Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Federal Court: Obama’s Partnership With Mexican Drug Cartels Goes Far Beyond Guns
Topic Started: Dec 21 2013, 02:45 AM (825 Views)
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
I heard Telcoturd's blog was a great source.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Sea Dog
No Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Neutral
Dec 21 2013, 10:55 AM
I heard Telcoturd's blog was a great source.
Witty post!
How are you enjoying the fourth grade?
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
colo_crawdad
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Sea Dog
Dec 21 2013, 09:39 PM
Neutral
Dec 21 2013, 10:55 AM
I heard Telcoturd's blog was a great source.
Witty post!
How are you enjoying the fourth grade?
Didn't Pat tell Neut, the wannabe adminisrator, specifically to quit using that kind of language just a day or two ago? Does Neut care anything about the rules of this forum or the specific directions of the true administrator?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Banandangees
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
colo_crawdad
Dec 21 2013, 09:54 AM
Good for you Pat! You saw right through the right wing misleading propaganda. It was made especially easy coming from "Powerline."

Are you saying that because this article was printed in publication that is not a liberal publication that the case, "United States of America v. Mirtha Veronica Nava-Martinez" never existed and the opinion/ruling by Texas federal judge Andrew Hanen never happened; and, that the facts presented in the case concerning this mother, child and child trafficker are false/right-wing fabricated?

And Telco, what difference does it make in this case if someone other that the Obama administration formed HLS? Who (what administration) formed the IRS and are they responsible for the recent IRS profiling activities?

The issue as I see it (and I sure don't know all the facts) is, a legal precedent has been set for illegal child trafficking that compromise existing child trafficking laws.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
colo_crawdad
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Banandangees
Dec 21 2013, 10:26 PM
colo_crawdad
Dec 21 2013, 09:54 AM
Good for you Pat! You saw right through the right wing misleading propaganda. It was made especially easy coming from "Powerline."

Are you saying that because this article was printed in publication that is not a liberal publication that the case, "United States of America v. Mirtha Veronica Nava-Martinez" never existed and the opinion/ruling by Texas federal judge Andrew Hanen never happened; and, that the facts presented in the case concerning this mother, child and child trafficker are false/right-wing fabricated?
1. No.

2. Given the lack of credibility of "Powerline" as a news source, one has no idea whether the questions you ask are true or false.

(I left the comment to Telco for Telco to answer.)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
Banandangees
Dec 21 2013, 10:26 PM
colo_crawdad
Dec 21 2013, 09:54 AM
Good for you Pat! You saw right through the right wing misleading propaganda. It was made especially easy coming from "Powerline."

Are you saying that because this article was printed in publication that is not a liberal publication that the case, "United States of America v. Mirtha Veronica Nava-Martinez" never existed and the opinion/ruling by Texas federal judge Andrew Hanen never happened; and, that the facts presented in the case concerning this mother, child and child trafficker are false/right-wing fabricated?

And Telco, what difference does it make in this case if someone other that the Obama administration formed HLS? Who (what administration) formed the IRS and are they responsible for the recent IRS profiling activities?

The issue as I see it (and I sure don't know all the facts) is, a legal precedent has been set for illegal child trafficking that compromise existing child trafficking laws.
Great post!!! bestpost
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
colo_crawdad
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
See the post just prior to Berton's claim of a "great post." He left out the answers to Ban's questions. That is called "cherry picking." is it not?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
Your answers are non answers and you are committing the "genetic" logical fallacy.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
colo_crawdad
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Berton
Dec 22 2013, 08:53 AM
Your answers are non answers and you are committing the "genetic" logical fallacy.
I don't think so. As far as I know, I am not related to you in any way
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
"genetic" logical fallacy: Judging something good or bad on the basis of where it comes from, or from whom it comes from.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Website Traffic Analysis