, Nov 13 2015, 03:10 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Berton | Nov 13 2015, 03:23 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Thunder Fan
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That is a nice theory you have there. Too bad it is not working out for you.
Edited by Berton, Nov 13 2015, 03:25 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Neutral | Nov 13 2015, 09:15 PM Post #4 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The scam is being exposed to all now. |
![]() |
|
| Brewster | Nov 14 2015, 01:58 AM Post #5 |
![]()
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Berton, you have already exposed yourself several times as a Gullible fool. Don't you think it's time to ease off? So now you want to use an experiment that is over 100 years old, at the very beginning of the science, with no actual data recorded, as proof that modern scientists are fooling themselves, and us? How much gas? Define "Scarcely changed"? How about "Blocked radiation" "Thoroughly"? Talk about a bogus, useless article...
|
![]() |
|
| Jim Miller | Nov 14 2015, 02:02 AM Post #6 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I guess the left-wing blogs must not have liked it, eh? |
![]() |
|
| Neutral | Nov 14 2015, 02:21 AM Post #7 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Brew pretends to be astonished again with facts. |
![]() |
|
| Brewster | Nov 14 2015, 02:36 AM Post #8 |
![]()
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I would be astonished if you used facts. At least most of the Righties go looking for articles, although they need a lesson or two in critical thinking. You on the other hand contribute absolutely nothing except the odd moment of unintended humour. |
![]() |
|
| Sea Dog | Nov 14 2015, 02:41 AM Post #9 |
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
And these are the people who want to form a government to run the country. Thinking people should be very afraid! |
![]() |
|
| Neutral | Nov 14 2015, 02:41 AM Post #10 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
More pretending by Brew. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic » |






![]](http://z3.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)





9:00 AM Jul 11
